Everyone is a Critic: William Zac White Included
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Laura Lynn
Cc:Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Sat, Apr 16 at 12:34 PM
I do not want your courtesy. I have blocked you from all means of communication with my office. Send me a summons or just go away. Put that on your worthless blog. Last warning.
***************************************
That was his last “last warning”. Here are a few more culled from various emails he sent to me. Cut and pasted. The errors are the esteemed attorney’s. Bold added.
***************************************
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Laura Lynn
Cc:Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Fri, Mar 18 at 10:07 AM
All of them. Consider this your only cease abs desist warning. I like reading how other courts around the country have admonished your behavior. Already dealing with the office of professional conduct. I have asked to file a complaint against you.
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Tammy Weaver
Cc:Laura Lynn,Jana Perry,Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Thu, Mar 31 at 7:52 AM
Ms Hammett,
I have instructed you not to communicate with me or my office staff since you are no longer a party to this action and there is no legitimate reason for you to contact us. I have had enough of your threats. I do not care who you email but do not include me or my staff members. I am done with you and trying to move on civilly. This is your last warning.
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Laura Lynn
Cc:Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Sat, Apr 16 at 12:29 PM
I will do no such thing. You made the record a convoluted and ridiculous. I will not agree to help you or your “case” in anyway. I will never meet you in person unless I subpoena you and your husband for depositions or your criminal contempt trial. Once again do not contact my office. As I mentioned I will be filing a police report for your incessant harassment. Do yourself a favor and go away before I take an actual interest in putting you in jail. You lost deal with it. Next time you should not try to evade child support with your hair brained schemes. Last warning. Do not contact my office again.
***************************************************
About the use of a trust to protect assets, I found an article on the Experian website. Here is a quote from work by Erica Sandberg:
“With a revocable trust, your assets will not be protected from creditors looking to sue. That’s because you maintain ownership of the trust while you’re alive. Therefore if you lose a lawsuit and a judgment is awarded to the creditor, the trust may have to be closed and the money handed over.”
I am not an attorney. William White is an attorney.
If he dismissed the trust and won against me, he could probably have reached the assets in the trust. (That may be why Willy didn’t issue a summons directed to the trust for six months.) But he dismissed me and won against the trust by default (because no attorney would take the case and jeopardize his career with the wrath of Judge Weaver).
Now the Court of Appeals will need to decide if the trustee, beneficiary and settlor of a living trust is allowed to present testimony and evidence at a hearing on damages when the trust is not represented but the trustee is a joint defendant, is present and prepared to present evidence.
Justice would be served if Judge Weaver had imputed my defenses on the defaulting joint defendant, especially because I owned the property held in the trust.
But why talk about Justice and Judge Weaver in the same sentence?
Who Owns Arkansas?
It is election season. “Vote for Me” signs line the roadways. Stacks of circulars clutter the mail.
There is one “quality” claimed by a few of the candidates. They brag on how many generations have lived in Arkansas.
Being from the lineage of those who displaced the native Americans seems to be a badge of honor.
Attorney William Z. White of Heber Springs brags on his website that “Zac is a sixth-generation Arkansan”.
Judge Susan Weaver’s family goes way back in the state also.
I am a transplant to Arkansas. I am a native Californian and understand why people who already live in an area would want to put up a wall.
But on the same advertisements for political office, the candidates claim to want to stimulate the economy and attract businesses. There is an upside to population growth.
My experience is that I moved to Arkansas with enough assets to retire modestly. Always hoping to contribute, I helped renovate a community building at a cost to me of $45,000 and I fixed up an empty house in Saline County. Yet, seven years after moving to Arkansas, I am close to broke.
A big percentage of my losses were COVID related. But the remainder of losses are due to a corrupt Arkansas judge.
I am the beneficiary of a trust that held a property worth somewhere between $199,000 and $350,000. I planned to sell that property and split the sales price 50/50 with my former partner. Judge Weaver transferred title of that property to my former partner, one of William Zac White’s clients, with a huge chunk of it going to attorney fees, of course.
Judge Weaver would not allow me to testify about how my former partner defrauded me and allegedly stole money from me, swore under penalty of perjury he would reimburse me for the hundreds of thousands of dollars of capital he took from me, and convinced me to put title of the property into a trust rather than my own name.
Judge Weaver said that speaking the truth about the situation would be the unauthorized practice of law. I was a co-defendant in the lawsuit filed by William White, but he said he intended to dismiss me, and Judge Weaver used that as an excuse to muzzle me.
Who owns Arkansas? Not the newcomer.
Do not bring your life savings to Arkansas with the intent to retire. The clans that have been here for generations will make protecting your assets a full-time job or drain your bank accounts through attorney fees. It’s a stinking shame.
Submit Your Nominations for Dumbest Idea Ever Concocted by An Attorney
Here is my nomination. Try to beat it.
Attorney William Z. White filed an untenable lawsuit against me on behalf of the man who defrauded me of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The fraudster client convinced me he thought of me as his “wife in the eyes of God” and we would spend the rest of our lives together. He then borrowed over $260,000 with no intention of paying it back.
