How I Cope with A Corrupt Judge like Susan Weaver of Arkansas
This is not legal advice. I am not an attorney.
This is not a replacement for seeking mental health services from a professional. I have not studied psychotherapy nor a related field formally.
This is just one friend speaking to another about how she copes with corrupt judges.
It is a corrupt system.
Not every judge is corrupt though. When there is an honest judge presiding, our legal system is a thing of beauty.
When there is an unethical judge, it is a nightmare.
This is what I do when I find myself living the nightmare.
I tell myself, “I will do what I can do.”
If you find yourself in front of a judge like Susan Weaver, I know you are frustrated.
I know you are afraid.
Give yourself permission to feel your feelings.
Expect miracles. Let go and breathe.
Take each next right step. Do what you can do.
I use yoga in the morning to find calm and try to take that calm with me into the day.
Sometimes circumstances are out of control. For example, Judge Weaver dismissed me as a defendant from a case on the merits, but then transferred a $199,000 property that was in a trust that I was trustee and beneficiary of to a man who put his plan to defraud me of $75,000 in writing. Oh, his attorney will probably get a huge portion of that and who knows, some may find its way into Judge Weaver’s pocket. I am just speculating. But no one is as dumb as Judge Weaver appears to be from her decisions. The injustice she metes out must be purposeful. (Judge Weaver was adamant that I make no argument or provide evidence that would benefit the trust. She threatened me with incarceration if I represented the trust.)
Breathe.
Speak to a therapist. If you don’t have good insurance, there is a free 12-step program called CoDA that is full of people who are learning to set boundaries. Church pastors and their wives are usually helpful to speak with as well.
For me, it is empowering to write about the problem.
I had a corrupt commissioner presiding on a custody case in California. When I wrote about my experience, bunches of other parents contacted me with similar stories. Eventually the bad judicial officer left the bench. He died two years later at the age of 64.
There are people who are employed on the taxpayer’s payroll who are supposed to protect us from unethical judges. In Arkansas, they are with the JDDC (Judicial Disciplinary and Disability Commission).
Usually, these commissions are a big waste of money, a paper tiger.
The JDDC tried to discipline Judge Susan Weaver when she first took office in the Circuit Courts. But Judge Weaver beat them at the appellate court.
Yes, it is frustrating when you are forced to take on people who have power and control, who seem untouchable. You may feel like you cannot possibly win.
But allowing hypocrites to take your property, liberty and maybe even life without putting up a fight is a certain loss.
There is peace in pursuing justice to its end.
Namaste and Shalom.
Email: bohemian_books@yahoo.com
Can A Kleptocratic Court Conceal Its Own Wrongdoing by Denying a FOIA Request?
“(c) Whoever corruptly–
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”
– 18 U.S.C.A. § 1512 (West)
This writer is having a heck of a time obtaining an audio recording of three hearings presided over by Judge Susan K. Weaver of Arkansas Circuit Court.
The recordings, taken with the official transcript created by Court Reporter Jana Perry, are evidence that I want to use in several proceedings.
Judges have absolute judicial immunity against civil liability for any act taken with jurisdiction from the bench. Thus far they have not bestowed immunity from criminal prosecution on themselves. But Judge Weaver and her ilk may be working on that right now.
Judicial Ethics Commissions: Paper Tigers Eating Your Tax Dollars
Judge Susan Weaver of the Searcy County Arkansas Circuit Court and her sidekick, Court Reporter Jana Perry have created a paper record of a case against me that is distinctly different than what I remember happening in three hearings.
It is my word against theirs, as long as they keep the audio recordings of the hearings under wraps. And they have.
There are several channels that may lead to an order against Judge Weaver to make the recordings public.
One channel is to have the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission issue a subpoena as part of an investigation. But, I filed a complaint on August 15, 2021. The transcript was not issued yet, so the complaint was about what happened in the hearing of August 4, 2021.
Apparently, the Commission decided there was not enough evidence to listen to the recordings. On May 11, 2022, about nine months into the “investigation” the Commission issued a dismissal notice of the complaint. (See a copy posted below.)
