The Lawyer and the Lazy Judge: How Susan Weaver Runs a Courtroom
I am not lazy. I am busy.
Today’s Doc of the Day is a link instead of a doc. Click here.
I wish I saw this article before I wrote my appellate brief for Micheal Pietrczak v. Laura Lynn, et al. Not that being right and having the best authorities helps in Arkansas. My litigation adversary represented by William Zac White of Heber Springs did not even bother to file an opposition brief and the COA has not made a ruling in the seven months since the appellee’s response was due.
The article discusses the difference between Federal court, where the judge writes the orders and judgments, and Arkansas courts, which allow the prevailing party to write the orders and judgment as a draft, and the judge usually just rubber stamps it.
Judge Susan Weaver takes it a step further. She will fail to rule on a motion if she does not like the only reasonable outcome, then use the excuse for her dereliction of duty that she is waiting on the litigant to draft the order.
But, if she wants to dismiss a counterclaim even though the counter defendant failed to file any response, she goes ahead and does that sua sponte, without giving a logical reason.
She did these things to me.
She also granted a written motion allowing Pietrczak an extension of time to serve a summons without giving me time to respond in writing and said the written order is the same as her oral order. It was not.
The article addresses this same unethical behavior. “Finally, when opposing counsel submits an order to the court, objections should be made quickly to any substance.”
I objected, but to no avail.
Court Reporter Jana Perry went along with the ploy and fictionalized what was said in the hearing. Then Judge Weaver, Attorney General Leslie Rutlege, the Court of Appeals and even federal district court judges, Billy Roy Wilson and Lee Rudofsky all made excuses why the public should not hear the recording that would not follow the transcript.
Hmmm?
More Crappy Childhood Fairy Open Practice: How to Cope with a Corrupt Judge Like Lee P. Rudofsky
A few days back, I shared a method of writing about fears and resentments in order to release them. Read about the practice that I learned on a website called The Crappy Childhood Fairy on my previous “How to Cope with a Corrupt Judge Like Lee P. Rudofsky” here.
In the spirit of CoDA (Co-Dependents Anonymous) I am sharing my practice from this morning with you, my readers.
CoDA is another helpful tool to deal with difficult people like narcissists and try to find what in us is attracting those relationships. I went to meetings and a home group for about three years. I wish I did not stop when I was feeling “cured”. It may have saved me from being in a six-year relationship with an alcoholic, fraudster who brought prostitutes into our home. (My current husband is a dream come true. We can learn and change and find a happy ending.)
My handwritten note, above, says:
“Fear I did not get enough sleep last night. I fear I will be tired all day. I fear I will not be able to do my court work. I fear my anxiety will increase and I won’t be able to fall asleep tonight. I resent PRA and Judge Rudofsky for making a simple case so difficult by lying and colluding. I resent not having a fair and honest judiciary. I fear people with positions as judges will force me into bankruptcy. I fear that my body and mind won’t carry me through building up my retirement fund again. I resent that I have been a hardworking, productive member of society and will spend my old age in poverty.
“I am now ready and humbly ask that you, God, remove these fears and resentments. I pray to know your will for me today, and have the strength to carry it out.”
Now it is time to ritually release these resentments and fears by soaking the paper in water, wadding it up and throwing it out.
I suggest you write your practice by hand, instead of typing on a computer keyboard. First, handwriting is said to access a certain part of our brains that does not happen with typing. Second, I would hate for you to have to smash your computer with a baseball bat or throw your cell phone in the toilet to accomplish the ritual release.
How I Cope with a Corrupt Judge Like Lee Rudofsky, Susan Weaver or Alan Friedenthal (deceased)
You’d think that the passing of retired in disgrace California Commissioner Alan Friedenthal would end the need to “cope”.
The problem with corrupt judges is that they have power to destroy lives and cancel the culture for which the rest of us peasants voted.
Friedenthal forced me to cease all communications with my two sons. We were completely separated; the way people complain that children of allegedly illegal immigrants are torn from their mothers and fathers.
I was not forced to live in a cage, but there was the threat of incarceration if I disobeyed the misogynistic, reported abuser of women and children. Because he was appointed to the bench, he wielded that much power.
My now adult children had their childhoods ruined and struggle emotionally and financially. This is a constant reminder of the damage done by the evil judge.