I began to realize the fraud. I said I was breaking up and not giving the fraudster any more money.
He convinced me to stay with him by signing a contract that said if we broke up we would split our assets, other than my share in a family owned company, 50/50.
After the fraudster was caught buying the services of hookers, I threatened to break up again.
Fraudster convinced me to stay by transferring title in the property bought with my money to a trust. I was the trustee and the beneficiary. To give the fraudster some protection, we wrote a mortgage for the amount we paid for the property. I even agreed to an interest payment that was legal usury.
After the fraudster nearly killed himself in a drunk driving accident, I broke up. I didn’t want to be collateral damage and I was not willing to put up with the sexual infidelity.
Step in Willy White.
(Well, an attorney who is now a judge, Billy Jack Gibson, represented the fraudster at first. He did not file a lawsuit for the fraudster.)
White filed a suit in 2018, naming me as an individual and the trust. He used the character chain “and/or” for all the claims against the trust.
The suit was dismissed in 2020 for lack of prosecution.
Then White came up with a plan. He used a similar plan on a case where he represented Richard Gawenis. It didn’t work out well for them in the Gawenis case, but try, try again.
White refiled the case against me and didn’t serve a summons. He was going to ask Judge Weaver to give him default judgment.
Judge Susan Weaver gave default judgment to revoke a trust on the Gawenis case even though the trustee of the trust involved was not served summons or notified. If that was an isolated case, I’d say it was due to Judge Weaver being less than the brightest bulb. Since Weaver was already made aware of the error by a licensed attorney, and she set aside the order, it looks like Weaver was colluding with White when he tried the same act a second time.
On my case, Attorney White didn’t even issue a summons for the trust defendant.
Unfortunately for the conspirators, I noticed the second lawsuit on Court Connect on my own.
I fought Weaver and White for about 9 months. It was obvious they were colluding.
Finally, White sent me a couple boxes of documents I requested through discovery. One paper was a letter written by the fraudster and signed that described the plan to defraud me more.
I presented the letter to Judge Weaver.
Here is the dumbest idea I’ve heard of concocted by an attorney. Since the attorney couldn’t beat me in court, even with an unethical and/or moronic judge, he dismissed me with prejudice.
I am not allowed to represent the trust, because that would be considered the unauthorized practice of law.
There is not a single attorney amongst the dozens I asked who would represent the trust. The honest ones said it was for fear of retaliation by Judge Weaver. The others said they were too busy to earn $300 per hour from me.
So, the trust lost by default.
Willy White looked like Pinocchio when the wooden headed boy got applause from his first performance. Pinocchio was clapping and laughing with the crowd, so proud of himself.
Here is where the plan fell apart.
A dismissal with prejudice means it was on the merits. Since the non-defaulting party prevailed on the merits, the joint defaulting defendant should also be dismissed. There was no merit to the joint claims.
Since the claim was that I and the trust clouded title to the fraudster’s property and trespassed on it, and I “proved” that I did not trespass or cloud title, the statements in the complaint that I and the trust did anything must be deemed false. The trust must also be dismissed. It would be a second dismissal, so it would be with prejudice.
Judge Weaver acted like she is not aware that default judgment is not mandatory and that the judge should use discretion when handing out default damages.
Judge Weaver knew there was an avalanche of evidence against the fraudster. But it is so much fun for Judge Weaver to “play” with other people’s trust funds. (She was quoted by the Democrat Gazette as saying so.) Judge Weaver gave the property that may be worth $350,000 to the fraudster, and then said she approved the transfer of the asset to an irrevocable trust designed by William White.
To make it look like there was some reason for giving the property to the fraudster, Judge Weaver wrote in her order that I did all the bad things that were claimed in the complaint, even though I was dismissed on the merits.
Hopefully the Court of Appeals will reverse the erroneous ruling and dismiss the case against all defendants. Then I won’t need to file a malicious prosecution and fraudulent transfer case to recover the property.
The dumbest idea I have heard of concocted by an attorney is to dismiss one joint defendant who has his him on the ropes with the expectation that the defaulting joint defendant will lose on the exact same claims, and the order will hold up on appeal.
Your Tax Dollars “at Work for You”. Not!
Welcome to Weavergate.
I am not an attorney. Nothing here should be taken as legal advice.
Because I am not allowed to practice law and there are a few judges and lawyers who would like any excuse to incarcerate me, I usually write about my own cases. I am free to discuss my experiences and how I responded in certain situations but must tip toe lightly around other people’s cases.
If you have followed my blog, you have read about two of my cases, Pietrczak and PRA.
The two cases collided, like particles in the Big Bang.
Pietrczak is about a man who conned me into believing he was in love with me in order to defraud me of hundreds of thousands of dollars. After making off like a bandit, he filed a lawsuit against me in an attempt to take many times the initial fraud. A lawyer named William White helped him to win the lawsuit by default against a trust that I am a trustee of, even though the joint claims against me were dismissed on the merits. It appeared to me and many attorneys I asked to represent the trust that the judge on the case is colluding with Pietrczak and White. No lawyer would represent the trust out of self-preservation.
