Why Did Judge Billy Roy Wilson Dismiss a case Concerning the Alleged Fictionalization of a Transcript Based on Rooker-Feldman?
The short answer: Judge Billy Roy Wilson is corrupt.
The more perplexing question is “Why did the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirm the dismissal?”
I filed a civil rights action against Judge Susan Kaye Weaver, Court Reporter Jana Perry and Attorney William Zac White. I alleged that the three conspired to make an inaccurate transcript of a hearing in case number 65CV-21-20 in Searcy County Arkansas.
Judge Wilson granted a motion to dismiss filed by Attorney General Leslie Rutledge’s Office on behalf of Judge Weaver and the court reporter before Mr. White even filed a joinder or his own motion. Judge Billy Bob threw in a dismissal for Zac White with no prompting…that the public was made aware of.
One basis Judge Wilson cited for the dismissal was the “Rooker-Feldman” doctrine.
But,
“If a federal plaintiff asserts as a legal wrong an allegedly erroneous decision by a state court, and seeks relief from a state court judgment based on that decision, Rooker–Feldman bars … jurisdiction…. If, on the other hand, a … plaintiff asserts … an allegedly illegal act or omission by an adverse party, Rooker–Feldman does not bar jurisdiction.”
Hageman v. Barton, 817 F.3d 611, 614–15 (8th Cir. 2016)
My complaint specified that I was not asking for review of a state court decision. Though, the bizarre decisions made by Judge S.K. Weaver should certainly be overturned.
It seems to me that collusion between an attorney, a judge and a court reporter to fictionalize the record should be considered an illegal act.
Welcome to Grisham Land.
My suggestion is that if you have any assets, you don’t bring them to Arkansas. A redneck judge at the Federal or State level might decide one of his buddies should be granted your assets and it sucks to be you.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC: Let’s Stop Their Harassing Calls Together
Have you had harassing phone calls from a debt collector that calls themselves Portfolio Recovery Associates or PRA?
Their calls begin “Hi, this is Jane Doe, calling to speak with [the mark’s name].” They do not tell you the company name until you are recorded as having the birthdate or social security number of the alleged debtor they are trying to reach.
Portfolio Recovery Associates is infamous for buying junk debt, pennies on the dollar, then using pit bull tactics to convince their marks to pay the alleged debt.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found that PRA knew many of the lists of debt they purchased were inaccurate, and actually collected on those debts, a high percentage by default judgment.
I filed a pro se lawsuit against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC to try to stop them from harassing others.
PRA is claiming that many of the phone calls I remember receiving were not from them.
Here is a short list of phone numbers the calls came from:
(760) 760-9002
(646) 681-3007
(313) 305-1334
(760) 331-2599
(909) 352-1775
(760) 677-3517
(518) 304-1182
(661)689-5751
(760) 640-3194
(760) 291-4107
(760) 823-3149
(760) 227-1170
(760) 704-0270
(760) 760-9002
If you received a call from any of these numbers or other numbers owned by Portfolio Recovery Associates, please send an email to bohemian_books@yahoo.com and we can share info.
If you are being sued by Portfolio Recovery Associates, let’s chat. I am not an attorney and cannot give legal advice, but I can share my story with you, links to informative websites and encouragement.
It is likely that your experience will be interesting and helpful to me, as well.
And please, post PRA phone numbers that you know of in the comments below. They neighbor spoof, so there are hundreds or thousands of numbers, too many to block.
Will Judge Susan Weaver Overlook Her Pet’s Complete Lack of Argument in His Reply to Motion for Default Judgment?
Arkansas Attorney William “Zac” White filed a motion for default judgment that would transfer title of 40 acres and a house from a trust to his client. For some reason, which I can only speculate about, Zac refused to issue a summons to the “trustee” of the trust.
Judge Susan Kaye Weaver has favored Willy White throughout the proceedings. Attorneys who will remain nameless, as they need to work in courts presided over by the very blond judge, complain that Judge Weaver chooses “favorites”. But it appears to this writer that she does not just favor one party over another. She makes an affirmative effort to throw “the game”.
For example, in the case of Pietrczak v. Rural Revival Living Trust, et al, Judge Weaver dismissed the pro se plaintiff’s counterclaim sua sponte, with no notice, without specifying the inadequacies in the pleading.
