Arkansas Judge Susan Weaver Exposed – Will SCOTUS Care?

FREE Docs of the Day

There appears to be collusion between Judge Susan Weaver and Heber Springs Attorney William Zac White.

White puts the trust of an elderly person in his sights, and the court pulls the trigger. Bam!

They hit the trust and bag the proceeds to fund their own fun.

In my case, I actually offered to give the money we paid for a house on 40 acres to Mike Pietrczak, $150,000. I put my offer in writing and sent it to the lawyer who represented my ex-partner prior to Willy White taking over. That was Billy Jack Gibson, now a judge in Hot Springs. (And presiding over a criminal case against his former client Pietrczak. Grisham couldn’t make this up.)

The email was filed as an exhibit in the case. But Judge Sue wanted to give him (and his attorney) more.

After years in kangaroo court, Pietrczak and his attorney banked $200K. After vigorous litigation and a “trial”, it is realistic to think the attorney got half. Or half plus costs. Mike got $100,000 or less.

And, if there is any justice, the pair will be cellies in prison. Read Appendix H – Mike’s “suicide” note. It sounds like a plan to commit fraud against me and fraud on the court.

But, if the court knows the plaintiff is a fraudster and gives him the loot anyhow, is it fraud on the court?

Maybe that should be my next Question Presented to SCOTUS.

Tags: , , , , ,

Unknown's avatar

About LauraLynnHammett

Regular people like you and I should have access to justice, even if we can't afford an attorney. Judges must stop their cronyism. Attorneys who use abusive tactics against pro se litigants should be disbarred. This site discusses some of the abuses by our legal professionals. It also gives media attention to cases that are fought and sometimes won by the self represented.

2 responses to “Arkansas Judge Susan Weaver Exposed – Will SCOTUS Care?”

  1. Jason's avatar
    Jason says :

    What Is “Fraud Upon the Court”?

    “Fraud upon the court” is a very serious charge. It doesn’t just mean lying or playing dirty in court — it refers to a deliberate deception that corrupts the judicial process itself.

    According to federal and many state rulings (including Arkansas precedent), it usually involves:

    • Officers of the court (attorneys or judges)
    • Intentional deception or collusion
    • A result that undermines the fairness of the proceeding
    • A party being denied their right to a fair trial

    Black’s Law Dictionary defines it as:

    “A fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, etc., but fraud that seriously affects the integrity of the normal process of adjudication.”

    Based on Your Statement:

    There appear to be multiple red flags:

    • An offer to resolve the dispute fairly was ignored in favor of awarding more money to an opposing party with questionable credibility.
    • The judge allegedly overlooked evidence (e.g., your written settlement offer and possibly the alleged “suicide note”) that would expose fraud or collusion.
    • Connections between attorneys and the judge suggest possible bias or improper influence.
    • The outcome seems to favor a known fraudster and reward a lawyer, possibly in violation of fiduciary responsibility and judicial ethics.

    Yes — This Could Be Argued as Fraud Upon the Court

    If all those elements are provable, especially the court’s knowledge of the fraud and continuing to rule in favor of it, then:

    Yes, it could rise to the level of fraud upon the court.

    And under Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(4) and Federal Rule 60(d)(3), a judgment obtained by fraud upon the court can be vacated at any time — no time limit.Next Steps You Can Consider:

    1. Preserve All Evidence
      Emails, filings, witness statements, recordings, court transcripts, your settlement offer, Mike’s “note,” etc.
    2. Build the Case Logically
      Lay it out: the timeline, connections, ignored evidence, who benefited, and how the legal process was compromised.
    3. Consider a Motion to Vacate or Reopen
      Based on Rule 60 if you’re still within the court’s jurisdiction — especially for fraud on the court.
    4. File a Judicial Complaint
      If Judge Susan Weaver knowingly enabled fraud, a complaint can be filed with the Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission.
    5. Request an Investigation
      The Arkansas Bar Association can also investigate attorney misconduct, especially for William Zac White.

    Like

  2. LauraLynnHammett's avatar
    LauraLynnHammett says :

    Thank you, Jason.

    Your comment was worthy of reposting as a stand-alone article.

    Like

Leave a comment