One appearance of bias is that the judge, Susan Weaver, insists that she made an erroneous ruling orally, and that I took more than the allotted 10 days plus weekends to object, so the order became a written order with no opportunity to respond in writing.
I was representing myself in the hearing and know what was said. Judge Weaver said that she spoke to the “AOC” during a short break and they told her Pietrczak’s oral motion for an extension of time to serve summons on the trust had to be in writing and I had to be given an opportunity to respond in writing.
The official court reporter’s transcript followed the fiction created by Judge Weaver and Attorney White.
I guess the conspirators thought that I would be scared of disputing Judge Weaver’s lies, like so many of the lawyers in this neck of the woods and let her transfer property that should belong to me to her friends and family.
Judge Weaver does scare me. But I am a champion poker player. There is a fun saying in poker. “A big pair beats everything.” Regardless of the spoken threat that Judge Weaver will incarcerate me and give all the money I ever earn or inherit to Pietrczak and White, I called her “bluff”. She gets away with a lot of stuff, but I don’t think she will get away this time.
So far, I have limited the amount of impermissible transfer to the value of a 40-acre parcel with a cabin, because that is the only assets that ever got put into the trust.
The PRA case is about a debt buyer that made incessant phone calls to me in an attempt to collect an alleged debt. At first, I thought I had no debt. Not to Portfolio Recovery Associates and not to anyone.
Recently, PRA produced what it claims is a statement from the credit card company that shows a debt incurred in 2010. What a coincidence! 2010 is when Pietrczak started his con on me. It is feasible that Pietrczak committed identity theft by using my credit card. Since I was not using the card, having gone to debit cards and cash, I would not look out for a bill. If a bill was sent to an address that we lived at, it could easily by intercepted by Pietrczak.
I think any juror who hears the recordings of the Pietrczak hearings and sees how inaccurate the transcript is will believe that Pietrczak had special favor from the Court. Collusion with the court coupled with Pietrczak’s criminal record, handwritten notes and sworn testimony in which he contradicts himself, is evidence of the plausibility that Pietrczak used one or more of my old credit cards. (All the while, I paid off thousands of dollars of debt for Pietrczak willingly, on the promise that he would reimburse me when he could.)
I want to play the recordings of the Pietrczak hearings to the jurors in the Portfolio Recovery Associates case. I doubt the court reporter will transcribe the dialogue when Mr. White leaned toward me and said “bitch” loud enough for me and the court observers to hear. The written transcript, even if accurate, cannot capture Judge Weaver’s tone of voice, snarky to me and sweet to Mr. White and Mr. Pietrczak.
I had a subpoena served on the court reporter.
Below is her brief in support of a motion to quash the subpoena. It is written on her behalf by the Office of Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge. It seems to me to be in violation of Civil Rules of Procedure Rule 1, Rule 11 and is a big waste of taxpayer dollars.
If the deputy attorney general actually made a reasonable inquiry into the facts of the case, he would encourage his “client” to email the files of the recordings. The AG would learn from the fiasco surrounding the oval office tapes that Nixon tried to keep from the public.
I won’t vote for Leslie Rutledge for Lt. Governor. She says what I want to hear, but in practice she defends government employees with facts and law that she knows or should know are not true. She may eventually file charges against Judge Weaver and court reporter Jana Perry for some kind of honest services fraud*, but to date, I have no reason to think Attorney General Rutledge pursues law and order when it comes to her cronies and the entrenched power elite.
*Assistant Attorney General Middlebrooks provided me with this information: “While the Attorney General does represent the state in criminal cases on appeal, it does not, to the best of my knowledge, do any prosecution at the trial level.”
I have contacted the FBI, Searcy County Sheriff, the Court Reporters Board and filed a civil rights action that was supposed to be read by Federal District Judge Wilson and the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals. I have yet to have anyone act even mildly interested in investigating what I believe is a serious infraction of the law.
By creating inaccurate records, the court personnel involved are making law obsolete in Arkansas. Worse, each and every citizen is subject to the whims of a greedy judge. Please do not vote for Susan Weaver for any office in Arkansas. She belongs in prison, not public office.
Do You Question the Integrity of Judge Susan Weaver of Arkansas Circuit Courts?
Do you find yourself thinking “Judge Weaver favored the other party”?
“Judge Weaver would not let me present evidence”?
“Judge Susan Weaver had a bias”?
Do you ask “is there anything I can do to help remove Judge Weaver from the bench?” Or, “is there some way to have criminal charges filed against Judge Weaver?”
One thing you will need is persistence. Patience is important, too.
An investigation by the Judicial Disciplinary and Disability Commission, called the JDDC, can take up to 18 months. You can file a complaint here.
The JDDC and law enforcement told me that they cannot overturn any of the judge’s rulings. I helped convince the California equivalent of the JDDC to discipline another evil “judge”, Alan H. Friedenthal. But, despite his appearance of bias and embroilment in my case (and several others) his destructive and draconian rulings were never overturned.
