Missing y’all.

My appellate deadline to file a brief challenging the majority of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky’s orders on my case against a PRA Group subsidiary was extended to November 27th. Using the extra time to edit and edit again makes the difference between filing a good brief and a make-them-want-to-cry-and-suck-their-collective-thumb brief.

Here is another sneak peek. It is my required a one-page summary of the 287-docket entries in the case.

Summary of the Case and Willingness to Participate in Oral Argument

     PRA and the Court do not want the public to hear the facts of this case.

     PRA intended to extort payment of a debt I did not owe by annoying and harassing me with incessant, disturbing phone calls.

     PRA’s intrusion upon my seclusion was outrageous. Adverse verdicts and settlements against PRA total over $130,000,000. PRA’s spoliation and secreting of evidence shows the company knew its calling pattern was unacceptable.

     I sent possibly thousands of calls to voicemail, blocked calls, begged these strangers to stop calling and finally acquiesced to answering questions on a recorded line. The only way to stop PRA was to pay an invalid debt or file a lawsuit. I filed a lawsuit. With no offer, stated waiver or cancellation, PRA agreed the balance was zero. 8.5 months later, PRA swore the correction was a “waiver”.  

     PRA continued to harass me throughout the proceedings, using the same illegal and unethical litigation tactics that my therapists documented as PTSD stressors. The Court upheld PRA’s subpoenas of my utterly irrelevant sexual history.

    The Court denied me equal protection, misstated evidence, misquoted me, denied my discovery motions and allowed PRA to spoil evidence. The Court granted summary judgment based on negative inferences against me, the non-moving party, and ordered me to pay PRA four times the fraudulent Debt in costs.

     If it pleases this Court, I will attend oral argument for rebuttal and questions.