What next?
I can make a Freedom Of Information Act request for two of the recordings.
My first FOIA request for the first hearing’s recording was denied by no other than Judge Susan Weaver.
When the dishonorable judge denies the next FOIA request, I will file an appeal. I can’t be the only one who thinks the fox should not be allowed to guard the chickens.
There is a subpoena for the tapes in another related case. Of course, Attorney General Leslie Rutlege’s office came to the rescue of the allegedly criminal court employees by filing a pending motion to quash the subpoena. The judge on the related case is Honorable and there is a chance a light will aim right at the falsified transcripts. But the Good Judge used to work in the AG’s office as Solicitor General. The pressure to quash the subpoena must be fierce.
There will be an appeal of Judge Weaver’s rulings on the underlying case. As a part of the appeal, I will file a motion to settle the record. Judge Weaver denied a similar motion. Again, Foxy “protecting” the hen house.
Finally, there will likely be a second 42 USC 1983 suit filed against Jana Perry and William White, the attorney who profits most from the alleged honest services fraud. My first 1983 suit which was based on only the first fictionalized transcript was dismissed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson before allowing discovery. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal sua sponte. Something about judicial immunity and Rooker-Feldman.
What will the JDDC say when the recordings are finally played in public and my memory (and notes) served me well?
“Oops”?
Nobody Mention the King is Naked, Please.
This is a repost of a piece I wrote in 2014. Names and places have changed, but the system is broken in the same way.
For many years I risked the wrath of the people who have taken over the court in Los Angeles, by writing about some of the more public acts of corruption. I did not have to dig too deep or have any magic powers. I lived 120 miles away from L.A. and drove up there just for court dates and on the off chance I might be able to see my then minor child.
Commissioner Alan Friedenthal, who the California Supreme Court finally ruled showed bias against me, had ordered and maintained that mother and child should be completely separated. DCFS did not recommend that. No psychiatrist or psychologist was consulted. My record was spotless…except for that one parking ticket I got in Studio City. My lifelong medical record shows that I am hesitant to even take prescription drugs and I have never been a drinker.
My situation was not unique. My new friends Janette Isaacs, R.V., “Sam” and the rest all had nearly identical stories. In fact, I was once “accused” of writing something threatening about Al Friedenthal by Sargeant Wheatcroft; But the posting he was griping about was not even written by me. The author mentioned her “new husband” in the post, and I was a single woman and not in a serious relationship yet. The only difference between me and most of the others was my willingness to use my true identity, at the risk of illegal retaliation. And “the court” did retaliate.
Years have passed. My children both aged out and we are able to enjoy each other again. We are healing, slowly. The scars are deep.
One of the worst scars is that we have no faith in our legal system. We distrust police and judges. We also fear other humans, because they may be able to harm us with impunity.
I have a simple legal dispute in San Diego now. It is a property dispute, based on contract and an interference with that contract.
The defendants in that case thought I would not be able to afford an attorney to protect my rights. They did not know I self-studied law and had the best training any lawyer could ask for…taking on the team of government paid attorneys and judges in LASC. My civil case should be a slam dunk.
Unfortunately, I have a handicap. One of the bad apples from Los Angeles, Tamila Ipema, transferred to San Diego. It is possible she will spoil the whole bunch.
Judge Ipema presided over a restraining order hearing involving one of the conspirators in my civil case and me. Though she did not go as far as Judge Elizabeth Feffer, issuing a restraining order that would need to be fought to the U.S. Supreme Court, she did not give me protection from the other party, either. The other party claimed to have video of me threatening him, but refused to show that video to the court. He did enter an article I wrote as evidence. The article was titled “Is The LASC a Racketeering Organization?” It was written December 30, 2010. Three years ago.
I objected to this evidence as irrelevant. Judge Ipema admitted it.
Here is the entire text. Look for anything that looks remotely threatening to anyone, that would warrant a restraining order. Also note that Tamila did not disclose that she worked in L.A. Family Law until 2008 and came up through the ranks with Commissioner Alan Friedenthal.