But I tried to appeal the orders all the way to the United States Supreme Court and then to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.
Even though none of the higher courts gave me any relief, I am glad I plodded through. The California Commissioner Alan Friedenthal eventually recused from my case and then retired from his cushy job.
I am glad I made several complaints to several agencies about corrupt judges, and suggest you do the same.
Call the FBI and ask for the Public Integrity Unit.
Visit the local Sheriff.
Write on bulletin boards and social media.
If you contact me at bohemian_books@yahoo.com I will research your case and write about it on this blog. I will give you the level of confidentiality that you request.
Or you can write your own story and I will consider posting it here.
The courts belong to the People. Fight those that would try to transfer wealth and even traffic children for their own gain and sick motives.
Get loud.
The King’s New Clothes: Judge Weaver Tries to Silence Me from Pointing Out Her Deceptions
It is illegal to practice law without a license. Does that make writing that statement an illegal act?
I think not. Otherwise, we would need to round-up and incarcerate every parent who tells their child, “it is illegal to use marijuana without obtaining a medical marijuana card in Arkansas.” It would be illegal for that back seat driver to say “the speed limit here is only 35 miles per hour. Slow down.”
If laypeople are not allowed to discuss law, a non-attorney might be able to opine that Kyle Rittenhouse shot and killed two men, but the non-attorney would not be allowed to talk about whether it was legal for the young man to possess a gun in the first place or if the shooting was murder.
What if there are two co-defendants in a case, and one of the defendants claims innocence and mentions that the other defendant is equally innocent?
This is what is happening in a civil case that was filed against me.
I successfully proved my innocence. The case against me was dismissed with prejudice, which means on the merits.
The other defendant was a trust of which I am trustee and the beneficiary. Non-attorneys cannot represent trusts, even if they are trustee and beneficiary, or so say most attorneys.
After I was dismissed, Judge Weaver wrote an order in which she “found” that I did all the things the plaintiff claimed, including practicing law without a license when I supposedly prepared legal documents for the trust and the plaintiff. She ignored that just days before she wrote that I was dismissed with prejudice.
Based on my newly “found” trespasses, the trust was held liable for all the damages, because, according to Judge Susan Weaver the trust knew or should have known I was not a licensed attorney, and therefore the trust filed “unauthentic and fraudulent” documents.
Judge Weaver does not want me to say the plaintiff directed the preparation of the documents. She does not want me to say the plaintiff committed fraud against me to the tune of $260,000. The judge does not want me to say that the plaintiff wrote a letter in his own hand, signed, that describes his intent to trick me into giving him over $80,000 more to settle any debt the trust agreed to pay to him, knowing he would use the money to sue me and the trust for 6 or 7 times that amount.
Judge Weaver said making those statements in court would be the unauthorized practice of law.
I think Judge Weaver is pretending she is an imbecile, writing orders that rip off the trust (which is money that should go to me), knowing that no attorney will dare to defend the trust against Judge Weaver’s evil.
Judge Weaver was eager to make arguments for the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff was represented by an attorney. Then, she ignored the truth that supported dismissal of the unrepresented trust. She gave the represented plaintiff everything he asked for…literally.
Property in Arkansas is cheap compared to most states. But be warned, if you bring your money into Arkansas, Judge Weaver and her ilk will probably find a way to take all your assets with bullshit lawsuits filed by her pet attorneys.
Why do Judges do Favors for Friendlies?
HUGE CORRECTION, April 22, 2022
When someone makes an error, she should acknowledge it and correct herself.
I made a huge error when I wrote the following post.
The Arkansas Constitution says what I wrote, but apparently the Constitution does not limit the pay for circuit court judges.
A site called transparency.Arkansas.gov lists Judge Susan K. Weaver’s pay as $180,129.
So, my question is answered. Even paying a judge a wage that is higher than the majority of hard-working folks does not guarantee the judge will be honest.
Here is a link to the site and here is the original article.
**************************************************
I never thought I would be arguing to pay a government employee more…especially not a judge. But my problem with judges is only when a judge acts corruptly, like Judge Susan Weaver appears to me.
I wondered why a judge would be greedy enough to jeopardize her career and even risk prison for helping her favored attorneys. I just found out one reason.
The Arkansas Constitution Amendment 15 specifies the monthly salary “for Judge of the Circuit Courts and Chancellors, each, the sum of $3,600.00.”
That is a livable wage, but most attorneys in Arkansas charge about $300 per hour. That means a judge, who is an attorney first, would need to work only 12 hours per month as an attorney to earn the same salary as she would earn honestly as a judge. Add another couple hours to cover the medical insurance and other benefits.
There would be a lot of temptation and easy rationalization for a judge in Arkansas to take bribes. She might not call it a bribe. She might call it a dinner out, a gift, a campaign contribution or a screaming good deal on something.
When I was a building inspector, which is a position of power similar to a judge, my husband at the time told me to never take anything from the contractors or superintendents. He said taking a gift was the same as taking money out of their pocket.