A response was filed to the motion for default judgment.
Mr. White had 5 days plus weekends to reply. He waited an extra week, then filed the “response” below.
Besides calling his reply a “response”, he said the Defendant filed the motion for default judgment. Read the title.
If you are not familiar with motion practice, read my objection to the insufficient “response” posted below. I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice. It is an actual court document intended to explain to Judge Weaver why, as much as she hates me, she is not allowed by law to transfer title to the property based on the motion for default judgment.
Baby’s Mother Complains that Judge Susan Weaver Failed to Place Her Son with Family
Dependency Court is the closest thing to a Star Chamber that you can find in the United States.
It is difficult to verify complaints against judicial officers because the dockets on the cases are sealed.
One mother spoke to me about her son being taken from her, her parental rights terminated and instead of placing the child with a relative that lived near the mother, unrelated foster parents get to adopt the child.
The father is a meth user, according to records on Court Connect.
The mother said she tested negative for drugs, but there might have been some inconclusive evidence of a problem.
Because of my own experience with Susan Kaye Weaver, I believe the mother. Here is her story in her own words:
I am so relieved to have found someone I can reach out to.
My son was taken from me by Arkansas DCFS over 1 year ago. He is now 2.
Weaver was my judge.
Lies and completely unbelievable unethical strategies were used against me, some of which were so outrageous I would have thought I was being punked. Like her demand for a maternity test because she didn’t believe I was my son’s mother or questioning the birth certificate DCFS obtained from NM State to be authentic. Mind you DCFS obtained a copy directly from the state themselves. I have 5 other children all of whom are in my care til this day. CYFD from my state was sent to my home to approve it for my son which obviously was safe enough to leave all my other children under my care without even a follow up but still she denied my baby to be returned to me.
My sister went as far as certifying to legitimately foster him with a license out of our state. She put everything into trying to get him back with family. Judge Weaver denied her twice and ran out the clock on her ICPC. Judge Weaver denied my sister under the reason that my sister did not contact the jail where the baby’s father was held to find out what his charges were.
My sister said, and I quote, “I’m here today and concerned with the well being of my nephew, not his father.”
Knowing she looked yet again like a total idiot as many times before in this case, she denied my son his loving true family once again. and terminated my rights in November. I filed an appeal which I honestly have no idea if it even was really filed or anything that’s going on with it because my PD that was assigned to me for this case filed and said an attorney would contact me. It is now February and I cannot get a direct answer from anyone.
I have been completely alone, violated, intimidated. harassed and terrified for my child.
I have reached out to everyone that I possibly could without any recognition. My son developed a UTI the first month he was in foster care and had a rash that lasted over a month. A caseworker took him to ER in the middle of the night while he was supposedly placed with a family who wants to adopt. He has had cuts across his throat and multiple infections, one that covered his face. But no one has said a thing about it.
He’s 2. He’s a baby, my baby and he’s 1000 miles away and there is nothing I can do to help him. This is the worst evil in this world. But I will never give up hope that the Lord will bring him home.
Please, this woman is no good. Children are obviously an object; not a heart and soul. We cannot let this continue. No one should have to live this nightmare under the hands of this corrupt operation!!!! Speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. Protect the poor and the needy. Bring fourth justice for all!!
Amen
***************************
Amen. Pray and act. This is your prayer. Now write these exact words to the JDDC, the Arkansas Judicial Disciplinary and Disability Commission.
How to Declare a Signatory “Incapacitated”: Attorney William Zac White Argues Inconsistent Definitions of Incapacitated
This writer is a defendant in a suit in Searcy County Arkansas presided over by Judge Susan Weaver.
The attorney who wrote the complaint, William Z. White of Heber Springs wrote that my ex-boyfriend, Micheal Pietrczak, was “incapacitated” when he signed a gift deed of property in Witts Spring, Arkansas to a trust of which I am a beneficiary.
The case was dismissed without prejudice and refiled years later, with almost identical claims. Judge Susan Kaye Weaver appears to be bending over backwards to transfer title of the 40 acres and once stunning cabin to Mr. White’s clients.