Judge Susan Weaver of Arkansas merely transferred $200,000 of my property to the alcoholic with whom I spent six grueling years of my life. She ignored his handwritten signed note that gave step-by-step instructions on how his father and attorney William Zac White would defraud me of what they hoped to be three times their haul.
Living without property is easier than living without children. But I am 60 years old and live on a $630 per month pension. $200,000 would make a huge difference in my anticipation of the future.
Lee Rudofsky, on a trajectory to the Supreme Court if we don’t stop him, used the rules of procedure as a sword against me, while purposefully misinterpreting and misstating my testimony. He failed to warn me that the company he represented prior to judgeship, Walmart, issued credit cards in collaboration with a finance company and their bad debts were sold to the defendant in my case, debt collector Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, for pennies on the dollar. It is likely both buyer and seller knew the portfolios were riddled with errors.
Rudofsky dismissed my case summarily, meaning without allowing it to go to a jury, and will probably make me pay the costs of the billion-dollar collectors.
On a grander scale, Rudofsky is paving the way for debt collectors to ignore the FDCPA completely and condoning their spoliation of evidence.
I have previously written about spiritual coping mechanisms I use. Yoga, meditation, prayer…these are all good.
Writing is also therapeutic. It is good to share experience with others. WordPress is a free or cheap forum.
I suggest you try sharing your experience concerning these and other bad judges. You can start by writing in the comments section below.
There are also government agencies to whom you can write complaints. In California they are called the Commission on Judicial Performance. Arkansas has the JDDC. “If your complaint is against a federal circuit judge, federal district judge, federal bankruptcy judge, or federal magistrate judge, you must file the complaint at the clerk’s office of the United States court of appeals for the regional circuit in which the judge serves.” (https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/faqs-filing-judicial-conduct-or-disability-complaint#faq-Where-do-I-file-my-complaint?)
A conduct or ethics complaint is not a way to get bad decisions overturned. You will only be helping the next guy in line.
If you want to write a complaint about Judge Susan Weaver or Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, or any other judge, I am happy to proofread your complaint. I am not an attorney and not allowed to give legal advice. I am allowed to give encouragement, share my personal experience, and help you express yourself.
Contact me at bohemian_books@yahoo.com.
Mystery Solved: Why Judge Lee P. Rudofsky Appears to Favor Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC over Me
Today you get two FREE Docs of the Day. One is a background report written by the Alliance for Justice on Federal District Judge Lee P. Rudofsky written soon after then President Donald Trump nominated him to his lifetime position.
I am a Christian Libertarian Populist, so I agree with many but not all of Judge Rudofsky’s stated opinions. He panders to Christian conservatives and pretends to be a Federalist, but he is openly anti-populist. I say “stated opinions” because I think Mr. Rudofsky is disingenuous. He may disagree with me, but I think his “opinions” are motivated by a political power grab, and allegiance to big business and the moneyed elite.
Judge Rudofsky presides over my FDCPA (Federal Debt Collection Practices Act) case against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. The Cornell and Harvard educated judge acts like he is mentally challenged. He misquotes and misinterprets simple English, always in a way that benefits PRA. He accepts the most transparent lies as truth. So much for “veritas”.
Why the apparent bias?
According to the AFJ:
“Rudofsky worked on a 2016 article titled ‘The CFPB’s unconstitutional power grab,’ which examined the D.C. Circuit’s decision in PHH Corporation v. CFPB. The decision, written by then-judge Brett Kavanaugh, held in part that the statute creating the CFPB was unconstitutional as it related to the President’s lack of authority to fire the single-director except for ‘inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.’
“However, in January 2018, the D.C. Circuit reheard the claim en banc and held, ‘[b]ecause we see no constitutional defect in Congress’s choice to bestow on the CFPB Director protection against removal except for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” we sustain it.’ The court recognized Congress’s intent in protecting consumers following the 2008 financial crisis and concluded that ‘[n]o relevant consideration gives us reason to doubt the constitutionality of the independent CFPB’s single-member structure. Congress made constitutionally permissible institutional design choices for the CFPB with which courts should hesitate to interfere.’
“The CFPB serves a vital role in protecting consumers and Rudofsky’s labeling of the actions of this agency as an ‘unconstitutional power grab’ raises serious concerns.”
I am preparing for an appeal of Judge Rudofsky’s orders on my case and took a close look at some evidence entered in another case against Portfolio Recovery. (That case was settled confidentially of course.)