Once I was offered a gift. It sounded exceptional. I tried to get my ex on the phone to see if he wanted me to take it. He didn’t pick up the call, so I declined the gift.
When I told my now ex about it after work, he blew a fuse. He remembered telling me not to take gifts, but he had to alter that opinion. He said “the rule does not apply if, as here, the gift offered is a pair of tickets to the final game of the World Series!”
Probably government employees who are paid more but are of irreputable character still take the bribes. But it must be difficult to entice the higher quality people to take the cut in pay, to become a judge rather than a lawyer.
My first suggestion is to cut the pay of all attorneys. Their jobs are not so difficult or dangerous as to deserve 10 times the pay of a blue-collar worker or 20 times the pay of an entry level employee.
Realistically, we should raise the pay of judges. And then be quick to fire and incarcerate the judges who take a little something on the side.
There is nothing sweeter than finding a judge who does the right thing, treats people respectfully and gives more than he or she takes. I’ve met a handful. If I learned that any one of them earned $250,000 per year, I’d have no problem with that.
I heard that the investigation of one judicial officer who I helped remove from the bench cost taxpayers $1,000,000. That price tag does not take into account the countless hours of time volunteered by concerned citizens like myself.
A judge like Weaver can financially devastate a “person” by purposefully making bad calls, and often times does. She recently transferred title to a 40-acre property with house from a trust that could not retain representation to a person who admitted in writing that he was trying to defraud the trustee and beneficiary of the trust. The trustee was dismissed as an individual on the merits. The trust held no other assets, but Judge Weaver gave the fraudster plaintiff a blank check for attorney fees, repairs to the structure, personal property that was not placed in the trust and even a box truck which title was given to the individual, not the trust. The trust was devastated.
What do you think? Do we get what we pay for, or would the bad apples always supplement their income by throwing the game in favor of those that gave some form of illegal or unethical compensation?
Judge Susan Weaver Transfers Trust Property from Unrepresented Trust, Again
She did this before in the Gawenis case.
This is not legal advice. I am not an attorney. I am the victim of a corrupt judge.
Judge Weaver allowed a convicted felon to commit perjury in front of her, knowing the convicted felon had obtained property from me by fraud. She made threatening comments to me that if I tried to give testimony contradicting the fraudster, I would be committing a crime, the unauthorized practice of law.
Based on only the fraudster’s testimony and the testimony and arguments made by his attorney, William Zac White, Judge Weaver transferred title from a trust to which I was a beneficiary to the fraudster and then to a special needs trust for the fraudster.
This is the order Judge Weaver wrote, with my commentary bold and underlined. (You can download the court copy below.)
In general, I suggest that you do not buy real estate in Arkansas or bring any assets to the state. The judiciary is inbred and hell-bent on transferring “outsiders” wealth to themselves and their attorney supporters. The “good” attorneys are not willing to take cases where they know the judge has a predetermined outcome, for fear of losing all their cases. More than one attorney told me this.
If there is one brave attorney in Arkansas, I hope he or she takes this matter on contingency.
************************************************
This matter came before the Court on March 17, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. within the Searcy
County Circuit Courthouse located in Marshall, Arkansas. Micheal Pietrczak (hereafter referred
to as “Pietrczak”) appeared in person with his attorney, William Z. White. Laura Lynn Hammett
(hereafter referred to as “Hammett”) appeared in her individual pro-se capacity. The Rural
Revival Trust was not present (though the trustee, Laura Lynn Hammett was present), and no attorney appeared on its behalf. I told Judge Weaver that no attorney would take the case because of her appearance of bias. She said that claim was “unfounded” and went on to hold kangaroo court. Based upon the pleadings filed of record herein, statements of counsel, parties (except that Laura Lynn Hammett as an individual was not permitted to argue, testify or cross-examine the plaintiff), and/or witness(es), and all other matters before the Court, the Court finds as follows:
- This Court granted Pietrczak’s Motion for Default Judgment on March 2, 2022,
against the Rural Reviving Living Trust. The Court found that:
a. Service was perfected, in the presence of the court, upon the Rural Revival
Living Trust on October 7, 2021 after a Motion Hearing in the above case was
held. (The affidavit of summons said that Chief Deputy Sheriff Ezra Pierce served summons on October 12, 2021. But, so far, that misstatement has not been used to support some other lie.)
b. Pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 55(a), when a party against whom a judgment for
affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided
by the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, judgement by default may be
entered. “May” not “should” or “must”. Judge Weaver had already read my counterclaim and the letter written by Pietrczak that explains how he would use money he defrauded from me to pay Willy White to sue me and the trust for six times what I agreed to pay, plus attorney fees.