**************************************************
Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, released a proposed schematic organizational chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). They wrote: “The organizational chart proposes that LA-JR is widespread and well established, is supported by justice system agencies, and colludes with law firms and financial institutions large and small. However, It should be noted that the LA-JR today is primarily focused on a white-collar crime, and as such – is a loosely organized enterprise. Court Counsel Frederick Bennett, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, and Judge Jacqueline Connor are listed in leadership positions.”
Is the Los Angeles Superior Court a racketeering organization whose members can and should be indicted under RICO laws, much as the mafia?
Most people think of racketeers as God Father characters, Jimmy Hoffa or Scarface. They think of gangsters toting guns and making extortionist threats in the shadows late at night. They think of bricks of cocaine and porno.
Ah…recent exposure of an often appointed custody evaluator named Dr. Joseph Kenan may bridge the gap between the perception of the Court as a professional, decorious establishment, and a typical racketeering organization.
Even though Local Rules of Court 14.21 does not specify that custody evaluators should not be men known to associate with porn stars and run alleged crack houses, it seems the judicial officers responsible for making delicate decisions about custody should have at least a smidgeon of common sense.
This reporter questions the motivation for Judge Elizabeth Feffer, Judge Scott Gordon, Commissioner Alan Friedenthal and others for accepting evaluations from a man whose reputation is of throwing drug fests and hiring male prostitutes. Let’s just say the integrity of the court is brought into disrepute.
Where is the CJP while the Los Angeles Superior Court gains the reputation of ordering payment to and services of men like Dr. Kenan, AKA Joe-blo? Well, they are in San Francisco. Nuff said.
*******************************************
Welcome to Arkansas, 1954. Um, sorry 2022.
Judge Susan Weaver is transferring properties from trusts to her pet attorney’s clients, without service on the trustee with notice of the action.
In my case, I allege she colluded with the court reporter and attorney William Zac White to falsify the record. Judge Weaver and Jana Perry used your tax dollars to evade playing the tapes that were inaccurately transcribed.
I have spent countless hours and thousands of dollars trying to retain an attorney who is brave enough to argue to the Court of Appeals that the record should be settled by playing the tapes. None can be found.
Perhaps the lawyers are foreshadowing the response from the Court of Appeals…anger at me for speaking the truth.
Is there no one in power who wants to preserve our fine system of law and order? The JDDC? The Arkansas Attorney General? The FBI?
So far, mine is a lonely small voice. Can you hear me? “The King has no clothes.”
Your Tax Dollars at Work. Not! Judge Susan Weaver’s Salary Unconstitutional?
The Arkansas Constitution Amendment 15 specifies the monthly salary “for Judge of the Circuit Courts and Chancellors, each, the sum of $3,600.00.”
That does not seem to me to be enough pay for a good judge. It is far too much for a bad judge. A bad judge should be fired!
I think Judge Susan Weaver should be fired.
But according to a website called Transparency.Arkansas.Gov Judge Susan Weaver pulls in $180,129.36 per year.
Yowza! That is a whole lot of money for a crooked judge who expressed that she does not know or understand exceptions to the hearsay rule, does not allow defendants to testify, and allows her favored attorneys to violate ARCP Rule 4(i), amongst a long list of other irregularities.
Judge Weaver recently ordered default damages that returned title to a property worth at least $200,000 from my living trust to a convicted felon who I allege used my money to buy the property in his name in the first place. I was named as a joint defendant and dismissed with prejudice, which means I was not guilty of slandering title, trespassing or any other claim against me as an individual.
A big portion of the proceeds of sale of the property will go to paying Plaintiff’s Attorney William Zac White. I suspect a portion will also be paid to Judge Weaver as a tip for service to Mr. White.
Aside from whether Judge Weaver collects any money as a bribe, why is she paid more than the Constitution specifies? This is not a rhetorical question.
Please explain in the comments or by email to bohemian_books@yahoo.com how official judges’ salaries exceed the amount specified in the constitution. Requests for anonymity will be honored.
