For those of you who cannot afford to purchase Federal Court documents from PACER, but are not poor enough to qualify for a fee waiver:

This is a mundane case about LLC members who allegedly ripped off one of the members. There are two important issues raised within.

One. What is the effect of wrongdoing by the clerk of the court and the judges condoning that misconduct?

Two. Is it a denial of due process for the court to deny pro se (self-represented) litigants assistance of counsel on a limited scope or for special appearances, while extending the right to people who can afford counsel to hire several firms, most with several attorneys and fully staffed with paralegals?

Here are the appellate brief, responses and excerpts of record produced by the defendants’ lawyers. I have not read through all of it yet. I did write all the plaintiff’s documents and read all the respondents’ trial court documents as they were filed.

I think the excerpts were not whittled down as required by court rules, but this puking up way too many words makes it easy to make the proceedings accessible to the public. I hope you find something helpful.

Email: bohemian_books@yahoo.com