Arkansas Judge Violates Basic Due Process

For the next 30 days, I am writing an appellant’s brief in the Searcy County Arkansas case Pietrczak v. Me, 65-CV-21-20. I will post some of the highlights, as I work.

It is important to note that I reported Judge Susan Kaye Weaver to the Judicial Disciplinary and Disability Commission before the transcript of the first hearing was falsified. The JDDC declined to take action.

Federal Judge Billy Roy Wilson dismissed a case I filed regarding the falsification of the record. His order of dismissal was so deceptive, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed my appeal summarily, with no briefing allowed.

Perhaps if the courts hide facts from the public, the public will not become aware of the lack of integrity in the courts. Judges like Susan Weaver are given leave to unjustly transfer property from the elderly, often without summons served, to their favored attorneys’ clients with impunity.

Points of Appeal and Principal Authorities

1. The Court appeared to have a bias against the Appellant from before the first hearing and refused to recuse herself. All judicial officers who appear to have a bias must recuse themselves.

• United States Constitution Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause.

2. The Court participated in the falsification of the record in an attempt to legitimize legal errors and abuses of discretion. The transcripts are required to be verbatim records of what was said in court.

• United States Constitution Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause.

• Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 6

3. The Court refused to correct the record. This denied Appellant the most basic Constitutional right to due process.

• United States Constitution Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause.

• Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 6

4. The Court dismissed the Appellant with prejudice on March 28, 2022 and failed to dismiss the unrepresented Common Defense Doctrine Defendant. In the Court’s judgement against the defaulting defendant, the Court specifically made adverse rulings against the Appellant and seized Appellant’s property rights without allowing Appellant to defend herself. Arkansas has long recognized the common-defense doctrine, which provides that an answer that is timely filed by a co-defendant inures to the benefit of a defaulting co-defendant.

• Sutter v. Payne, 337 Ark. 330, 989 S.W.2d 887 (1999)