Attorney William White filed a separate petition regarding people unrelated to me on February 1, 2022. It is a probate matter. A will drafted by “Zac” White, signed December 15, 2022 was added as an exhibit. (IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM E. HAGGARD, DECEASED, Cleburne County Case No. 12PR-21-20)
This is the verbatim definition of “incapacitated” as defined by Attorney White in the will.
“(d) Incapacity
Except as otherwise provided in my Will, a person is deemed incapacitated
in any one of the following circumstances.
(1) The Opinion of Two Licensed Physicians
An individual is deemed incapacitated whenever, in the
opinion of two licensed physicians, the individual is unable
to effectively manage his or her property or financial affairs,
whether as a result of age, illness, use of prescription
medications, drugs or other substances, or any other cause.
An individual is deemed restored to capacity whenever the
individual’s personal or attending physician provides a
written opinion that the individual is able to effectively
manage his or her property and financial affairs.
(2) Court Determination
An individual is deemed incapacitated if a court of
competent jurisdiction has declared the individual to be
disabled, incompetent, or legally incapacitated.
(3) Disappearance, Absence, or Detention
An individual is deemed incapacitated whenever, in my
Trustee’s sole and absolute discretion, he or she cannot
effectively manage his or her property or financial affairs
due to disappearance, absence, or detention (including
incarceration).
A person’s disappearance, absence, or detention (including
incarceration), may be established by an affidavit of my
Trustee describing the relevant circumstances. A third party
dealing in good faith with my Trustee may rely on the
affidavit as conclusive evidence of incapacity.”
In the complaint of Micheal Pietrczak v. Rural Revival Living Trust and Laura Lynn, 65CV-21-20, the plaintiff gave no evidence that two professionals deemed Pietrczak “incapacitated” at or around the time he signed the deed. No professional mental health practitioner deemed Mr. Pietrczak incapacitated.
There was no court order stating Pietrczak was incapacitated at or around the time he signed the deed.
Mr. Pietrczak was present when he signed the deed.
It is interesting to note that W.Z. White represented one son, Colt G. Haggard, and the decedent wrote his second son out of his will entirely about 18 days before his death.
Who Lied Under Oath? Searcy County Arkansas Sheriff Deputy Pierce? Or Notary Brooke Hipp?
Check out the affidavit of Searcy County Sheriff Deputy Ezra Pierce posted below.
The Secretary of State website says notary Brooke Hipp is not authorized to eNotarize.
But the affidavit is signed electronically.
What’s worse, Deputy Pierce has only handed me a set of documents on October 7, 2021.
The attorney, William White would like to prove that I received two separate packets with a summons from Deputy Pierce.
I think Judge Susan Weaver is orchestrating the fraudulent activity. She called a hearing for October 7, 2021 and had four Sheriff officers present to make sure the other five people in the courtroom were safe and orderly.
Mrs. Hipp certified that the affidavit was signed in her presence in Cleburne County on January 14, 2022.
So, why is the document electronically signed?
And how do I get a Searcy County Arkansas Sheriff Deputy to drive an hour to sign an affidavit for me?!?
I can’t even get them to respond to my inquiry about what I contend is a fraudulent affidavit.
The serious questions: Why is Deputy Ezra Pierce not using a judicial council approved proof of service? Why is Deputy Pierce opining on the legal effect of handing the summons and complaint to Laura Hammett as an individual, without the designation “trustee”? Should he be charged with the unauthorized practice of law?
When the Chief Sheriff Deputy in a small town is lying on affidavits to assist an unethical judge to transfer an old lady’s assets, who does the victim report him to?
My suggestion, don’t move to Searcy County Arkansas. It has beautiful scenery and the people in the boonies are good folks, but the po-dunk lawmen and women are a dumber version of John Grisham characters and twice as corrupt.
Law Suit Filed To Help Regular Folks Obtain Legal Guidance Against Debt Buyers Like Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
(Cut and pasted a press release. Sorry the formatting is not right.)
Landmark First Amendment Lawsuit Brought in
New York Challenges Ban on Free Legal Advice
National Nonprofit and New York Pastor bring case against New York
State to challenge unjust and unconstitutional policies that stop
low-income New Yorkers from getting free legal advice to access their
rights.
With COVID-related medical debt mounting, debt and eviction
moratoriums expiring, and student loan repayments restarting in
2022, new lawsuit aims to expand access to legal advice for people
subject to debt collection lawsuits.
