Tag Archive | attorney Zac White heber springs
May 7, 2023  

If Judge Susan Weaver has the Audacity to Run for a Second Term, Vote NO!

Judge Weaver gave my house on 40 acres to a man who put his plan to defraud me with the help of the court in writing. Judge Weaver saw the letter.

Worse, I was dismissed with prejudice, meaning on the merits, and Judge Susan Weaver of Searcy County Arkansas said that my co-defendant, my living trust, lost by default.

One attorney told me Judge Weaver just doesn’t understand subtleties in civil law. But this is not the slightest bit hard to understand.

“Arkansas recognizes the ‘common-defense doctrine,’ which holds that if two are sued jointly, one of whom makes default, and the other appears and interposes a successful defense to the action, there can be no doubt but that the plea of the one appearing, will inure to the benefit of the other, and that he will also be entitled to his discharge, notwithstanding the interlocutory judgment by default.

“The test for determining under the common-defense doctrine if an answer will inure to a co-defendant’s benefit is whether the answer of the non-defaulting defendant states a defense that is common to both defendants, because then a successful plea operates as a discharge to all the defendants, but it is otherwise where the plea goes to the personal discharge of the party interposing it.” – Gunter v. Liberty Bank of Arkansas, 92 Ark. App. 163 (2005)

It is more likely that Judge Weaver has a plan to transfer properties out of little old lady’s trusts and into the pocket of her cronies like attorney William Zac White.

Add into the fact set that the transcripts of two hearings on my case were falsified and Judge Weaver won’t allow the recordings to be played in public. That looks like a cover-up.

The real problem is that the Court of Appeals justices, Judge Billy Roy Wilson and Judge Lee P. Rudofsky have each been informed of my allegations and none have done anything I asked for or anything else I am aware of to correct the injustice.

Susan Weaver is doing a lot of damage during her time on the bench. Her victims should be compensated by the government that failed to make a timely correction. That may never happen. But the citizens of this state are right to think there is no integrity in our judiciary.

My suggestion is to vote the elected judges out of office and make certain that the federal judges are not confirmed for any promotion.

May 3, 2023  

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: The Arkansas Court of Appeal’s Speed of Molasses Deprives Me of Justice

Judge Susan Kaye Weaver gave a property worth over $200,000 from my living trust to an irrevocable trust created by Attorney William White specifically to hold the property on behalf of his client, Mike Pietrczak.

I was named in the same suit, but dismissed with prejudice after William Zac White’s helper gave me the original handwritten, signed letter by his client that admits to committing fraud against me.

I filed two maximum length briefs in the Arkansas Court of Appeals on November 23, 2022, arguing amongst other things the Common Defense Doctrine. One was written as an individual, the other as the sole settlor, trustee and beneficiary of the trust.

The Common Defense Doctrine is precedence that “…one whose liability is dependent on, or derived from, the liability of one who is exonerated in an earlier suit…on the same facts may take advantage of the bar of the prior judgment even though he was not a party to the earlier actions or in privity with the defendant therein. Ted Saum & Company v. Swaffar, 237 Ark. 971, 377 S.W.2d 606 (1964).”

Mr. White did not bother to respond to the brief. Why should he when Susan Weaver seems to be his lap dog?

While waiting for the COA to decide if my unopposed briefs were accurate, my bank account has dwindled to nothing and I am relying on a $600 per month pension, loans and gifts to eat. (I had a writing gig that helped me pay off my loans to zero, but now I am starting to feel the pinch again.)

And really, how long will the $199,000 the fraudsters got for selling the property last? Mike Pietrczak is a lifelong drug addict and alcoholic. The trustee, Walter Pietrczak, is a broke ass loser who was a conspirator in the fraud. Seems like the money will be gone before the justices can finish scratching their heads.

That is why I asked the appellate justices to refer the case to the proper prosecutorial agencies that would handle honest services fraud. Judge Weaver could have used her favorite excuse, (I don’t know nuthin’ about nuthin’), for her absurd orders. But she conspired with Court reporter Jana Perry to falsify what was said in a couple hearings, to try to make her rulings seem legit. Then she lied in a court document by saying she listened to the recordings and the transcripts were accurate.