One of PRA’s lies in my case was that a written interrogation it sent to me was “NOT” an attempt to collect a debt. The affidavit that I was supposed to fill out asked for my social security number, birthdate, driver’s license, and the details of who I suspected used my credit card fraudulently, any police reports I filed and if I was willing to assist in the prosecution of the 9-year-old fraud. (As if they haven’t heard of a statute of limitations and think I might still have the documentation to prove what happened in another State a decade back.) I was supposed to have it notarized or witnessed.
They sent a similar letter to an old lady named Loretta Burks. Ms. Burks filled it out and it didn’t help her one bit. PRA continued suing her and won by default. (Ms. Burks got representation and had the judgment set aside and filed the FDCPA action.)
Look at the fraud affidavit posted below. Check out page 7. The institution that issued one of the fraudulent accounts was “Portfolio Recovery/GE Capital Retail Walmart”. On page 2, Mrs. Burks’ response to the lawsuit against her included, “[t]his acct. was proven fraud before portfolio assoc. assumed it.”
Now look at page 1 of the AFJ background report, in the biography section. Judge Rudofsky was an assistant general counsel at Walmart and worked his way up from there.
I didn’t even realize Walmart issued credit cards. I live under a rock.
It seems to me that there is a conflict of interest where a defendant debt buyer purchased a bunch of junk debt from the judge’s former employer. Call me crazy.
I was watching a random trial in California years back. The dignified looking judge was listening to opening arguments intently. There was an accounting of some kind projected on a screen. The judge stopped the attorney suddenly and said, (paraphrased) “I am probably ok to continue, but I think I should let you know that the accountant who signed that document did my taxes for me, and we sometimes see each other at a party. We are just acquainted, but I think I should be transparent in case you think a motion for recusal is in order.” The attorneys declined to ask for a recusal.
Hey. I am going to take my case to the Court of Appeals. I am right, but PRA’s army of attorneys will probably annihilate me. This is not David and Goliath. This is David and 1,000 goliaths.
Any good and brave attorney who wants to help, hit me up at bohemian_books@yahoo.com.
How I Cope with a Corrupt Judge Like Lee P. Rudofsky of The Federal District Court
My most popular post over the past year was “How I Cope with a Corrupt Judge Like Susan K. Weaver of Arkansas”.
One of my readers who is now a close friend led me to another mental health tool since I wrote that post. In lieu of the Doc of the Day, I am sharing a link to the website that teaches this coping device, “The Crappy Childhood Fairy“. The basic program is free.
This is a way to deal with fears and resentments by writing and meditation. (Meditation to me is akin to prayer.)
For example, I might write:
I feel resentment toward Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. I fear that he will continue to pretend to miscomprehend my arguments and testimony in order to write orders that look legitimate on their face. I fear the justices on the court of appeals will also justify showing partiality. I fear the work that is required to appeal will be a waste of time. I resent attorneys David Mitchell of Rose Law Firm, Jed Komisin and James Trefil of Troutman Pepper. I fear they will use Judge Rudofsky’s political and ideological bias to the advantage of their client, a debt collector that is notorious for using illegal or unethical litigation tactics. I fear they may force me into bankruptcy and ruin my outstanding credit. I fear that there is little justice to be had in this once great nation any longer.
Since no one will read the handwritten note before I douse it in water, wad it up and throw in the trash, I get a little more personal, too.
Next, I write my prayer to God. “I am now ready and humbly ask that you, God, remove these fears and resentments. I pray to know your will for me today, and to have the strength to carry it out.”
After the writing and symbolic release ritual, which could be burning the notes, but wetting them seems less dangerous, I sit on my yoga mat and meditate. I use the mantra “release”. Honestly, I suck at meditation. My mind always wanders back to the torment Judge Rudofsky and the Three Henchmen put me through and all the work I need to do to stop them. But, when I notice, I come back to the mantra. “Release.”
I’ve only used this technique for a week. My outlook is improving. I see that some of my fears are about losing the wonderful things I have in my life now. So, it makes sense to appreciate and enjoy those things now. And it helps me to look at the job God gave me as a gift rather than a burden. My all time most popular post was written the day the Commission on Judicial Performance made a “severe” public admonishment against Court Commissioner Alan Friedenthal, the liberal Democrat version of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, based upon my complaint. I wouldn’t trade that victory for a million bucks. (It saved others from suffering the way my children and I did at the hand of the corrupt judge.)
