General Counsel for UAMS Exposed
Public servants are supposed to serve the public.
Instead, the attorneys for University of Arkansas’s teaching hospital condone the cover-up of the false imprisonment and battery of a man who fell off the ten-foot-high rung of a ladder. (The victim is my son.)
At best, the doctors and nurses at UAMS made a bone head mistake. My favorite saying these days, “they aren’t brain surgeons.”
Someone at MEMS, the EMTs who brought the injured man into the Emergency Department, wrote that the chief complaint was “fall from approximately 35 ft from ladder”. The EMT gave no attribution. There were no known witnesses. It would have been correct to write “fall from approximately 35 ft ladder”. He added an extra “from”.
The only criteria that suggested this injury deserved trauma activation was “fall > 20 ft.”
Ignoring the physical evidence they were staring at, UAMS decided to adopt the narrative of a 35-foot fall with the injured man having vitals better than most men his age on a good day. They started shooting him up with Fentanyl, Lorazepam, Diazepam, Haldol…. binding him to the $4,700 per day hospital bed.
Which brings us to the worst-case scenario. The doctors who are paid as much as $560,000 per year salary wanted to drum up business. They said my son would probably not qualify for Medicaid. Another illogical statement, since Medicaid is income based, and they were claiming the TBI patient would need months of intensive care followed by inpatient rehab. It was likely, according to them, that he wouldn’t be working any time soon.
Self-pays are charged about 2.5 times what UAMS has negotiated to pay Medicaid.
He looked like a lucrative mark.
Well, our claim to the Arkansas Claims Commission is heating up. Here are a couple documents I filed today. If you are an attorney licensed in Arkansas who would like to represent Mr. Lynn in a case against the insured individuals involved, shoot me an email. bohemian_books@yahoo.com.
If you want to dig deeper, here is a copy of the full medical report. It has a lot of inaccuracies. But you can check the pages I reference, to make the unbelievable believable.
Sunday Funday. What I wish I could tell the court.
ChatGPT and that woman wearing a white business suit and a halo who sits on my right shoulder will try to talk me into taming my sarcasm. I’m rooting for the lady in the red, tight-fitting gown who sits on my left shoulder. The questionable tone is in my motion for spoliation sanctions against UAMS for “writing over” videos of the doctors and nurses who allegedly falsely imprisoned, drugged, battered and raped my son, repeatedly over a two-week span. Then charged him $46,000 after letting him leave in far worse condition than when he was brought in.
Imagine a video of a man who allegedly needed intensive care running down the hallway carrying a full grocery bag of his belongings in each arm, breaking loose of grasping hands of the gang following him, both men and women, all dressed in scrubs, and he outran them to the elevator. A bunch of them, including the man they claim to want to save from having a deadly seizure, get into the closest elevator to H4. A skirmish ensues. The patient’s 60-year-old mother, who was sitting in the waiting area as ordered, sees the chase and moves toward the elevators. The patient yells, “I just want to give these things to my mom.” He is allowed to hand the bags off to his mother. Then he jumps across the aisle to the second elevator, kitty corner to the one closest to ICU. He moves to press a button with his left hand and someone shoves him, causing the left side of his head to hit the wall. This subdues him and the group of healthcare workers is able to bring him back to confinement. This imagery should bring to mind a man who does not consent to treatment and who is amazingly fit, despite this being the second week of his imprisonment, starvation and poisoning after falling on his head from the 10-foot rung of a ladder and being denied uninterrupted sleep or proper hydration. But UAMS destroyed the video. They claim now that they had no indication that there might be criminal or civil misconduct alleged. Nope, they say, this is a routine event. Shred away.
SPOILER ALERT: The patient did not die after we left UAMS against unsolicited advice. 18 months later and he is enroute home from an African Photo Safari. He hopes to find an attorney who will represent him against UAMS and a list of doctors and nurses including Dr. Mary Kimbrough, Dr. Jordan Greer, Dr. Joseph Deloach, Dr. Elizabeth Brown, Nurse Shannon Cobb and a host of others.