New York, New York – Today, Upsolve, a national nonprofit, and Reverend John Udo-Okon, a
Pastor in the South Bronx, filed a First Amendment lawsuit (see full case) in federal court
(SDNY) against New York State to challenge laws that stop low-income New Yorkers from
getting free, safe, and accountable legal advice in debt collection lawsuits. Over 70 million
Americans have debt in collections. Each year, about 4 million of these Americans are sued for
their debt, often for debt that they don’t actually owe or for the wrong amounts. Such actions
commonly include subprime auto-loans, medical debts, or debt bought by third parties. Over
90% of Americans sued for their debt receive no legal representation. The vast majority of
low-income Americans in debt collection lawsuits cannot afford legal fees and over 70% lose by
default, where the court automatically rules against them without considering the underlying
facts at all. It is currently illegal to receive free, vetted, routine legal advice from a trained
social worker, patient advocate, pastor, or any other professional who is not a lawyer.
Upsolve is suing to change that.
Three additional New Yorkers, Liz Jurado, Chris Lepre, and William Evertson, are participating
in the case to represent the millions of Americans each year whose lives are upended because
they cannot afford legal fees.
Liz Jurado was sued for $12,000 by her anesthesiologist for a surprise medical bill she received
after a routine epidural in childbirth. Christopher Lepre, a navy veteran, was unknowingly sold a
broken car, financed with a high-interest loan from subprime auto-lender Credit Acceptance, and
then sued by Credit Acceptance for over $15,000 – even though he gave the car back to the
dealer within three months. William Evertson, a Brooklyn-based social worker, was sued by
large third-party debt buyer Cavalry for a debt that was never his.
Jurado, Lepre, and Evertson all could not afford legal fees to fight back when they were
sued. And it was against the law for each of them to choose to receive free, routine legal advice
from a trained social worker, patient advocate, or any other professional who was not a lawyer.
Each of them automatically lost their case without the court considering any of the facts. Jurado
and Evertson ended up filing bankruptcy. Lepre had his wages garnished and had to borrow
from his 401(k) to make rent.
In America, you’re only guaranteed a free lawyer in criminal cases, not the vast majority of civil
cases, which include debt collection lawsuits. And there aren’t close to enough free
lawyers—especially in light of the educational cost required—to meet the demand of every
single person who needs legal help. Yet every state in America has laws that make it illegal for
low-income people to get free, safe, routine legal advice from trained professionals who aren’t
lawyers.
Upsolve CEO and co-founder, Rohan Pavuluri, said, “We believe that this is the kind of case
all Americans can get behind. We don’t have equal rights under the law. What we have is equal
rights if you can afford a lawyer. This is one of the fundamental and urgent injustices of our
time.”
Reverend John Udo-Okon, a co-plaintiff with Upsolve, already provides social services to some
of the lowest income zip codes in New York City. Rev. Udo-Okon wants to provide legal advice
to those in his community who have been sued for their debt, but it’s illegal for him to do so.
Reverend Udo-Okon said, “Members of my community are shut out from ways to vindicate
their own rights, and are left with what feels to them like an oppressive justice system stacked
against them.”
In response to Upsolve’s lawsuit, NAACP General Counsel, Janette Wallace, said, “It is
vitally important that low-income individuals get the help they need when trying to respond to
debt collection actions. Black Americans are more likely to face these actions, and they’re more
likely to have to do so without being able to call on a lawyer. The rules surrounding the practice
of law should make it easier, not harder, to redress this problem by ensuring access to high
quality legal help for those who need it.”
The lawsuit involves a new initiative Upsolve is launching, the American Justice Movement, to
empower low-income families to get free legal advice from professionals in their communities
who are not lawyers, called Justice Advocates. The American Justice Movement is launching
with a focus on debt collection lawsuits in New York. Justice Advocates include clergy members,
social workers, patient advocates, and other frontline professionals.
The downstream consequences of losing a debt collection lawsuit can include hunger,
homelessness, poverty, and, in some cases, even jail time, which also come at a cost to our
whole society. This problem is urgent in 2022, as experts predict an onslaught of debt collection
activity.