I hope you gain as much from the practice as I have. If you want to share your experience privately, email bohemian_books@yahoo.com. Otherwise, feel free to comment below.
Complaint About Abusive Defense Tactics by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC Sent to the CFPB
If you filed a suit under the FDCPA against any of the PRA Group, Inc subsidiaries, and they bullied you into settlement, let the CFPB know about the debt buyer’s abusive practices.
For instance, it is extremely rare for the debt collector accused of violations of the FDCPA to be paid attorney fees, even if they win, but PRA threatened to ask for attorney fees from me if I did not settle for nothing.
Here is the complaint I sent. This is not legal advice. I am just letting you know you are not alone.
If you want confidentiality that the CFPB cannot give you, but you want to share your story so other FDCPA plaintiffs know what to expect, tell me about your experience at bohemian_books@yahoo.com and I will incorporate it into a blog post, removing identifying details. I am also glad to help edit complaints for spelling, punctuation and to make them easier to understand.
Here is mine:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC violated most of the options listed on the complaint form at https://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/ while trying to collect an alleged debt of $2,297.63 from 2010, but my main complaint is not one of the listed options. I know PRA has done similar things to many people, including Guadalupe Mejia, who was awarded $82 million in punitive damages by a jury in 2016. This issue should be addressed.
My main complaint is that after I filed a lawsuit under the FDCPA, invasion of privacy on seclusion and outrage, on March 10, 2021, PRA used litigation tactics that were unethical, illegal, deceitful and meant to inflict severe emotional distress.
PRA was represented by outside counsel, The Rose Law Firm in Arkansas and Troutman Pepper from Virginia (AKA Troutman Sanders).
On April 3, 2023, Troutman Pepper issued a blog post that said, in part: “According to the CFPB, entities cannot take unreasonable advantage of circumstances where people lack sufficient bargaining power to protect their interests.
“The policy statement describes such circumstances as when consumers do not elect to enter into a relationship with an entity,” and specifies debt collectors.
PRA used my lack of legal training, financial distress caused by the COVID related stock market crash, and my ill health, including diagnosed anxiety disorders and Hashimoto’s Disease, to bully me in court. PRA also capitalized on the opportunity of a judge who is notoriously anti-consumer and anti-CFPB, Judge Lee P. Rudofsky.
PRA threatened me with having to pay its “significant” attorney’s fees. A copy of the email is submitted. PRA filed a motion for the Clerk to tax $8,356.18 in costs to me. I am going to appeal the summary judgment, but thus far, PRA has ignored my request for them to stipulate to a stay of the cost motions until after the appeal.
PRA has never produced Old Account Level Documentation that shows what was purchased to incur the debt or the vendor who was paid by Capital One Bank. PRA has never produced a credit card agreement and specified it does not have the credit card agreement.
Before I filed suit, PRA sent its identity theft and fraud letter to me, with directions to answer the intrusive questions under penalty of perjury and notarized or witnessed. I refused because PRA did not tell me where the debt was incurred or what it was for. Even if I could deduce who committed the fraud, the statute of limitations to file criminal charges on the person had passed, and it would be extraordinarily difficult to collect evidence. The only purpose I saw in having me fill out the details, including my social security number, all previous addresses, and so on, was for PRA to use against me in trying to collect the debt. The letter was backdated.
After I filed suit, PRA sent three more backdated letters that said it “concluded its investigation” and closed my account and set the balance to zero. But the first letter informing me of this was addressed to “Laura Lyman” instead of “Laura Lynn” and had a different account number on it. I was fooled into thinking my account was closed. When I went to document the letter, I noticed the error. When I asked for a correction, PRA changed the wording. After my next request, they gave me another letter with the original wording and with my name and account number. Copies submitted.
Eight months after I filed suit, PRA produced a single account statement mailed to an address where I never received mail, that showed a balance of $1,916.05. They said Capital One gave it to them and got Capital One to submit an affidavit, but Capital One had told me many months earlier that it had no OALD at all. (Recorded)
PRA withheld and altered other documents. The company records filed under seal do not have each call made on PRA’s self-generated phone log documented on PRA’s notes. A representative told me the notes have an entry that I filed for bankruptcy, though I never filed for bankruptcy. That entry is not in the documents filed under seal.