Incarcerating Susan Weaver will not put food on my table, but it will provide me with a happy ending to the book about Arkansas Injustice that is in my writing queue. The residual income the book generates is not restitution in any way…it is derived from my own labor. There will be some poetic justice though, in that.

April 12, 2023  

What Happens When Lawyers Lie? Business as Usual.

Not all lawyers are seedy shysters.

Far too many are. The judges and ethics commissions who are tasked with keeping the bad lawyers in check are either not able to keep up with it, or they prefer to protect the status quo.

I’ve written about a few of the most egregious. William Spiller, an appointed minor’s counsel in California. Another minor’s counsel, Kenneth P. Sherman, who finally asked to be recused from my custody case after endangering my son’s life and giving both my sons a serious handicap in their journey to manhood. William Zac White in Arkansas, who shouted “bitch” in the courthouse and called me a “bitch” during a hearing, obtained a $200,000 property for his client as part of a fraud that Mr. White was well aware of, and obtained a default on a case where he did not serve summons on the defendant (which was set aside later).

But what of the lawyers who probably want to be good guys, but the pesky truth gets in the way?

My good childhood friend who is a lawyer in California once asked me what the Bible would say about a situation she encountered. Opposing counsel on a case filed a document with a proof of service that said he delivered the document to my friend’s office on a Friday, but he actually slipped it under her door sometime during the weekend. The document had a fax stamp on the bottom that showed opposing counsel faxed it to his client for signature Friday evening.

In one of my cases, California Attorney Keith Cochran represented one person in two different capacities. The clerk erroneously only entered Mr. Cochran’s client once on the electronic docket. Instead of asking the clerk to add the second capacity, Mr. Cochran left his client as an individual off the representation statement on the cover of the response to the complaint. I asked the clerk to add the individual to the docket, which he did, and filed a motion for default. That motion was denied with the excuse that the individual was referred to on page 6 of the response in a footnote. That excuse might have flown if presented in a motion to set aside default, but it was a fatal error for Judge Janis Sammartino to decide there was no default and motion to set aside default was not necessary.

I am suing notorious debt buyer Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of publicly traded PRA Group, Inc. PRA has ripped off hundreds of thousands of people by suing or trying to gain voluntary payment on unverifiable debt. Last month Portfolio Recovery stipulated to the second 7-figure settlement of complaints lodged against it by the CFPB that discuss this conduct.

After I filed suit PRA set my alleged account balance to zero. They did not say they were “waiving” or “cancelling” the debt. They did not send me or file a 1099-C cancellation of debt form with the I.R.S. PRA’s attorney claimed in open court that the debt was waived, instead of admitting there was no reliable record of the debt and no one knows what the borrowed money was used to purchase.

PRA attorneys are from prestigious lawfirms, Rose Law firm of Hillary Clinton fame and Troutman Pepper, a big-business defense firm.

Portfolio Recovery basically told the I.R.S. one thing and the court another.

If PRA has reason to believe the debt truly existed, then failing to file the 1099-C was a violation of 26 CFR section 1.6050P.

If PRA filed the 1099-C, they would be in bigger trouble for tax fraud. It is easy for PRA to bully individuals, but they don’t want to take on the I.R.S.

(Spoiler alert: I have the address for the I.R.S.)

The problem is that many judges look the other way or poo-poo the attorneys’ transgressions.

Judge Lee P. Rudofsky opined that the failure of the debt buyer to put in writing to me and the IRS that the debt was waived or cancelled was not proof that the debt did not exist at the time PRA called me and wrote letters demanding that I owed $2,297.63.

It is hard to believe that a Cornell and Harvard graduate can be that naive. But a belief is not a fact according to Judge Rudofsky.

If you have a bridge to sell, perhaps Judge Rudofsky is in the market for one.

April 1, 2023  

A Little Light Music for Your Listening Pleasure

When I finally obtain a copy of the audio recordings of the hearings Backwoods Judge Susan Kaye Weaver and side kick Court Reporter Jana Perry fictionalized in the transcripts of the hearings, I hope rap singer “Afroman” will collaborate with me on a song or two that will memorialize the corrupt court’s conduct.