Why Judge Weaver Keeps the Record Under Wraps: The New Nixon & Weavergate
There is a reason court reporters make transcripts of hearings.
An audio recording is a better record. But electronic records deteriorate faster than paper and become obsolete. Now that “paper” records are stored electronically by the courts, that reason is negated.
It is quicker to read than to listen. An hour-long hearing transcript takes about 20 minutes to read.
It is easier to “rewind” print than electronic communications.
The advantages to using the audio recording for a court record is that it is more accurate. It is harder to edit than a transcript.
Hopefully court reporters are always honest. But they are not.
I allege that Jana Perry in Searcy County Arkansas purposefully made two inaccurate transcripts in a case in which I was a defendant.
I asked to have the tape played back. Ms. Perry refused.
I asked Judge Susan Weaver to “settle the record” by playing back the tape in open court. She refused.
I made a Freedom of Information Act request for the recording. Judge Weaver refused to approve the FOIA request.
I need the record of the case as evidence in another case. So, I sent a subpoena to Jana Perry.
An assistant Attorney General wrote a motion to quash the subpoena for Ms. Perry. Your tax dollars at work. Ironically, one reason he gave was that producing a copy of the audio recording was a burden. How much more of a burden was writing the motion, the response and having the court read the response?
Why so secretive? You decide.
A. Judge Weaver does not like the sound of her own voice.
B. Jana Perry wants to drum up business, and there is not as much mark-up when emailing the audio. (This is one reason the AG gave in the motion to quash.)
C. Judge Weaver and Jana Perry are guilty of honest services fraud for purposefully making a false record of a case in which Judge Weaver transferred title to a property worth at least $200K from an unrepresented trust to a convicted felon and his attorney.
D. B & C.
***********************
Put your answer in the comments. Thanks.
Everyone is a Critic: William Zac White Included
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Laura Lynn
Cc:Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Sat, Apr 16 at 12:34 PM
I do not want your courtesy. I have blocked you from all means of communication with my office. Send me a summons or just go away. Put that on your worthless blog. Last warning.
***************************************
That was his last “last warning”. Here are a few more culled from various emails he sent to me. Cut and pasted. The errors are the esteemed attorney’s. Bold added.
***************************************
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Laura Lynn
Cc:Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Fri, Mar 18 at 10:07 AM
All of them. Consider this your only cease abs desist warning. I like reading how other courts around the country have admonished your behavior. Already dealing with the office of professional conduct. I have asked to file a complaint against you.
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Tammy Weaver
Cc:Laura Lynn,Jana Perry,Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Thu, Mar 31 at 7:52 AM
Ms Hammett,
I have instructed you not to communicate with me or my office staff since you are no longer a party to this action and there is no legitimate reason for you to contact us. I have had enough of your threats. I do not care who you email but do not include me or my staff members. I am done with you and trying to move on civilly. This is your last warning.
William Z. White <wzwhite@wzwhite.com>
To:Laura Lynn
Cc:Brooke Hipp,Chris Butts
Sat, Apr 16 at 12:29 PM
I will do no such thing. You made the record a convoluted and ridiculous. I will not agree to help you or your “case” in anyway. I will never meet you in person unless I subpoena you and your husband for depositions or your criminal contempt trial. Once again do not contact my office. As I mentioned I will be filing a police report for your incessant harassment. Do yourself a favor and go away before I take an actual interest in putting you in jail. You lost deal with it. Next time you should not try to evade child support with your hair brained schemes. Last warning. Do not contact my office again.
***************************************************
About the use of a trust to protect assets, I found an article on the Experian website. Here is a quote from work by Erica Sandberg:
“With a revocable trust, your assets will not be protected from creditors looking to sue. That’s because you maintain ownership of the trust while you’re alive. Therefore if you lose a lawsuit and a judgment is awarded to the creditor, the trust may have to be closed and the money handed over.”
I am not an attorney. William White is an attorney.