PRA admits to calling a landline at my past residence in Arkansas hundreds of times. But, it claims it did not call my California cell phone for a seven year stretch with the first call they admit to being on November 18, 2020. I recorded that call, after setting up my computer. (There is a minute pause on PRA’s recording of the call.) The reason I spoke to PRA on a recorded line was because they had called me about a hundred times from August to November. About 85 of those calls I blocked and they went to voice mail.
PRA would not produce a third party record of its calls. I got my cell phone record and found fourteen calls that came from PRA, that don’t appear on PRA’s phone log, and each of the numbers those calls were placed from were disconnected. In fact, all the numbers PRA called me from were disconnected.
Judge Rudofsky, in his order granting summary judgment in PRA’s favor, truncated a sentence to distort my testimony, then PRA repeated the falsehood. Eventually the judge admitted the sentence was truncated, and then said the complete sentence had a different meaning than the meaning given by ChatGBT’s OpenAI and the opposite of what I meant.
PRA requested and Judge Rudofsky approved of making many of the business records under seal, against my heavy protest. It is difficult to write this complaint and complaints to other agencies with the confidentiality restrictions and the public cannot make an informed decision about who is telling the truth. That is why I am using the awkward way of saying what was not in the documents, instead of what was in the documents.
After I filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the single issue of misrepresentation of the amount of a debt, PRA lied, saying it “waived” my debt “in light of the litigation”, even though it did not issue a 1099-C to me in the two years since.
PRA hired an “expert witness” who is a hired gun. He made a diagnosis that contradicted the diagnosis of my medical providers. The Psychiatrist they hired was not licensed in Arkansas, and the Arkansas medical board told me (recorded) that out-of-state doctors can review records, but not diagnose. The report is filed under seal and I am only allowed to share it with law enforcement and the various medical boards and committees on professional conduct. But I am willing to share my version of what happened during the horrific Defense Medical Exam with the CFPB in confidentiality.
PRA posted my credit report, marked “CONFIDENTIAL”, and another document that had my full unredacted social security number and birthdate on PACER. When I complained, they said it was an accident.
There is so much detail that I will give the case number and my blog address, where I write about the case and other instances of corruption in courts. I will then make bullet points of specific misconduct on my request for a fair resolution.
Federal District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 4:21-cv-00189-LPR.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC should file a notice in our case, explaining to the court each lie, deceptive statement and falsification of documentation they or their client made during the proceedings. This should include:
1. That letters to me were backdated, though there is deposition testimony from PRA in another case where they say their letters are dated on the day they are mailed.
2. All OALD. The number showing in hyperlinks on the records under seal is not zero or one.
3. PRA should admit that the number of calls logged on its self-generated phone log is not the same as the number of calls recorded in collection notes.
4. In particular, that a call I received on February 18, 2021 from PRA, which was recorded by PRA, does not show on either the phone log nor the collection notes. PRA hung up on me when I told them to hang-on for me to turn on my recorder, and I recorded the next call.
5. PRA should tell the court its policy about issuing 1099-Cs which is in policy manuals CFPB has obtained through its investigations of PRA that led to the 2015 consent agreement and 2023 consent order.
6. PRA should admit that I emailed them plentiful evidence that their lies about me having significant gambling losses from online, and therefore illegal poker playing, are false. They also submitted many of my blog posts as exhibits. They should submit the post that says I published my book subtitled “What it Takes to Play Poker Without Losing Your Assets.”
This is not an exhaustive list. PRA should stipulate to reversing the judgment and going to a jury trial. For any other impeachment evidence I produce, which the jury agrees proved a lie, PRA should agree to pay $100,000 per item above what the jury awards.
The wording of the closing letters taken with the extortionist settlement offer that allows PRA to pursue “future” debts gives me a reasonable inference that PRA plans to attempt to collect a further alleged debt. PRA should agree to a no contact order for the remainder of my life. My credit has no reportable derogatory comments. Any other alleged debt PRA claims is outside the statute of limitations for legal collection. I do not want to be forced to endure PRA’s abusive collection activity ever again. PRA should mark any further accounts that allegedly belong to me as “do not contact”.
Doc of the Day: Attachments
Doc of the Day: What We Really Want to Say to Debt Collection Attorneys (And Other Sleazy Liars)
My new work bestie is a dog named Noods. She feels the same way as me about annoying phone calls.
