Welcome to Weavergate.

I am not an attorney. Nothing here should be taken as legal advice.

Because I am not allowed to practice law and there are a few judges and lawyers who would like any excuse to incarcerate me, I usually write about my own cases. I am free to discuss my experiences and how I responded in certain situations but must tip toe lightly around other people’s cases.

If you have followed my blog, you have read about two of my cases, Pietrczak and PRA.

The two cases collided, like particles in the Big Bang.

Pietrczak is about a man who conned me into believing he was in love with me in order to defraud me of hundreds of thousands of dollars. After making off like a bandit, he filed a lawsuit against me in an attempt to take many times the initial fraud. A lawyer named William White helped him to win the lawsuit by default against a trust that I am a trustee of, even though the joint claims against me were dismissed on the merits. It appeared to me and many attorneys I asked to represent the trust that the judge on the case is colluding with Pietrczak and White. No lawyer would represent the trust out of self-preservation.

One appearance of bias is that the judge, Susan Weaver, insists that she made an erroneous ruling orally, and that I took more than the allotted 10 days plus weekends to object, so the order became a written order with no opportunity to respond in writing.

I was representing myself in the hearing and know what was said. Judge Weaver said that she spoke to the “AOC” during a short break and they told her Pietrczak’s oral motion for an extension of time to serve summons on the trust had to be in writing and I had to be given an opportunity to respond in writing.

The official court reporter’s transcript followed the fiction created by Judge Weaver and Attorney White.

I guess the conspirators thought that I would be scared of disputing Judge Weaver’s lies, like so many of the lawyers in this neck of the woods and let her transfer property that should belong to me to her friends and family.

Judge Weaver does scare me. But I am a champion poker player. There is a fun saying in poker. “A big pair beats everything.” Regardless of the spoken threat that Judge Weaver will incarcerate me and give all the money I ever earn or inherit to Pietrczak and White, I called her “bluff”. She gets away with a lot of stuff, but I don’t think she will get away this time.

So far, I have limited the amount of impermissible transfer to the value of a 40-acre parcel with a cabin, because that is the only assets that ever got put into the trust.

The PRA case is about a debt buyer that made incessant phone calls to me in an attempt to collect an alleged debt. At first, I thought I had no debt. Not to Portfolio Recovery Associates and not to anyone.

Recently, PRA produced what it claims is a statement from the credit card company that shows a debt incurred in 2010. What a coincidence! 2010 is when Pietrczak started his con on me. It is feasible that Pietrczak committed identity theft by using my credit card. Since I was not using the card, having gone to debit cards and cash, I would not look out for a bill. If a bill was sent to an address that we lived at, it could easily by intercepted by Pietrczak.

I think any juror who hears the recordings of the Pietrczak hearings and sees how inaccurate the transcript is will believe that Pietrczak had special favor from the Court. Collusion with the court coupled with Pietrczak’s criminal record, handwritten notes and sworn testimony in which he contradicts himself, is evidence of the plausibility that Pietrczak used one or more of my old credit cards. (All the while, I paid off thousands of dollars of debt for Pietrczak willingly, on the promise that he would reimburse me when he could.)

I want to play the recordings of the Pietrczak hearings to the jurors in the Portfolio Recovery Associates case. I doubt the court reporter will transcribe the dialogue when Mr. White leaned toward me and said “bitch” loud enough for me and the court observers to hear. The written transcript, even if accurate, cannot capture Judge Weaver’s tone of voice, snarky to me and sweet to Mr. White and Mr. Pietrczak.

I had a subpoena served on the court reporter.

Below is her brief in support of a motion to quash the subpoena. It is written on her behalf by the Office of Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge. It seems to me to be in violation of Civil Rules of Procedure Rule 1, Rule 11 and is a big waste of taxpayer dollars.

If the deputy attorney general actually made a reasonable inquiry into the facts of the case, he would encourage his “client” to email the files of the recordings. The AG would learn from the fiasco surrounding the oval office tapes that Nixon tried to keep from the public.

I won’t vote for Leslie Rutledge for Lt. Governor. She says what I want to hear, but in practice she defends government employees with facts and law that she knows or should know are not true. She may eventually file charges against Judge Weaver and court reporter Jana Perry for some kind of honest services fraud*, but to date, I have no reason to think Attorney General Rutledge pursues law and order when it comes to her cronies and the entrenched power elite.

*Assistant Attorney General Middlebrooks provided me with this information: “While the Attorney General does represent the state in criminal cases on appeal, it does not, to the best of my knowledge, do any prosecution at the trial level.”

I have contacted the FBI, Searcy County Sheriff, the Court Reporters Board and filed a civil rights action that was supposed to be read by Federal District Judge Wilson and the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals. I have yet to have anyone act even mildly interested in investigating what I believe is a serious infraction of the law.

By creating inaccurate records, the court personnel involved are making law obsolete in Arkansas. Worse, each and every citizen is subject to the whims of a greedy judge. Please do not vote for Susan Weaver for any office in Arkansas. She belongs in prison, not public office.