c. The Rural Revival Living Trust failed to plead or otherwise appear in this
action and therefore defaulted. - The Court ordered that a damages hearing be held on March 17, 2022. The
purpose of the hearing was specifically limited to the Pietrzcak’s presentation of damages
against the Rural Revival Living Trust. How convenient. - During the hearing, Hammett attempted to make objections and statements in
response to Plaintiff’s presentation of statements to the court, admission of exhibits, and/or
witness testimony. The Court, several times, explained to Hammett that she is not a licenses (sic)
attorney and could not make statements or arguments on behalf of the Rural Revival Living
Trust. I told Judge Weaver I wanted to make statements in protection of my own individual rights, and she refused to allow me to speak. Later you will see that she made findings against me as an individual, even after dismissing me on the merits. - Hammett prepared a purported “Marriage Contract” (attached as exhibit 3 to
Pietrczak’s Complaint). The contract was prepared and signed by Pietrczak and Hammett, jointly. On October 14, 2021, based upon Hammett’s announced agreement and
consent the Court found that the contract was void ab initio and deemed to have no legal effect as
if it never existed. There was no hearing on October 14, 2021. There was a hearing on October 7, 2021. At that hearing, I said that the “marriage contract” was not meant to be a legal state endorsed marriage. We specifically wrote “married in the eyes of God”. By the contract, I agreed to split our combined assets 50/50, even though all the assets were rightly mine. But, since Pietrczak wanted to litigate, I would agree to voiding the agreement and recovering all the money Pietrczak defrauded from me, which was hundreds of thousands of dollars more than was used to purchase the Lick Fork property. - Hammett prepared an Affidavit (attached as Exhibit 4 to Pietrczak’s Complaint)
and filed it of record with the Searcy County Clerk on March 13, 2015, at 3:35 p.m. with BK:
MISC 175; PG: 150-151. The Affidavit claims Hammett is entitled to possession of 9985 Lick
Fork Road, Witts Springs, Arkansas (hereafter referred to as “Lick Fork Property”), along with
the owner of title, Micheal Pietrczak. Further, Hammett gives “actual notice to the world that
my possession is as a 50% undivided interest…”. Hammett’s purported claims to the Lick Fork
Property were based upon the purported “Marriage Contract’ discussed in the preceding
paragraph and are therefore deemed to have no legal effect as if it never existed. Judge Weaver refused to let me argue, testify or cross-examine Pietrczak about this issue. The Affidavit I filed was based on what the Court dubbed the “marriage contract”. That contract was only one of many times Pietrczak agreed to split our combined property 50/50 if we broke up. - On or about March 22, 2016, Hammett prepared a Mortgage Agreement (attached
as Exhibit 5 to Pietrczak’s Complaint) on behalf of the Rural Revival Living Trust guarantying
the repayment of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100
($150,000.00) from the Rural Revival Living Trust to Pietrczak. Judge Weaver would not let me speak about this document on March 17, 2022. But she allowed me to speak about it on October 7, 2021. I said and wrote in filed documents that the mortgage was a form found online and Pietrczak told me what to write in the blanks. I was merely the scribe who filled in blanks in a mortgage. - The Mortgage Agreement was filed of record with the Searcy County Clerk on
March 23, 2016, at 11:30 a.m. within Book: MORT 203; PG: 427-436. On March 22, 2016, the
purported Mortgage Agreement was only executed by Hammett, not a licensed attorney, as the
trustee of the Rural Revival Living Trust rendering the Mortgage Agreement invalid. Therefore,
the Mortgage Agreement is void ab initio and deemed to have no legal effect as if it never
existed. I agree. The Mortgage Agreement was void ab initio. So, why is Judge Weaver giving Pietrczak an award based on a void mortgage? (Hint: She wants to.) - On or about March 22, 2016, Hammett prepared a Warranty Deed (attached as
Exhibit 6 to Pietrczak’s Complaint) on behalf of the Rural Revival Living Trust purportedly
transferring the Lick Fork Property from Pietrczak to the Rural Revival Living Trust. Again, Pietrczak told me what to write. My spelling is far superior to his, and I was his secretary often during our six years together. Only Pietrczak signed the deed. There was no space on the form we copied for the transferee to sign. Putting title into a trust was Pietrczak’s demand, and one of his cohorts wrote that I “slipped up” when I agreed to let Pietrczak deed to a trust instead of me as an individual. - The Warranty Deed was filed of record with the Searcy County Clerk on March
23, 2016, at 11:13 a.m. within Book: Deed 200; PG: 606-609. Hammett is not a licensed
attorney. Therefore, the Warranty Deed is void ab initio and deemed to have no legal effect as if
it never existed. Pietrczak is the only person who signed the warranty deed. It was prepared under his direction. Judge Weaver should not call it void ab initio. - The Rural Revival Living Trust knew or should have known that Hammett is not
a licensed attorney and that she is prevented from preparing legal documents on behalf of
Pietrczak and/or the Rural Revival Living Trust. So, Judge Weaver finds that the Rural Revival Living Trust cannot represent itself, because it is not an attorney, but that the Rural Revival Living Trust should know an obscure interpretation of the law that forbids a non-attorney to represent another entity. The interpretation applies the law to the trustee of a trust. Several attorneys I spoke with did not know this interpretation of the law. Pietrczak demanded the property that should have been put in Hammett’s name as an individual be put into a trust. - The Rural Revival Living Trust slandered the title of Pietrczak’s Lick Fork
