Does Anyone Believe This UAMS BS?

“No such video evidence has ever existed in UAMS’ possession”? Then why does UAMS try to have patients sign this consent form?

“[C]ertain patient care areas in the Emergency Department are continuously monitored by videorecording for the purpose of [] patient safety.” It would have helped keep Sean safe had there been video of him before he was administered Fentanyl and bound to a cot. Then doctors, such as Dr. Joseph Margolick and Dr. Mary Kimbrough would not be able to get away with chemically restraining and battering Sean as easily.

Will the Arkansas Claims Commission let the government’s attorneys get away with tacit approval of the spoliation of evidence?

My guess as a less naive entering 1L student is yes, the Claims Commission will allow them to get away with it. But the answer should be “no”.

What do you think? Please comment.