Joseph Edgar Foreman, AKA Afroman, is being sued by some Adams County, Ohio sheriff deputies. Afroman used surveillance video of the sheriffs breaking down his door and searching his home to illustrate two music videos. I chuckled a few times while I watched the videos that already have millions of views on YouTube. Apparently, the police officers found no humor in the videos what-so-ever.

Watch the music videos Lemon Pound Cake and Will You Help Me Repair My Door here and here.

The invasion of privacy lawsuit would be humorous if there was not a good chance that corrupt judges would let it proceed and maybe even let the police officers prevail. That is the direction our legal system has taken. First judges gave themselves absolute judicial immunity from civil lawsuits. It takes an act of God to get the judicial ethics commissions and public integrity unit of the FBI to rein in the corrupt courts. Then just about every public employee, including cops, were extended “quasi-judicial” immunity.

Now these Adams County cops are demanding that video footage of them searching a man’s home and taking about $5,000 of his cash not be played for the public. (There was no illegal substances nor kidnapping victims found on the property, despite the police making claims that resulted in a search warrant.)

Here’s my music video concept. First an intro that says something like “Arkansas Injustice. Arkansas Injustice. Just listen and learn about Arkansas Injustice.”

Then we will use segments of the recording that Judge Weaver does not want the public to hear; but we will change the cadence when repeating certain phrases. “The motion for continuance must be in writing, must be in writing, must be in writing.”

We will use the read-along tool used in children’s videos, with a bouncing ball touching each word of the transcript in order. But the words spoken will not be the same as the written words, because they are not.

Where attorney William Zac White very loudly says “Bitch” and that was not captured on the transcript, the bouncing ball can land on red text alone on the screen that says “BLEEP”.

There will be an animated reenactment of the hearings interspersed with the lyrics. During this animation, the lip movement of the characters will be pronounced but inconsistent with the words spoken. It will be like watching a Japanese Karate movie dubbed poorly in English. The lip movement will be completely out of sync with what was said.

Citizens who have their Constitutional rights violated by rogue government officials usually cannot recover civil damages for the misconduct. Will the courts also try to limit our ability to create art and literature that exposes the bad behavior?

March 31, 2023  

Arkansas Judge Susan Kaye Weaver Up to Her Old Tricks

For the sterile filed version of this motion scroll down to the downloadable version of what I filed today in Faulkner County Circuit Court.

I just made this a bit more readable by changing it to first person and changing a few words, such as calling Judge Weaver “Judge Weaver” instead of “the Court”. I had to refrain from calling her something else a little more colorful.

Judge Susan Weaver is not allowed to dismiss my case against Shelter Insurance and its agent, Jeff Jennings Insurance Agency, Inc for the following reasons:

Judge Weaver notified me that she intended to dismiss my case for lack of prosecution on March 20, 2023, but her notification went to my spam folder, so I learned about it later than intended.

I was able to respond timely, anyhow.

Judge Weaver’s plan to dismiss for lack of prosecution is bizarre.

First, it is the unethical judge who has failed to promptly dispose of the matters before her. I waited patiently for her to decide the Motion for Recusal filed September 27, 2021 and the Motions to Dismiss filed October 20, 2021 and October 28, 2021.

Second, there is a related case, Pietrczak v. Laura Lynn and Rural Revival Living Trust, 65-CV-21-20, that is on appeal, which addresses common issues with this case that should be decided consistently. Judge Weaver appears to have delayed and is now evading deciding the pending motions on the merits because she intends to make contradictory orders against me on the two cases.

The Motion for Recusal was brought in major part because Judge Susan Kaye Weaver presiding “conspire[ed] [with Court Reporter Jana Perry and Pietrczak attorney William “Zac” White] to make an inaccurate transcription of the hearing of August 4, 2021 [in Pietrczak].” Motion for Recusal ¶ 1.

I filed a lawsuit for Judge Weaver’s violation of my civil rights under the color of law under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Judge Weaver, Jana Perry and Pietrczak attorney William “Zac” White, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas case no. 4:21-CV-857-BRW. The 1983 case was dismissed (erroneously) based on absolute judicial immunity and Rooker-Feldman. I appealed. The appeal was denied summarily before briefing.

