A Strand-by-Strand Unraveling of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky’s Web of Lies and Deceit – Chapter Five

Let’s reiterate a thin little line we looked at in Chapter Four. It is a line that holds together the entire web spun by Judge Rudofsky to trap the Court of Appeals into agreeing with his deceit.

“The load data that Capital One provided to PRA, LLC”. (Hammett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Docket No. 173, at page 3)

The Trump nominated judge referred to an exhibit that he allowed PRA to mark “CONFIDENTIAL” and file “UNDER SEAL”. (id., Footnote 19, “Ex. C (Load Data Sheet) to Ex. 1 to Def.’s Statement of Facts (Doc. 78-6) (Under Seal at Doc. 121).”

Judge Rudofsky then stated what he purports to be written in the “under seal” document. He lied.

There is nothing on the document that suggests it was generated by Capital One. It is not a unique document. There are documents in other cases involving PRA that are almost identical, the only difference being the data loaded. Where “Capital One” was entered in this case, different credit card company names were entered in the other cases.

But, there is something more telling that the Data Load was a creation of Portfolio Recovery and not of Capital One.

Judge Rudofsky acknowledged that Hammett lived at the address on the “Data Load”, “5757 Erlanger for two nights”. (Doc 173, Footnote 21, “Ex. C (Load Data Sheet) to Ex. 1 to Def.’s Statement of Facts (Doc. 78-6) (Under Seal at Doc. 121); see also Hammett Dep. Vol. I (Doc. 164) at 78:9–12”.) Once again, notice that the judge told the public what was written on the “Under Seal”, “CONFIDENTIAL” Load Data.

The Hammett deposition is redacted, but not under seal. (If you have some spare time, read the whole thing. If not, please turn to Page 392.)

This is an email chain between the landlord at 5757 Erlinger and me when I was Laura Lynn. After spending two nights at the townhouse, I decided to move out. I was never there, so it was a waste. That was in October 2011.

Hey! Wait! Look back to the Rudofsky order granting summary judgment to the billionaire debt buyer, at page 2. The judge, not very good at keeping secrets, said that the charge off date on the super-secret docs was April 8, 2011.

Now, I didn’t go to Cornell and Harvard, like the judge, but, I’m pretty sure that October 2011 is after April 2011. It doesn’t make sense to me that Capital One would charge off a debt, then six months later, run a skip trace on the debtor, find an address where she lived for two nights that was not her residency for legal purposes, and never update the skip trace again, before supposedly selling the debt to PRA in 2013.

This web is looking so flimsy to me. I am beginning to think it was spun by a whole group of spiders and the data is not the only thing that was loaded.