Exposing Corruption in the Courts
Justice should be blind, but in practice, it too often favors wealth and power. Courtrooms, meant to uphold fairness, have instead become inaccessible battlegrounds where only the elite can afford to fight. The reality? Legal systems designed to protect citizens have been manipulated to serve those who can afford to bend the rules.
This blog is dedicated to uncovering corruption in the judiciary—where excessive legal fees, biased rulings, and unchecked influence shut everyday people out of the justice they deserve.
Our mission is clear:
- Expose misconduct within the court system.
- Demand accountability from judges, lawyers, and officials who abuse their positions.
- Advocate for reform that returns justice to the people.
If you’ve faced legal injustice or have a case that deserves attention, we encourage you to share your story. Together, we can push back against a system that has strayed from its purpose.
UAMS Police police UAMS Doctors?
“Detective” Clifton Moore told me it was illigal to intimidate a police officer by telling him I intended to post my evidence of UAMS doctors committing alleged assault, battery and false imprisonment on the internet. He did not say posting the video of talking with him was intimidation. So, here it is.
Hear ye, hear ye.
Click on the YouTube link and read along with the captions.
Laura: I’m sorry. Hold on. Like I say I was listening to something else and I wanted to do that…so you read the report that I made and you’re saying you can do nothing about it?
Moore: No Ma’am, what I said is it is a civil matter.
L: It is a civil matter but…
M: Yes, Ma’am.
L:You saw the code, you saw the criminal codes that I gave to the officer?
M: Um, I’m familiar with the criminal code.
L: OK? And so why was that not false imprisonment? Why was it not battery? They stuck things up his penis against his will. They gave him benzodiazepines against his will.
M: [Difficult to hear. Probably about permissibility of 72-hour hold.]
L: He was kept for 14 days, that’s a lot longer than 72 hours and they never gave us paperwork for the 72-hour hold. That was one of the videos I was about to send.
M: Ok. I can’t account for the administrative side, um, and what they provided or didn’t provide, so again, that is going to be a civil matter. Certainly you have the right to address it that way, and you can also contact the UAMS risk management or the UAMS office of General Counsel, and discuss, you know, your complaint with them and certainly provide whatever information you have. This is not going to be anything that can be perceived or pursued criminally.
L: Why not?
[jumbled]
L: Why not? They held a man against his will. And they inflicted physical harm on him and they threatened to have him incarcerated and they threatened to have me incarcerated if we left.
M: [@timestamp 2:19] I have no police, uh can find no other police report or documentation. Um, regarding, uh, your son Sean Lynn before today’s date. I don’t have any indications of any problem [inaudible] reported.
L: You, and you’re the police that are in the hospital but you were headed – the, one of the videos, one of the audios says that the nurse saw the police coming and she didn’t want Sean to be triggered so that’s why she called me, so that she could keep the police away. I mean really I thought it was kind of stupid that I was …
[overlap]
M: Honey, I can’t answer for the video or whatever you have, um
L: Ya.
M: Maybe I don’t know what your situation was, maybe they, you know, speculation is that they wanted you to talk to him, uh, so they didn’t have to get the police involved. [@ timestamp 3:25] But, uh, you know, we have frequently officers respond to what we call is patient control, uh, when a patient is behaving in a violent manner toward staff, uh, or could be a danger to themselves or others, patients and visitors, um, then officers could be called to assist. [@ timestamp 3:48] I could find no documentation of where an officer was called or responded to a situation of that such. [inaudible]
L: Because he was never violent. They were the ones being violent.
M: I don’t have any complaint from him.
L: This is his complaint.
M: No Ma’am, this is your complaint.
L: Do you want him to complain?
M: No Ma’am as it doesn’t, it wouldn’t change anything here on this what you reported…
L: He has aphasia and I am an accommodator for his aphasia, it’s easier for me to speak. Plus it was extremely stressful, and he is a TBI patient, so I’m hoping we keep the stress level down for him.
M: Right, right and I understand that, uh, completely. I completely understand your frustration about the whole ordeal and the fact that he had a traumatic brain injury, you know, uh
[overlap of next two]
L: I’m more upset because he was held against his will.
M: [inaudible]
L: What did you say?
M: There are laws in place that prov — that allow medical staff to hold, um, patients against there will, um [inaudible]
L: No. Not. There is not a law allowing them to keep him against his will.
M: There is [inaudible]
L: There is no law allowing them to have done that to him. And the videos that I was, like, about to send to you, show him on the day that they finally let me take him out AMA and it shows him being extremely rational, there is no problem at all that would, and he, at the time he was only on a salt tablets and, uh, a medication to help for headaches. So like, there was no reason for them to keep him other than to drum up business. Which they did charge him forty-six thousand dollars, as I showed you. I was able to get that reversed. And like you say, there is going to be a lawsuit here and apparently it’s going to have to include the police from UAMS because they did not help him. You all had the videos, you had surveillance videos.
M: Ma’am
L: What?
M: This is a civil matter. OK?
L: No. It is a civil matter and it is a criminal matter.
[overlap]
M: [inaudible] OK.
L: OK. My next call’s to the FBI, because you’re not performing your duty and you’re allowing people to be held against their will and so, I’m sorry, what’s your name?
M: My name is Detective Clifton Moore.
L: Detective Clifton Moore. OK.
M: Yes Ma’am.
L: Well, I will, uh, take whatever steps I can, I’m you know I’ll have to – Sean wants to keep this private but I’m going to have to convince him to play the videos on Youtube and, uh, this is a really serious matter.
