Why Did Judge Billy Roy Wilson Dismiss a case Concerning the Alleged Fictionalization of a Transcript Based on Rooker-Feldman?

The short answer: Judge Billy Roy Wilson is corrupt.

The more perplexing question is “Why did the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirm the dismissal?”

I filed a civil rights action against Judge Susan Kaye Weaver, Court Reporter Jana Perry and Attorney William Zac White. I alleged that the three conspired to make an inaccurate transcript of a hearing in case number 65CV-21-20 in Searcy County Arkansas.

Judge Wilson granted a motion to dismiss filed by Attorney General Leslie Rutledge’s Office on behalf of Judge Weaver and the court reporter before Mr. White even filed a joinder or his own motion. Judge Billy Bob threw in a dismissal for Zac White with no prompting…that the public was made aware of.

One basis Judge Wilson cited for the dismissal was the “Rooker-Feldman” doctrine.

But,

“If a federal plaintiff asserts as a legal wrong an allegedly erroneous decision by a state court, and seeks relief from a state court judgment based on that decision, Rooker–Feldman bars … jurisdiction…. If, on the other hand, a … plaintiff asserts … an allegedly illegal act or omission by an adverse party, Rooker–Feldman does not bar jurisdiction.”

Hageman v. Barton, 817 F.3d 611, 614–15 (8th Cir. 2016)

My complaint specified that I was not asking for review of a state court decision. Though, the bizarre decisions made by Judge S.K. Weaver should certainly be overturned.

It seems to me that collusion between an attorney, a judge and a court reporter to fictionalize the record should be considered an illegal act.

Welcome to Grisham Land.

My suggestion is that if you have any assets, you don’t bring them to Arkansas. A redneck judge at the Federal or State level might decide one of his buddies should be granted your assets and it sucks to be you.