I filed a lawsuit under the FDCPA, just to get a company called Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC to stop calling me. They are a debt buyer and collector that are notorious for collecting on non-existent debts. They buy electronic data files with millions or hundreds of millions of lines of error filled portfolios.
It was getting monotonous signing off on emails to PRA’s attorneys at Rose Law Firm and Troutman Pepper, regards, regards, regards. “Respectfully” was not an option. So, I asked Noods for ideas.
Let’s get authentic.
Aren’t you sick of listening to lawyers, and sometimes judges, who drone on stringing together meaningless words – or as Judge Rudofsky, giving words new meaning?
Here is something refreshing. A judge who says what she is thinking.
Judge Colleen McMahon.
Sending her gratitude and respect.
Check out the fun Reels by Noodles the Pooch Here.
Judge Lee P. Rudofsky’s Biased Opinion: Free Doc of the Day, Transcript of Hearing on MSJ
The transcript of the hearing on my motion for partial summary judgment and the dueling MSJ filed by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC is posted below.
[On Friday night, July 7 at 5:59 p.m., attorneys for Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC sent an email to me. I was sitting out back under the porch, watching a light rain and a grand rainbow, destressing from reading PRA’s latest pack of lies. When I went back to writing for the night (because my hubby was fishing), I opened the email. The version of the transcript I had posted was an unredacted version. There is a redacted version which I am posting tonight in its stead. I got the unredacted version off PACER minutes before I posted it on June 28, 2023. Please let me know if you were one of the readers who downloaded the unredacted version. You should delete it. Thank you and I am sorry for any inconvenience this causes you.]
(The usual $3 per document maximum charge on PACER does not apply to transcripts, so the value of the free document is $13.50. In my spare time I will address the inequity of charging pro se litigants to download copies of their file stamped documents from PACER. Also, how charging the average person to browse through federal district court files discourages the transparency that is supposed to be a cornerstone in our justice system.)
Read the transcript as if you are on a jury. Would you be reasonable to believe that I was telling the truth?
Did PRA call me hundreds of times, more times than they admitted to? Or did I decide to take a full minute to set up a video recording of our call on November 18, 2020, without having received any calls from the same people in the months leading up?
At the time PRA “investigated” my alleged debt, before I filed my lawsuit, did they have any documentation supporting the debt. Or did they base their investigation on one line item in a portfolio of untold thousands or millions of line items that are known to be inaccurate?
Judge Rudofsky decided that no reasonable juror could believe I had a case, and no reasonable juror could agree with me that I had no debt to Portfolio Recovery, nor that the numbers they claimed did not add up.
If you happen to read this transcript of a hearing held in front of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky and you are opposing confirmation of a promotion of Judge Rudofsky, feel free to contact me at bohemian_books@yahoo.com. I’d love to talk. [My attorney and I presume potential attorneys may have access to the unredacted version of all the case documents. Maybe we can form a symbiotic relationship.]
Free Doc of the Day: Motion in Limine to Exclude Report of Dr. Sanjay Adhia Hired Gun of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Busy Busy Busy.
I am preparing for my post judgment activity in the case against PRA Group, Inc’s wholly owned subsidiary. PRA Group, Inc. has $2.6 billion dollars of credit extended to it, which it can use to try to destroy me in court. So, fighting them is a daunting task.
Here is a motion to file a motion in limine that was mooted when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky granted the debt buyer’s motion for summary judgment.
Awfully convenient that PRA will not need to defend Dr. Adhia’s indefensible conduct in this case. Look for PRA II, which will address the “moot” conduct.
If you are a plaintiff’s attorney in Texas, Virginia or Arkansas and want to get involved in the suit, contact me at bohemian_books@yahoo.com or TheNext55Years@gmail.com.
P.S. Judge Rudofsky denied my motion to file my documents electronically. This increased my costs in time and money. I was required to drive to the courthouse 30 miles from home and deliver the documents in triplicate, plus make a copy for myself if I wanted a stamped copy before leaving.
I say this because two random pages from Dr. Adhia’s CV were attached at the end of this document by accident, and I was not the one who entered them.
[UPDATE] The Brief in Support is also posted. It is similar to the motion, adding a bit of authority and importantly, exhibits. If you have time to kill, look up each case on Dr. Adhia’s resume. He represented the losing party predominately.
A Higher Law 