Send emails of interest to bohemian_books@yahoo.com. You can watch videos that we took against the intimidations of the alleged criminals on Youtube.
Escape vs. Elope: UAMS General Counsel Associate Sherri Robinson weighs in.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NUMBER 12: Admit that [Patient] Lynn tried to escape from UAMS.
UAMS’ ANSWER: Denied. Patient Lynn attempted to elope which is the act of a patient leaving a healthcare facility without authorization or notification when there are safety concerns for the patient based on the patient’s medical condition, which in this case, included cognitive impairment resulting from a traumatic brain injury.
In their answer, UAMS did not simply deny the request. Instead, they reframed it by substituting the word escape with the term elope, and then inserted a definition—uncited and not drawn from any legal authority. This language appears designed to justify their actions rather than respond in good faith to the request.
Medical staff at UAMS referenced at least 20 separate instances of Lynn’s attempts to leave the facility using variations of the term elope. It is worth noting that “elopement” in this context is a term adopted by the medical industry. It is not a legal classification of behavior, nor does it override a person’s constitutional rights.
UAMS’s response implies that Mr. Lynn required authorization to leave the hospital. This implication is both misleading and dangerous. There is no law requiring a mentally competent adult to obtain permission to leave a hospital. The term Against Medical Advice (AMA) was coined by the healthcare industry to describe patients who decline care—not to denote unlawful behavior. Leaving a hospital AMA is not unauthorized. UAMS knows this. Its own published Patient Rights and Responsibilities—which must comply with the Fourteenth Amendment—acknowledge the patient’s right to refuse treatment and leave the facility.
UAMS justified the use of physical and chemical restraints by citing cognitive impairment. What Mr. Lynn actually experienced was mild aphasia—resulting from swelling in the language center of his brain. Aphasia is a recognized disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It affects communication, not judgment, and does not make a person a danger to themselves or others. There was no injury to Mr. Lynn’s frontal cortex, the part of the brain that governs decision-making.
Despite this, UAMS forcibly detained him using both physical restraints and sedating medications. They did so without proper notification to his family or household members. His mother—listed in his phone as “Mom and Grandma”—was not contacted, even though she and others arrived at the hospital shortly after learning of his injury. UAMS refused to recognize her as a surrogate decision-maker. It was not until day 14 that UAMS admitted, in writing, that they had no reason to consider her incapacitated.
For two weeks, UAMS misrepresented the cause of Mr. Lynn’s condition. Now, rather than acknowledge their errors, they appear to be doubling down. The agitation they blame on a brain injury was more plausibly caused by a combination of factors: overmedication, being physically tackled, restrained naked to a hospital bed, trauma to his genitals, and—based on descriptions in the medical record and first hand observation by this writer—what could be legally characterized as sexual assault.
After Mr. Lynn was discharged Against Medical Advice, the hospital was asked to prescribe the medications they had used to stabilize him. Of the many powerful drugs administered to him without his consent, only two—propranolol and sodium tablets—were prescribed for use at home.
The following medications were administered involuntarily while Mr. Lynn was held at UAMS, and the doctors knew he would not need these if Lynn was allowed to return home:
- Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone
- Dexmedetomidine
- Diazepam
- Divalproex
- Enoxaparin
- Fentanyl
- Guanfacine
- Haloperidol Lactate
- Levetiracetam
- Magnesium Sulfate
- Olanzapine
- Ondansetron
- Phenobarbital
- Polyethylene Glycol
- Propranolol
- Quetiapine
- Senna
- Trazodone
These drugs span multiple classes: sedatives, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and opioids. Administering them to a restrained patient who is attempting to assert their right to leave—without informed consent and with no legal authorization for involuntary hold—raises serious questions about abuse, medical ethics, and civil liberties.
A Higher Law 