Will Judge Susan Weaver Overlook Her Pet’s Complete Lack of Argument in His Reply to Motion for Default Judgment?

Arkansas Attorney William “Zac” White filed a motion for default judgment that would transfer title of 40 acres and a house from a trust to his client. For some reason, which I can only speculate about, Zac refused to issue a summons to the “trustee” of the trust.

Judge Susan Kaye Weaver has favored Willy White throughout the proceedings. Attorneys who will remain nameless, as they need to work in courts presided over by the very blond judge, complain that Judge Weaver chooses “favorites”. But it appears to this writer that she does not just favor one party over another. She makes an affirmative effort to throw “the game”.

For example, in the case of Pietrczak v. Rural Revival Living Trust, et al, Judge Weaver dismissed the pro se plaintiff’s counterclaim sua sponte, with no notice, without specifying the inadequacies in the pleading.

A response was filed to the motion for default judgment.

Mr. White had 5 days plus weekends to reply. He waited an extra week, then filed the “response” below.

Besides calling his reply a “response”, he said the Defendant filed the motion for default judgment. Read the title.

If you are not familiar with motion practice, read my objection to the insufficient “response” posted below. I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice. It is an actual court document intended to explain to Judge Weaver why, as much as she hates me, she is not allowed by law to transfer title to the property based on the motion for default judgment.