Judge Susan Weaver Claims Expressing Intent to Appeal is a Criminal Threat on the Judge
This is unbelievable. But true. I’ve heard recordings that clearly substantiate the claims of pro se litigant and fellow Judge Weaver victim, Betty Figueroa.
Betty was terrorized. She says she was going to participate in a luncheon event given by the Arkansas Bar Association on Friday. Judge Weaver was slated to speak there.
According to the pro se litigant, Judge Weaver conveyed a message through the police department, that if Betty Figueroa attends the shindig, she will be arrested. Her alleged crime. Threatening the judge.
I heard a recording of Betty speaking to Judge Weaver’s clerk, Emma.
Betty: “She [Judge Susan Weaver] filed a report on me.”
Emma: “…the last few times I’ve talked to you you’ve said that if [Judge Weaver] doesn’t file a response [to a petition for writ of mandate Betty Figueroa filed in the circuit court] you’re going to take it to the Supreme Court, and that is a threat.”
Really? Inquiring if the petition for writ of mandamus to compel Judge Weaver to do her job at the circuit court needs to be filed in a higher court, or if Judge Weaver intends to agree to the requested conduct on her own is considered a “threat”? A threat worthy of arresting Mrs. Figueroa for, but only if she participates in a Bar Association event?
Yes, later in the conversation, Emma repeated quite clearly: “You threatening to file stuff against Judge Weaver is a threat.”
The ones who seem to be making criminal threats are Judge Susan Weaver and her goon patrol.
It gets more frustrating!
Mrs. Figueroa claims she reported the judge’s threats to the JDDC. Someone at the JDDC told her to report it to the prosecutor, according to Mrs. Figueroa. I heard the recording of Betty and the prosecutor’s discussion. The prosecutor told the alleged victim to report the threat to the police; the same police office that conveyed the threat for Judge Weaver.
I went to three different police departments to report Judge Weaver for colluding to fictionalize transcripts of hearings she presided over. I went to Searcy County, Faulkner County and Malvern. Each department refused to investigate. The Malvern officer told me that judges can do whatever they want, even lie in court.
Is there no one in the government who will stand up against this tyranny? Are there no lawyers willing to challenge Judge Weaver on appeal for her unethical and allegedly illegal conduct against pro se litigants?
What about you? What will you do?
Improved Questions for SCOTUS: Pro Se Fights Against the Lack of Transparency in Court
The lead case for this challenge to a common problem is Laura Lynn Hammett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, et al.
Questions presented for review:
- Whether transparency, equal access to technology, and guarding the integrity of evidence in court proceedings is required to protect the due process rights of a class of people who are often denied equal protection because of their socio-economic class; Pro Se Litigants.
- Whether the regulatory opinions resulting from civil investigations by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are authoritative and may be used as evidence of the respondents’ practices.
If court personnel, including clerks and judges, altered the record in a case in which you were an unrepresented litigant, you were denied permission to file electronically, or the judge ignored obvious incongruities in the represented parties’ evidence and you were self-represented, please post your case name, number and jurisdiction in the comments or contact me anonymously at bohemian_books@yahoo.com.
Your case may be included in a collection for an appendix to this petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States and if denied, the Office of the High Commissioner of the United Nations.
A Higher Law 