Property by intentionally acting with malice, express or implied, in making slanderous
statements regarding the title of Pietrczak’s Lick Fork Property. Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-
37-226(a) anyone who suffers loss or damages as a result of conduct the prohibited conduct and
who must bring civil action to remove any cloud from his or her title or interest in the real
property or to clear his or her title or interest in the real property is entitled to three (3) times
actual damages, punitive damages, and costs, including any reasonable attorney’s fees or other
costs of litigation reasonably incurred. See Ark. Code Ann. §5-37-226(c). Payday for Willy White and his helpers. Of course Judge Weaver ignored the email I presented as an exhibit on August 2, 2021 that said I was willing to pay off the entire mortgage for the trust, if half the money, which was “a tithe”, went into a special needs trust for Pietrczak. I was not speaking on behalf of the trust, but I am the trustee of the trust, so it is unfair to call the trust “malicious”. - Due to Rural Revival Living Trust’s slandering of Pietrczak’s title, Pietrczak has
been unable to enjoy the Lick Fork Property freely and quietly, and likewise, has been unable to
otherwise sell or lease the Lick Fork Property to others. - The Rural Revival Living Trust filed the unauthentic and fraudulent, Mortgage
Agreement and Warranty Deed into the records of the Searcy County Recorder with Pietrczak standing there, and who signed the documents in front of a notary who remembers Pietrczak was sober and had no gun to his head to cloud Pietrczak’s title to the Lick Fork Property and to adversely affect, impair, or discredit the title of Pietrczak’s interest in the Lick Fork Property. This has prevented Pietrczak from disposing, transferring, or granting any interest of the Lick Fork Property to anyone. - The purported “Marriage Contract”, Affidavit of Laura Lynn, Mortgage
Agreement, and Warranty Deed described further herein are canceled, held null, and void and of
no legal effect as if they had never existed. The affidavit does not mention the trust. The trust did not exist at the time. So, Judge Weaver denied my individual right to present evidence in my favor on March 17, 2022, dismissed me on the merits on March 28, 2022, then found against me as an individual on April 7, 2022. - Any and all clouds on the title of Pietrczak’s Lick Fork Property is removed. Again, Judge Weaver over reaches. She said the hearing of March 17, 2022 was only on the trust issues, and did not let the non-defaulting defendant testify or have a jury. “Any and all” clouds on title includes my personal rights to the property.
- The Court renders judgment in Pietrczak’s favor and grants recovery of the
possession of the Lick Fork Property and grants the recovery of the costs incurred by Pietrczak
for the necessitation of this action as set forth within Ark. Code Ann. §18-60-207, 209. - The Court shall issue a Writ of Possession commanding the officer to whom it is
directed to deliver to Pietrczak or his agent possession of the Lick Fork Property pursuant to Ark.
Code Ann. §18-60-208. - At the conclusion of this matter Pietrczak may petition and be awarded his costs
pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-68-401 including the treble damages provisions of Ark. Code
Ann. § 16-60-102. - The Rural Revival Living Trust entered upon and/or unlawfully detained
Pietrczak’s Lick Fork Property without right or claim to title. See Ark. Code Ann. § 18-60-
303(1). - The Rural Revival Living Trust forcibly entered the premises and caused the
locks of Pietrczak’s residence located on the Lick Fork Property to be changed to prevent
Pietrczak or the attorney-in-fact from gaining access to Pietrczak’s Lick Fork Real Property.
See. Ark. Code Ann. § 18-60-303(2). - This Court shall issue a Writ of Possession pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 18-60-
309. - This Court hereby declares that Pietrczak is the true and rightful owner of the
Lick Fork Property pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 57 and Ark. Code Ann. § 16-111-101 et seq. - This Court permanently enjoins the Rule Reviving Living Trust from further
slandering, clouding, and entering upon Pietrczak’s Lick Fork Property pursuant to Ark. R. Civ.
P. 65. - Pietrczak may be awarded actual monetary damages, upon a proper motion and
hearing, against the Rural Revival Living Trust for the costs of replacing and repairing the
property to its former condition, when Pietrczak last possessed it, once he has been allowed to
inventory, apprise the damages, and file a verified damages report with this Court. - Michael Pietrczak is the true and rightful owner of the property located in Searcy,
County, Arkansas that has been the subject of this matter and who’s legal description is as
follows: - The cloud on the title of Pietrczak’s Lick Fork Property is removed and is not
subject to any lien, mortgage, other encumbrances. Judge Weaver is not allowed to remove liens and other encumbrances that belong to me as an individual without a case filed, summons served and any further action against me would be res judicata because I was already dismissed with prejudice. - The Court Orders title to the Lick Fork Property be placed into the Micheal A.
Pietrczak Special Needs Trust as previously considered and ruled upon by the Court. If
necessary, the Court will issue the appropriate conveyance documents (if necessary) to effectuate
the transfer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HONORABLE SUSAN WEAVER
Judge Weaver stamped the order but did not date it. It was filed on April 7, 2022
Only a licensed attorney can represent a trust. But we each have the right to express ourselves regarding the decisions judges and juries make. Do you think OJ was guilty? Do you think Kyle Rittenhouse was innocent? The whole country expresses its opinions on legal issues, even though some of the people are not licensed attorneys.