M: It is against the law to threaten a law enforcement officer [inaudible] pending [inaudible]
L: It, well no I’m not trying to intimidate you. I am telling you, [overlap] [inaudible] Can you please give me the phone, do you have the number for General Counsel?
M: [inaudible]
L: [@ timestamp 8:09] Is that 5-0-1? And what is the number on the police report?
L: OK.
M: [inaudible]
Courts Help Portfolio Recovery Associates: Here is help for You
Portfolio Recovery Associates is not slowing down.
Even as the stock of parent company PRA Group, Inc. plummets, the debt buyer is dialing for dollars.
It took me filing a lawsuit for violation of the FDCPA and intrusion on seclusion for me to convince Portfolio to quit their incessant calling.
It didn’t end well for me. Judge Rudofsky said no reasonable juror could think that the debt collector’s calls were too annoying. PRA got a judgment for over $8,000 to reimburse their costs of defending themselves. Judge Rudofsky said that even though that is more than my annual income, I didn’t list my expenses, so it wasn’t unjust to make me pay the equivalent of a year’s pension to the billion-dollar company. Easy for him to say, living off a six-figure government job.
But, don’t give up. In a different jurisdiction, for similar conduct, PRA was hit with an $82 million jury verdict. Other pro se litigants are making leeway. And Portfolio Recovery did make a $5,000 Offer of Judgment to me – I just went all in and the dealer pulled PRA’s card off the bottom of the deck.
I hope this document showing a Portfolio Recovery Associates call log, charge off data compiled and contact log will help you convince your judge not to let the defendant cover-up similar documents in your case.
Open Response to Email By Someone Interested in Joining a Class Action Against Debt Collectors in New York
Hi. I already filed a lawsuit on my own and lost. Lost on appeal. Was denied discretionary review at the Supreme Court.
I am not an attorney. I scored 162 on the LSAT (Ivy League score) and am accepted tuition free to law school. So, it is over three years before I can help anyone else in court.
I have uploaded many of my filings and filings that won on my website. http://www.court-corruption.com. Also some videos on my YouTube @StopBigBusinessBillionaires
Where did you find me?
The most important advice I can give you in a nutshell, record and document every call. The collector in my case claimed the first hundred calls to my cell phone in 2020 were not made. I hadn’t recorded them and all the numbers I called that were on my phone bill (including the ones they said they called from) they had disconnected.
If a person owed the debts and the statute of limitations expired, the person still owes the money. But the creditor can’t collect in court. They can still call or write to ask the debtor to pay, but are supposed to stop if asked in the same way they contact the person. Regulation F. The calls to me happened before Regulation F went into effect. I was required to put my Cease and Desist in writing. It was a violation for them to try to collect after the C+D. The judge on my case said the interrogatories and affidavit of identity theft or fraud they tried to get me to fill out was not an attempt to collect a debt.
If one of the collectors is Portfolio Recovery Associates, look at the 2015 consent order and the 2023 stipulated judgment for violating that restraint order. Those documents and documents of a winning case with an $82 million jury verdict called Mejia v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC are on my blog and you can download them for free.
If you write your own lawsuit, based on a winning lawsuit or one that was settled as a template, they may throw a little money at you. I had an offer of judgment for $5,000. I think a jury would find damages to be significantly higher, but the judge in Arkansas was not letting it go to trial if I had a video of the debt collector handing him a briefcase full of cash.
Thank you for writing. I almost didn’t open your email because the name of the sender sounded like scam. I’m glad I did open it and hope you find someone who will represent you.
Laura
When the System Rips Children Away from Their Mother: A Voice Still Cries from Ramah
“Thus saith the Lord; A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rahel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, because they were not.”
— Jeremiah 31:15 (KJV)
Thousands of mothers today know this pain all too well. Family court calls it “in the best interest of the child,” but for many, it feels like legal kidnapping — rubber-stamped by judges who never sat at your kitchen table, never saw your bedtime routines, never knew your child’s heart the way you do.
If you’ve lost contact with your child because of a bitter ex or a system that refuses to hear your side, this message is for you.
The world may try to erase you, but you are still their mother.
Watch the short video above and know you are not alone.
Your voice matters. Your story matters. You still matter.
Please share your story in the comments or send a note to bbohemian_books@yahoo.com.
Stop Laughing! There is nothing funny about Judge Rudofsky ordering us to give scam callers our personal info.
This video is a scam caller who called me back to ask what my YouTube channel is called.
He and his partner in crime called earlier to try to trick me into divulging information about myself, such as where I bank and approximately how much money I have in my accounts.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, a debt buyer and collection company owned by PRA Group, Inc., also made calls trying to gain information about me, even after I told them I have no debt and to quit calling me.
Instead of messing with them like I did with this caller, I sued for violations of the FDCPA and invasion of privacy.
PRA got the last laugh (so far) on that one. Trump appointed judge Lee Rudofsky threw my case out on summary judgment, meaning I did not get a jury trial. The Harvard educated judge also ordered me to pay over $8,000 of the scam caller’s costs. He even lied – flat out – that I said I owed the debt.
The Eighth Circuit justices said they agreed completely with Judge Rudofsky, but failed to elaborate at all on the reasons they disagreed with my full-length appellate brief and reply.
By this order and failure to reverse on appeal, the courts are ordering us to answer questions from scammers or expect the scammers to call us again until we comply with their demands for information.
A good question that was not addressed in Hammett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates: If a person lies to a scam caller on a recorded line, can that lie be used against the recipient of the call in a court of law to prove the recipient is somehow less than honest?
Here are the aforementioned briefs and the Eighth Circuit Order affirming Rudofsky’s B.S. summary dismissal.
A Higher Law 