Dear Counsel,

Troutman Pepper is well aware that the bill of sale offered as evidence of the alleged debt was not adequate proof, as I argued, because there was no reference to the -6049 account nor to me. 

New York District Court Approves Class Action in FDCPA Case Alleging Improper Debt Assignment Notification – Lexology

Assuming my appeal is successful, I intend to inform the jury that I incurred further damages during the pendency of the appeal. These include but are not limited to an increase in anxiety.

My sleep pattern is disrupted again, and I have had only about four hours of sleep per night for about three weeks. The sleep I have is filled with lucid dreams about traumatic experiences that I had buried by 2017.

While awake, I am ruminating on PRA’s implied threat that it will attack my husband, who keeps his finances completely separate from mine, which might cause discord in an amazing marriage.

The Court was wrong when he said suing PRA was my choice. Filing suit caused PRA to set the balance to zero, regardless if it was a waiver with an IRC violation or an admission that the debt arose from a data error or fraud. Filing suit presumably would stop PRA from making further annoying phone calls to me after the 30 day verification period. PRA said it stopped calling the -6000 number in 2013, then started calling it again seven years later.

If you know any other way to get PRA to stop calling a person forever, other than suing Portfolio Recovery or giving them an extorted payment, let me know.

Thank you,

Laura Lynn Hammett

***********************

Please leave your comments below, or email bohemian_books@yahoo.com