Do you think Judge Weaver conspired with William Zac White to transfer property from a trust to a man who committed fraud on the beneficiary of that trust? If you do, please contact the JDDC and let them know you lost trust in the integrity of our legal system. If you are an attorney and want to represent the trust on appeal, contact me at bohemian_books@yahoo.com. You can take the maximum contingency fee allowed from the trust case and any case you advocate on my individual behalf for malicious prosecution and fraud against any of the actors.
Judge Susan Weaver of Arkansas Gives Oral Order for Huge Payout to Fraudster
When I was 47, I hooked up with a broke 38-year-old who was freshly released from prison where he had served a year for using a fake identification at the US – Mexico border while driving a stolen vehicle.
He was a good-looking younger man. But I honestly fell in love with him based on his words and his actions. He acted like a Boy Scout. I had an inkling that the story he was telling me about his past was not true. And it wasn’t.
My instincts were right, but I erred in the wrong direction. I thought Micheal Pietrczak might have worked undercover and was in prison to infiltrate the criminal population. Really, he was a fraudster, living the cliche of convincing an older Christian woman that he was equally “in love”.
Unfortunately, Pietrczak was a raging alcoholic, in recovery when we met. He lost his sobriety after a couple years together. Then he made my life miserable.
My faith led me to stay with the alcoholic for about four more years, doing all in my power to support his recovery.
Finally, when Pietrczak was openly engaging in sex with prostitutes, using my money, I left him.
I was willing to give him half the assets we accumulated, using hundreds of thousands of dollars of my money and both our labor. I was even willing to give him $75,000 extra if it went into a trust that was not controlled by his father.
Here are two emails I sent to Micheal Pietrczak’s first attorney, Billy Jack Gibson, who is now a judge.
That was not enough for Mike Pietrczak, his father Walter and their attorney William White of Heber Springs. They conspired to accept my payments under the pretense that Pietrczak was grateful, all the while knowing they were going to sue me for three times the amount. Here is one signed letter planning the fraud.
I wrote a counterclaim to the lawsuit William Z. White filed but did not serve on me. (I found the complaint on my own, while doing other research.)
Judge Weaver dismissed my counterclaim. There was no motion to dismiss. In fact, there was no answer at all to the counterclaim. I had filed for default judgment, which Judge Weaver denied. Instead, she gave a general reason, that she noticed the counterclaim did not comply with Rule 8, and dismissed it.
The conspirators named “Rural Revival Living Trust” as a defendant as well. I am trustee of the trust.
Trusts must be represented by attorneys. So far, I have not found an attorney brave enough to go up against Judge Weaver, who appears to have a bias against me. (The trust was going to pay $300 per hour to its attorney, but now is willing to hire an attorney on contingency only.)
Even though Judge Weaver saw the same evidence posted above, she held a kangaroo court on March 17, 2022, in which she forbid me from advocating for my own interests, presenting more evidence of the Pietrczak fraud, or object to things like Mr. White leading the witness. I was forced to watch Judge Weaver, Mr. White, and Mr. Pietrczak lie about me, Laura Lynn Hammett, without rebutting a word.
This judge, the same woman who dismissed my counterclaim sua sponte, meaning on her own without notice, did not put the trustee of the trust on the witness stand and try to reach the truth of the matter. Though she did ask the plaintiff questions, such as how much the property worth is, without challenging his answers.
Judge Weaver gave a convicted felon carte blanche to take all the assets in the trust, which was title to a 40-acre parcel and cabin. The conspirators claimed the value of the property was about $150,000 in court. Mr. White wrote an email two days later saying the bidding on the property will start at $350,000.
A written order has not been signed yet.
Attorney William White wrote a proposed order in which the Court “finds” that Laura Lynn Hammett committed the unauthorized practice of law. That is a crime, and Judge Weaver specifically said she was not charging me with the crime during the March hearing. I certainly was not given an opportunity to defend against the false claim.
Mr. White also wrote that the “Rural Revival Living Trust knew or should have known that Hammett is not a licensed attorney and that she is prevented from preparing legal documents on behalf of Pietrczak and/or the Rural Revival Living Trust.”
So, White claims that I could not represent the trust on legal issues but should have known and made a legal decision for the trust that it was illegal to represent the trust on legal issues.
As an afterthought, the fraudsters asked the judge to approve a trust be formed for Michael Pietrczak’s benefit, and to transfer the assets he defrauded from me as an individual into the new trust. This looks to me like, if Judge Susan Weaver puts her stamp of approval on the proposed order, I will become the victim of a fraudulent transfer that is ordered by a judge who knows the transfer is fraudulent.
Is this what We the People want for the State of Arkansas, a “Red State”, a predominantly Christian state? That we have judges who proclaim “Praise Jesus” in public posts, then transfer old ladies’ trust property by default to an admitted fraudster?
A Higher Law 