First, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. had less time to speak than Biden and Trump. For some inexplicable reason, he was not given the rebuttal minute. I think that because of his neurological disability that makes speech difficult, he should have received more time, not less. (My experience is that when a person’s language center in his brain malfunctions it does not mean that person has impaired reasoning.)

My enthusiasm for RFK is dampened by perhaps petty annoyances. For instance, once I gave my telephone number to his campaign, it was difficult to get them to stop contacting me incessantly. Not nearly as hard as it was to get Portfolio Recovery Associates to stop calling me – I didn’t even threaten a lawsuit on RFK. I blocked one number and the campaign texts stopped. Whereas PRA had an endless number of lines to call from and blocking one number just made another number pop up.

It was not fair for Kennedy to have a live studio audience cheering for him, when the other two candidates did not get to use that cheap device for persuasion.

The meat of the issues though is which person has the best morality, intellect and health. Kennedy wins on all three.

RFK has fought for environmental protection and against big businesses. Biden is a career politician who has some shady deals going on with his son and billion-dollar foreign companies. Trump appointed Walmart counsel Lee P. Rudofsky to a lifetime position on the judiciary. Rudofsky apparently is using his position to encourage the nation’s second largest debt buyer, a customer of Walmart’s, to ignore its obligation to validate or verify the accuracy of the non-performing loans it buys before making collection calls.

RFK is an avid outdoorsman. Trump and Biden argued over who had the best golf skills. Golf is an elitist game reserved for people who can spend as much on a round as the rest of us spend for a week of groceries. We need public access to open spaces – not exclusive golf clubs.

If I was the judge of which of the three candidates is truly a man of faith, I would decide RFK. Is he without sin? No! Am I certain that he is running for office to fulfil God’s will for him? I am skeptical. I am 100% certain that the motivations driving Trump and Biden are ego, money and power.

RFK gave some real solutions for three problems closest to my heart. Trump and Biden made broad claims of superiority and slung invective epithets at each other.

On substance abusers, Kennedy intends to build free rural rehabilitation facilities. (I named my trust that Judge Susan Weaver pillaged “the Rural Revival Living Trust”. The property in the trust was meant to be used as a retreat for people who were having trouble coping in the city – and were willing to change.)

On childcare, Kennedy proposes using half the military budget to fund affordable options. He also endorses school choice, such as charter schools.

On corruption in government, presumably meaning the courts as well, RFK expressed zero tolerance for lying officials. Under Kennedy’s proposal, Lee P. Rudofsky would be fired. (See the unfinished series on this blog about Lee P. Rudofsky’s web of deceit.)

We should not base our vote on a person’s physical appearance, or even prowess. But dementia is a physiological ailment. Biden exhibits extreme signs of cognitive degeneration. My personal experience is that my “brain fog” was lifted by a drastic change in my diet and diligence in pursuit of better health. Biden is losing it. He has the finest free health care in the world, and the physicians have not had any success in reversing or even stopping the degenerative disease that seems to afflict our current head of state.

Hopefully Robert F. Kennedy is sincere. If he is, he is by far the best viable option for President.

It is worth your time to listen to the “Real Debate”.