The King’s New Clothes: Judge Weaver Tries to Silence Me from Pointing Out Her Deceptions

It is illegal to practice law without a license. Does that make writing that statement an illegal act?

I think not. Otherwise, we would need to round-up and incarcerate every parent who tells their child, “it is illegal to use marijuana without obtaining a medical marijuana card in Arkansas.” It would be illegal for that back seat driver to say “the speed limit here is only 35 miles per hour. Slow down.”

If laypeople are not allowed to discuss law, a non-attorney might be able to opine that Kyle Rittenhouse shot and killed two men, but the non-attorney would not be allowed to talk about whether it was legal for the young man to possess a gun in the first place or if the shooting was murder.

What if there are two co-defendants in a case, and one of the defendants claims innocence and mentions that the other defendant is equally innocent?

This is what is happening in a civil case that was filed against me.

I successfully proved my innocence. The case against me was dismissed with prejudice, which means on the merits.

The other defendant was a trust of which I am trustee and the beneficiary. Non-attorneys cannot represent trusts, even if they are trustee and beneficiary, or so say most attorneys.

After I was dismissed, Judge Weaver wrote an order in which she “found” that I did all the things the plaintiff claimed, including practicing law without a license when I supposedly prepared legal documents for the trust and the plaintiff. She ignored that just days before she wrote that I was dismissed with prejudice.

Based on my newly “found” trespasses, the trust was held liable for all the damages, because, according to Judge Susan Weaver the trust knew or should have known I was not a licensed attorney, and therefore the trust filed “unauthentic and fraudulent” documents.

Judge Weaver does not want me to say the plaintiff directed the preparation of the documents. She does not want me to say the plaintiff committed fraud against me to the tune of $260,000. The judge does not want me to say that the plaintiff wrote a letter in his own hand, signed, that describes his intent to trick me into giving him over $80,000 more to settle any debt the trust agreed to pay to him, knowing he would use the money to sue me and the trust for 6 or 7 times that amount.

Judge Weaver said making those statements in court would be the unauthorized practice of law.

I think Judge Weaver is pretending she is an imbecile, writing orders that rip off the trust (which is money that should go to me), knowing that no attorney will dare to defend the trust against Judge Weaver’s evil.

Judge Weaver was eager to make arguments for the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff was represented by an attorney. Then, she ignored the truth that supported dismissal of the unrepresented trust. She gave the represented plaintiff everything he asked for…literally.

Property in Arkansas is cheap compared to most states. But be warned, if you bring your money into Arkansas, Judge Weaver and her ilk will probably find a way to take all your assets with bullshit lawsuits filed by her pet attorneys.