New York’s policies making it illegal to get free legal, safe, and accountable advice are
unconstitutional given the protections enshrined in the First Amendment. Upsolve is
fighting to protect rights the Constitution already guarantees the Americans most in need – like
the challengers in Miranda v. Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright.
In response to the filing, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice Robert McNamara
said, “Upsolve’s lawsuit matters to millions of people nationwide who need basic legal advice
and can’t get it. The only thing laws like New York’s achieve is ensuring that ordinary people
who most need help can’t get practical advice from people who are willing to give it.”
These policies restrict the supply of help available, perpetuate the imbalance of our justice
system towards those who can afford legal fees, and guarantee that we’ll never have equal
rights under the law.
About Upsolve
Upsolve is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, based in NYC, with the mission of helping Americans access
their civil legal rights for free and achieve economic mobility, using technology, education,
community, and advocacy. Upsolve’s first project, an online web application to help families file
bankruptcy on their own for free, has relieved over $400M in debt for families facing medical
bills and other financial shocks. Upsolve also provides free financial and legal education that
reaches about 2 million individuals per year. Upsolve funders include Jack Dorsey, the Hewlett
Foundation, Emergent Ventures at the Mercatus Center, Scott & Cyan Banister, Eric & Wendy
Schmidt, Jim Breyer, Vinod Khosla, Chris & Crystal Sacca, the Robin Hood Foundation, and Y
Combinator. In 2020, TIME named Upsolve one of the Best Inventions of the Year. Upsolve
launched the American Justice Movement in 2022 to empower low-income families to get free,
safe, and accountable legal advice from trained frontline professionals.
Additional Resources Links are given on the American Justice movement website
● Website: AmericanJusticeMovement.org
● See Full Case (Filed Jan 25, 2022)
● Press Kit Images
● We Need a New Civil Right (CNN Opinion, Joe Kennedy III & Rohan Pavuluri)
● Civil Justice for All – Recommendation #4 (American Academy of Arts & Sciences)
● Give People the Law (Democracy Journal, Vivek Maru)
● Legal Advice from Nonlawyers (Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties,
Rebecca Sandefur)
● Unauthorized Practice Of Law’ Rules Promote Racial Injustice (Law360, Rohan Pavuluri)
Open Email to Searcy County Arkansas Sheriff Kenney Cassell
Dear Sherriff Cassell,
Why is the Searcy County Arkansas Sheriff’s Department refusing to respond to my Freedom of Information Act Request for recordings of calls between my telephones and the Sheriff?
The requestor does not need to inform the provider with the purpose of the information. I will tell you, in part, anyhow.
My request is made in part because the information is pertinent to a civil case presided over by Judge Susan Weaver, in which I am a defendant, 65CV-21-20.
I can subpoena the same information, perhaps, but I believe Judge Weaver is colluding with Plaintiff’s counsel William Zac White of Heber Springs.
The Court may delay issuance of the subpoena. Mr. White has refused to comply with requests for production of documents and interrogatories. I filed a motion to compel and Mr. White and the Court ignored my motion.
Production in a FOIA request is required within three days.
If I want a court or law enforcement to help me compel the production, or award me damages for the failure, I can go to a Federal agency or court, rather than to the unethical Searcy County judge.
Mr. White’s office also filed an affidavit that looks like it was approved by Chief Deputy Ezra Pierce on its face. The notary who works for Mr. White attested that Deputy Pierce was physically present, but the signature looks electronic. The notary is not licensed to eNotarize documents.
The affidavit does not use language found on the Judicial Council approved forms.
There is language in the affidavit that sounds like Chief Deputy Pierce gave a legal opinion, that a summons was “duly” served on the Rural Revival Living Trust.
The summons handed to me by Chief Deputy Pierce on October 7, 2021 was directed to “Laura Lynn Hammett”. Not “Trustee”. It was served on an individual, not a trust.
The affidavit claims Chief Deputy Pierce served summons on the trust on October 12, 2021. I did not see Mr. Pierce on October 12, 2021. As far as I know, that is an outright lie.
I mention the affidavit in the same email as the FOIA request because I have a reasonable suspicion that the failure to provide the information requested is caused by the same reason the faulty affidavit was filed and your office has not corrected it. That reason is probably an intent to deprive me of my Constitutional right to equal protection under the law and to help transfer title of 9985 Lick Fork Road to Micheal Pietrczak who will then transfer title to someone else. I am concerned the transfer will be to Mr. White, Judge Weaver, or a straw buyer.