I had an acute case of Hashimoto’s Disease which caused me to be too fatigued to take the 1983 case further at that time. (I am trying to recover by following a strict dietary protocol and using stress management techniques. The Court’s misconduct is a major stressor which exacerbates Hashimoto’s Disease and I intend to file a second 1983 case because of the subsequent falsification of the transcript of the Pietrczak hearing held March 17, 2022.) There is a “Catch 22”, as legal work that addresses debilitating stress causes more stress.

By relying on Rooker-Feldman for her defense in the 1983 suit, Judge Weaver should make a concerted effort to resolve the issue of whether falsification of the transcripts in one case concerning Hammett shows bias against Hammett by the conspirator judge.

I listed each entry on Court Connect that showed that the motion for recusal and defendants’ motions to dismiss my Second Amended Complaint were fully briefed by November 17, 2021, well within the time allowed by rules of civil procedure.

Judge Weaver failed to issue an order on the Motion for Recusal and the MTDs. There was no further activity since November 17, 2021.

On September 21, 2021 the Court issued an order dismissing the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend. The Court required Plaintiff to add “Rural Revival Living Trust” as a necessary party pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. Proc. 19 [despite my repeated efforts to educate the airheaded judge as to the requirement to name a trustee, rather than a trust as a party].

I added the Trustee of the Rural Revival Living Trust as a defendant, because I personally paid the premium for the trustee after Shelter required the trustee to be named on the policy.

In the Brief supporting the Jennings MTD, Jennings argues that [the principal that] Plaintiff naming the trust as a defendant [is not allowed] is “axiomatic as suing oneself in any capacity raises the following questions — and many others.” [Dictionary.com defines “axiomatic” as an adjective meaning “pertaining to or of the nature of an axiom; self-evident; obvious.”

In Pietrczak, Judge Susan Weaver dismissed me as a defendant, but then proceeded to find against the Rural Revival Living Trust by default. This is one issue on appeal, labeled the Common Defense Doctrine.

It is a clear error and appearance of bias for the Court to agree I as an individual and the trust are “oneself” in this case but treat me as an individual and the trust as separate defendants with non-aligned interests in Pietrczak. The Court denied my motion to intervene in Pietrczak. It is probable that Judge Weaver neglected to rule on pending motions in this case to evade providing me with more reason to overturn the order in Pietrczak which basically stole my property and gave it to a man who gave a hand-written letter describing the fraud he was committing on me to his attorney William “Zac” White.

Also, the appearance of bias of Judge Susan Weaver and her refusal to settle the record by playing the audio recording of the falsified hearings in open court is an issue on appeal in Pietrczak that should affect the outcome of this case.

Brief

     ARCP Rule 41 “Section (b) also marks a significant variation from FRCP 41(b). Under this rule, the trial court has the right to dismiss on its own motion a claim for failure to prosecute the action or failure to comply with these rules or any order of the court. Under the Federal Rule, such dismissal must be on motion of the defendant or other party affected.” Reporter’s notes to Rule 41. Judge Susan Weaver is abusing her power by calling her own failure to decide the matters assigned to the judge as required by Judicial Code of Conduct Rule 2.7 a failure of the litigant to prosecute.

     “A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the [] impartiality of the judiciary [].” Judicial Code of Conduct 1.2. Deciding two cases involving the same litigant and the same issues differently is a clear indication of bias. Refusal of this Court to issue the contrary ruling on this case until after the appeal of the related case and taking it a step further by dismissing this case on false grounds violates the Rules of Judicial Conduct and the Plaintiff’s fundamental Constitutional right to equal protection under the law.

     Wherefore, Plaintiff asks this Court to continue the proceedings on its calendar, and to issue a reasoned order on the two pending motions, considering the orders made in Pietrczak in the interim.

amended-motion-application-to-continue-on-calendarDownload
March 17, 2023  

Stink Eye: Should Judge Weaver be allowed to dictate a litigant to keep a good pokerface?

“Lucky” was playing in a poker game with me last night; a 1/2 NLH at the Hard Rock in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Lucky is a tough looking young man, about the same age as my son. He is Hispanic, wears a full beard, dark shades and muff style headphones. He has a take no prisoners style of play.

