Who is annoying and harassing? Pro se litigants or lawyers?
Read the pro se plaintiff’s responses to interrogatories and requests for production, and you be the judge.
This is how our tax dollars are spent in Arkansas
General Counsel for UAMS and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas, Sherri Robinson, is paid over $160,000 per year.
Over 70 employees were involved in holding a man against his will for two weeks, drugging him with Fentanyl, benzos, and a slew of unwanted drugs, and tying him to a bed, naked, for days at a time. It was a big mistake, and they finally let him leave, after two weeks, in drastically worse condition than he entered.
A lawsuit was filed against only UAMS at the Arkansas Claims Commission. Denying all fault, UAMS, through Ms. Robinson, asked that a different suit be filed against all defendants who might have insurance.
That suit was filed.
Over two years have passed since the alleged false imprisonment and battery. Tons of paperwork, or should I say terabytes of data has been generated. And still, neither the University of Arkansas nor any of the UAMS medical providers have apologized and no settlement offer has been extended.
Instead, there are two more law firms involved, and the defendants’ plan seems to be to win by overwhelming the victim and his 63-year-old mother with unprofessional lawyering. Here is a motion for an unconstitutional “protective order” – AKA gag order – filed by Sherri Robinson, the plaintiffs’ response and a reply.
Look at the reply. There is not a single cited authority. Now listen to it. Do you hear Sherri’s shrill whine?
University of Arkansas Calls This Blog “Harassing”: Asks court for protection
UALR is making a bid to be able to designate all evidence in a medical battery case against its staff as “confidential.”
Here is our response, exhibits, and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas’s motion and brief.
What we forgot to say to the court is that UAMS wants to keep its staff’s addresses confidential but claims it was perfectly fine to hold a man against his will, and though he had no injury to his torso or appendages, to tie him to a cot with his genitals exposed.
If you can help protect our liberties and open access to court records, please contact me at bohemian_books@yahoo.com. I am finishing my first year of law school and would love to have an attorney’s guidance to work on this case during summer break.
Friday Funday: ABC guide to Lawyering (Life Is A Freeroll Series Book 26)
My son Sean is creative and amusing. He even thought of taking our dry, repetitive court documents and some of my blog posts, and turning them into an entertaining (yet educational) narrative.
This is his first book of purely non-fiction.
Enjoy!
Prestigious Law Firm Tries to Use Old Trick On New Dogs
The folks at Wright, Lindsey, and Jennings LLP were told at least once in the past that requests for admission that address purely legal issues are impermissible.
Hey, if the pro se litigant failed to file his responses in a timely manner, maybe a different judge would make an error and deem the legal conclusion admitted. That’s the old college try.
Friday Fun: In Honor of Buddy Lynn
My beloved son Buddy was a little left of Karl Marx. Paradoxically, he distrusted government.
Well, my love, this one’s for you:
A Higher Law 