I am not certain when I will file my complaint against you and the Sheriff’s Department, but I will post this email chain on my blog immediately.
Looking forward to a response from you.
Laura Hammett
On Thursday, January 27, 2022, 02:03:41 PM CST, Laura Lynn <bohemian_books@yahoo.com> wrote:
To Sheriff Cassell,
I filed a FOIA request in the email attached hereto.
It has been more than three business days and I have not received a response.
Please call me before close of business today and inform me of when you will have my request fulfilled.
According to the Attorney General’s Freedom of Information Handbook, 19th Edition page 31, “A person who ‘negligently violates’ the FOIA is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor. Ark. Code Ann, [section] 25-19-104.”
Regards,
Laura Hammett (760) 966-6000
On Friday, January 21, 2022, 11:03:18 AM CST, Laura Lynn <bohemian_books@yahoo.com> wrote:
To Searcy County Sheriff’s Office,
This is a Freedom of Information Act request for copies of all recordings to 911 or (870) 448-2340 from (870) 496-2653 and (760) 966-6000 from January 1, 2015 to present.
Please tell me if you have a form I must fill out. The “Forms” page on your website is blank.
Also tell me what charge I will incur and how I may pay.
Thank you,
Laura Lynn Hammett
Monster Alan Friedenthal is Dead!
Thank you to my sister victim of the corrupt family law system in Los Angeles, California, for sending an obituary from the August 18, 2020 death of Alan Friedenthal.
It was interesting to read the glowing tribute by the Met-News, a rag in the Democrat run state that caters to the legal community.
What do you say about an alleged pedophile who destroyed children’s lives and collected lots of money doing it?
The Met-News steered clear of Alan’s history in the family law court, claiming he worked primarily in dependency and delinquency cases.
Maybe they wanted people to believe his cases were sealed, so as not to read through them.
Maybe it sounded better to say Alan separated children from their parents in dependency and juvenile court, where they would have legal counsel protecting the families’ rights. In “family law” the unethical commissioner was able to violate parental rights of anyone who did not have enough money to pay an attorney, or who was outlawyered by Friedenthal’s cronies.
The Met-News did apologetics for the buffoon ex-commissioner concerning the “severe public admonishment” the monster received for making impermissible rulings from the bench against five families. The Met-News discounted the disciplinary action taken by the Commission on Judicial Performance and the California Supreme Court by claiming one of the mothers who was separated from her child completely by Alan Friedenthal made antisemitic comments to the secular Jewish judicial officer.
According to a story by Fox News that featured this writer’s work exposing Alan Friedenthal, there were hundreds of people who complained about the court commissioner.
One of my sources who worked in law enforcement said the rotund man was investigated for inappropriate sexualized conduct toward one of the boys he separated from the child’s biological mother.
My faith is challenged to the limits when I write these words that I know I should say with sincerity:
May he rest in peace.
Judge Susan Weaver Sues Gun Maker Who Failed to Deliver Deeply Discounted AR 15 For Daddy
Judge Weaver is a self-described “daddy’s girl”, according to an interview in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette.
The Faulkner County judge tried to buy an AR 15 for her Dad’s 70th birthday, as you can read in court documents posted below.
Michael Varner, who worked for a gum manufacturer, agreed to build the gun before Mr. Weaver’s birthday at his employee discount rate, $715, according to Mr. Varner.
Unfortunately for Mr. Varner, there was a supply side problem with the parts.
The judge had to make her father’s birthday present a picture and a promise.
Mr. Varner said he agreed to return the $715.
But that was not enough for Judge Weaver. She filed a small claims suit against the Deer, Arkansas gunsmith and won $3,090.00 plus $115 in costs.
Plaintiff Weaver said she bought the gun directly from Wilson Combat for $2,797.20.
The court documents give no explanation of what the extra $290 was for. I guess pain and suffering.
Don’t believe me? Read the court docs posted below.
Judge Weaver garnished Mr. Varner’s wages, according to court documents.
Do you think Judge Weaver is fair and compassionate? Or a greedy tyrant who uses her position of power and influence to line her pockets?
A Higher Law 