I was dealt an AQ off-suit, which I consider to be a good playable hand. If I was leading off with the betting, I’d probably raise from the minimum $2 bet to $6. But Lucky got to bet before me. With a dramatic display of calculation, picking out a few chips, then pausing and adding a few more from a different color stack, he announced his bet as $23 dollars and strew the chips across the table with aplomb.

Any bet over $20 pre-flop at this table meant a premium hand (or a bluff). He probably had an AK, KK, or AA and dominated me. So, after glaring at him, I folded.

Lucky took off his headphones and addressed me personally for the first time since I joined the game. Really he was talking about me in the third person to the whole group, but he intended to engage me. I don’t remember his exact words. It was something to the effect of look at the way she stared at me. She was harsh.

The hand played out and Lucky took down a sizable pot when the last remaining caller folded after the river. Lucky showed us his pocket jacks. JJ against AQ is actually a coin toss. There was an Ace on the turn, so if I had not folded, I would have won the hand.

I acted contrary to my own rules and told the players what I folded. We had a good laugh together and I told the men about a comment that Judge Susan Weaver made to me. It was during the hearing where she trampled all over my rights to due process and announced her intention to give my personal property and real estate held in trust to a man who put his intention to defraud me of $75,000 in writing.

Judge Weaver said to stop giving her “stink eye”. At the time she said that, I had a credible fear that the judge also intended to find me in contempt of court and incarcerate me. Her stink eye comment sounded like a set-up to find me in direct contempt.

Judges have gotten away with throwing people in jail for less. They should not. They should not be allowed to tyrannize litigants who are merely expressing disapproval of the judges’ errant denial of civil rights through a non-disruptive facial expression.

It is not as if I called Judge Weaver a bitch. Opposing counsel William White called me “bitch” loudly in court that day and Judge Weaver pretended not to hear it. Judge Weaver’s longtime colleague Court Reporter Jana Perry pretended not to hear it either, when she fabricated what was said in the fictionalized transcript she created.

My look of righteous anger, though, that Judge Weaver found worth noting for the record.

Lucky made me realize just how evil Susan Kaye Weaver was to demand that I hide my dismay with her Draconian commands. Lucky noticed the intense look I gave him, also. And we were playing poker. The whole idea behind poker is to mask your emotions, because showing your emotions conveys information that can help your opponent make educated decisions on future hands. You’re not playing a hand, you’re playing a game.

When the unethical jurist abused her power by forbidding me from defending my own property rights, I was justifiably angry. There is nothing disruptive about me looking at the judge with an angry look on my face. Had she not commented, there would be no record of my disapproval until I filed my appeal.

Judge Susan Weaver wants to bully and bluff and for me to maintain my best poker face. I complied that day in court, for fear of having my 60-year-old body thrown in jail. If I had the energy, I would have protected my Constitutional right to a fair trial from being treated as a game. (Hopefully the Court of Appeals addresses the issue when ruling on my unopposed appellate brief.)

February 18, 2023  

Judges Who Are Dumb Enough to Make Unethical Comments On The Record

There are a few good attorneys. Steve Lehto seems to be one of them.

He discusses crazy court decisions and stories that would be funny if they were not so serious. Click here to watch a video about a judge who made sexist and disturbing comments from the bench and actually was disciplined (lightly).

One of the points Mr. Lehto makes is that the man is too dumb to be a judge if he doesn’t realize there will be a record of his inappropriate comments. I agree.

Now retired and deceased California Commissioner Alan Friedenthal did the same thing while presiding over my case. He said he read my blog and went through a list of what he disagreed about. He eventually was disciplined with a figurative slap on the wrist for what he did to me and many others. Fox News covered the story and featured me in a segment called “Lost in the System: Imbalanced Justice”.

Al should have gone to Arkansas Judge Susan Weaver for advice. When Suzy says things she does not want the public to hear or lets her favored attorneys cuss at old ladies in court, the judge has her old friend and colleague Court Reporter Jana Perry make an inaccurate transcript. Then Judge Weaver refuses to make the actual recording of the hearing available to the public.

The Arkansas Court of Appeals and the Judicial Disciplinary and Disability Commission are aware of my allegations and have not taken any action to correct the wayward judge thus far.

Maybe they figure that Susan Weaver is smart enough to cover-up her bad behavior, so she is smart enough to be a judge.

February 10, 2023  

Why is it Taking the Arkansas Court of Appeals Justices and JDDC So Long to Rein in Judge Susan Weaver?

Time for me to vent.

Every day that goes by is another day that attorney William Zac White and his client have to spend or hide the assets they obtained from me by honest services fraud.

They lied in court and Judge Susan Weaver, knowing they were lying, granted them everything they asked for, literally. They used the excuse that the property they were transferring was held in a trust and the trust was not represented by a licensed attorney. But Judge Weaver gave my personal property that was not held in trust to her co-conspirators. I was forbidden from protesting in court under the pretext that I was going to be dismissed from the case with prejudice.

All this went down while COVID was still an issue.

Courts around the country are backing off the COVID protocols now. But during the kangaroo court hearing set up to transfer my property, most courts were making every effort to contain the disease, as reported by Eversheds Sutherland LLP on Lexocology. (Discussing Texas courts in their article.) “As of December 31, 2022, the Court had issued fifty-nine Emergency Orders allowing court participants to, among other things, appear for any hearing, deposition, or other proceeding remotely; consider as evidence sworn statements or testimony given remotely; and conduct court proceedings away from the court’s usual location with reasonable notice and access to the participants and the public.”

I had requested a stay of proceedings 12 days before the March 17, 2022 hearing. Judge Weaver denied the stay. She did not make an alternative ruling that would allow me to appear by Zoom. Because Judge Weaver and her close colleague Court Reporter Jana Perry fictionalized the prior hearing held by Zoom, it is likely they had a concern that I would have law enforcement in the room with me or impermissibly make my own recording. They intended to fictionalize the March hearing, as well. And they did.

My medical records submitted as an exhibit were supposed to be filed under seal. They were not. They were then included in the Clerk’s record for my appeal. Now the document was removed from the public docket of the circuit court case. If you are with a news reporting agency, a public service law firm or law enforcement, please email me and I will hook you up with a copy for verification purposes. I am attaching my motion below, in which I describe the results. I was not tried for perjury yet, despite Judge Weaver and Willy White’s apparent desire to incarcerate me, so my rendition is probably accurate.

Most importantly, my absolute lymphocyte count was low. Normal is 1,000 to 5,000 cells per microliter of blood. Mine was 700.

According to Dr. Richard Foxx, M.D. on Doctor’s Health Press: “These cells help prevent infections by bacteria and viruses and also fight off infections already present, and a low count of these cells also increases the chance of certain types of cancer developing, mostly types of leukemia, lymphoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma.” This was written in 2018, pre-COVID-19. I will hazard a guess that absolute lymphocytes in a healthy person fight off the COVID virus also.

Regardless, I described symptoms of having COVID and had not been tested yet. (I tested the day or two before the hearing and tested negative, but Judge Weaver did not know that.) Judge Susan Kaye Weaver was willing to expose me, my two elderly court watching friends, court personnel, the Sheriff and three of his deputies, Mr. White and his chain-smoking client with bad lungs all to the virus. She knew she was not going to let me argue, object or present evidence during the hearing. The only reasons I can think of that she would require the hearing to be in person and have me show up were 1) so the team of sheriff deputies could throw me in jail for an invented contempt of court; and 2) to make it more difficult to have third parties hear the actual proceedings, making it easier to get away with the planned fictionalization.

The Justices at the Court of Appeals have all this information before them since I filed my appellate brief on November 23, 2022. There was no opposition filed. How long can it take to decide that Judge Weaver was not upholding her judicial oath to protect the Constitution and reverse her orders?

filed-motion-stay-of-proceedingsDownload
January 26, 2023  

How Quickly We Forget: How Hitler Transferred Property and What Came Next

Americans love watching movies about the Nazis. The vast majority of us are rooting against the murderous thugs.

I am watching a series on Prime called “Hunters”. It stars Al Pacino as a Nazi Hunter. There is an FBI agent who suspects a rash of deaths are murders by a vigilante group determined to eradicate war criminals. I think she will eventually see the beauty in truth espoused by the self-appointed judge, jury and executioners.

Stylistically, Hunters has comic strip undertones.

Sadly, people, including some Jews, view the Holocaust through this animated lens.

The Jewish people have a mantra. “Forgive, but do not forget.”

Yet history is repeating itself right here in the land of the free.

I am the victim of a Hitleresque judicial officer named Susan Kaye Weaver.

She took my property, both real and personal, in a hearing in which I was forbidden to defend against the improper seizure.

The Arkansas judge used the excuse that the real property was held in trust. She said that if I spoke on behalf of the trust, I would be committing the unauthorized practice of law. She had the County Sheriff and three deputies on hand who could arrest me at her whim. She knew I am ill and ruled with a hardened heart. (I have an acute auto-immune disease and gave the Court copies of a recent blood test that would indicate that I should be resting at home; not driving 3.5 hours roundtrip to attend kangaroo court.)

This same judge, in the same case, made a sua sponte ruling to dismiss my countersuit against the fraudster who was suing me. But, in the hearing of March 17, 2022, I, the trustee and settlor of the trust that held the title to the real estate, was in the courtroom and Judge Weaver failed to question me as a witness. Judges are allowed to question witnesses. Judge Weaver questioned the fraudster. She did not ask any questions that would elicit the truth, but I know she knows she could have asked me as trustee what my side of the story was. She had already read my counterclaim and exhibits throughout the prior year of litigation. She did not want to see the truth.

She just wanted to give property that was mine or meant to be mine to attorney William Zac White’s client and to pay Mr. White.

She had the Gestapo standing by in case I protested.

You can read the court documents on Court Connect, case 65CV-21-20 and appeal CV-22-435. The transcript is posted below, but I warn you, Court Reporter Jana Perry made substantial falsifications to the transcript in order to support Judge Weaver and Attorney White’s agenda.

michael-pietrczak-vs.-rural-revival-living-trust-and-laura-lynn-hammett-65cv-21-20-transcript-and-exhibit-u-1Download
January 23, 2023  

Is Arkansas a Good Place to Invest or Retire? NO!

Yes, Arkansas has natural beauty and cheap real estate prices compared to many states.

But judges like Susan Kaye Weaver in Faulkner County and Searcy County give permission to attorney William Zac White to take real estate and personal property from anyone who does not have enough money to hire a lawyer at $300 per hour.

My property and property rights were taken from me without just cause and without a trial.

Property held in a trust was also given to Mr. White’s client and presumably Mr. White.

I am not making this up. It is 100% true.

You can read the docket for Pietrczak v. Laura Lynn and Rural Revival Living Trust on Court Connect. (65CV-21-20)

I appealed the orders. My briefs were filed timely on November 23, 2022. Pietrczak and Attorney William Zac White failed to file an opposing brief. Why bother when the Court consistently finds in their favor without filing any meaningful brief? (CV-22-435)

This is not the first time Judge Susan Weaver transferred property rights without requiring the recipient to follow procedure. See matters involving Richard Gawenis and the Zelda Walls Living Trust, 71CV-20-119, 71PR-19-91 and CV-21-349.

There, the errant judge corrected herself on one lower court case, but not the other, only after the trust paid an attorney for representation. The correction was upheld on appeal.

I left my home state to buy a house and retire in Arkansas. Now I am forced to go back to work, at 60, with a disease that causes fatigue and is triggered by stress.

How do I know Judge Weaver was wrong? I was present in the three hearings and read the official transcripts created by Court Reporter Jana Perry. Ms. Perry’s renditions were fictionalized. But Judge Weaver and Ms. Perry refuse to play the recordings of the hearings, the best evidence, for the public. Thus far the Court of Appeals justices have also refused to settle the record.

If you are considering moving your company or retiring to Arkansas, feel free to call me first. You will probably decide I am an intelligent and reasonable woman, and that I am not exaggerating about the corruption of the Arkansas judiciary. Your assets will not be safe in this state.

Laura Hammett (760) 966-6000

« Older Posts
Newer Posts »