If he dismissed the trust and won against me, he could probably have reached the assets in the trust. (That may be why Willy didn’t issue a summons directed to the trust for six months.) But he dismissed me and won against the trust by default (because no attorney would take the case and jeopardize his career with the wrath of Judge Weaver).
Now the Court of Appeals will need to decide if the trustee, beneficiary and settlor of a living trust is allowed to present testimony and evidence at a hearing on damages when the trust is not represented but the trustee is a joint defendant, is present and prepared to present evidence.
Justice would be served if Judge Weaver had imputed my defenses on the defaulting joint defendant, especially because I owned the property held in the trust.
But why talk about Justice and Judge Weaver in the same sentence?
Who Owns Arkansas?
It is election season. “Vote for Me” signs line the roadways. Stacks of circulars clutter the mail.
There is one “quality” claimed by a few of the candidates. They brag on how many generations have lived in Arkansas.
Being from the lineage of those who displaced the native Americans seems to be a badge of honor.
Attorney William Z. White of Heber Springs brags on his website that “Zac is a sixth-generation Arkansan”.
Judge Susan Weaver’s family goes way back in the state also.
I am a transplant to Arkansas. I am a native Californian and understand why people who already live in an area would want to put up a wall.
But on the same advertisements for political office, the candidates claim to want to stimulate the economy and attract businesses. There is an upside to population growth.
My experience is that I moved to Arkansas with enough assets to retire modestly. Always hoping to contribute, I helped renovate a community building at a cost to me of $45,000 and I fixed up an empty house in Saline County. Yet, seven years after moving to Arkansas, I am close to broke.
A big percentage of my losses were COVID related. But the remainder of losses are due to a corrupt Arkansas judge.
I am the beneficiary of a trust that held a property worth somewhere between $199,000 and $350,000. I planned to sell that property and split the sales price 50/50 with my former partner. Judge Weaver transferred title of that property to my former partner, one of William Zac White’s clients, with a huge chunk of it going to attorney fees, of course.
Judge Weaver would not allow me to testify about how my former partner defrauded me and allegedly stole money from me, swore under penalty of perjury he would reimburse me for the hundreds of thousands of dollars of capital he took from me, and convinced me to put title of the property into a trust rather than my own name.
Judge Weaver said that speaking the truth about the situation would be the unauthorized practice of law. I was a co-defendant in the lawsuit filed by William White, but he said he intended to dismiss me, and Judge Weaver used that as an excuse to muzzle me.
Who owns Arkansas? Not the newcomer.
Do not bring your life savings to Arkansas with the intent to retire. The clans that have been here for generations will make protecting your assets a full-time job or drain your bank accounts through attorney fees. It’s a stinking shame.
Submit Your Nominations for Dumbest Idea Ever Concocted by An Attorney
Here is my nomination. Try to beat it.
Attorney William Z. White filed an untenable lawsuit against me on behalf of the man who defrauded me of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The fraudster client convinced me he thought of me as his “wife in the eyes of God” and we would spend the rest of our lives together. He then borrowed over $260,000 with no intention of paying it back.
I began to realize the fraud. I said I was breaking up and not giving the fraudster any more money.
He convinced me to stay with him by signing a contract that said if we broke up we would split our assets, other than my share in a family owned company, 50/50.
After the fraudster was caught buying the services of hookers, I threatened to break up again.
Fraudster convinced me to stay by transferring title in the property bought with my money to a trust. I was the trustee and the beneficiary. To give the fraudster some protection, we wrote a mortgage for the amount we paid for the property. I even agreed to an interest payment that was legal usury.
After the fraudster nearly killed himself in a drunk driving accident, I broke up. I didn’t want to be collateral damage and I was not willing to put up with the sexual infidelity.
Step in Willy White.
(Well, an attorney who is now a judge, Billy Jack Gibson, represented the fraudster at first. He did not file a lawsuit for the fraudster.)
White filed a suit in 2018, naming me as an individual and the trust. He used the character chain “and/or” for all the claims against the trust.
The suit was dismissed in 2020 for lack of prosecution.
Then White came up with a plan. He used a similar plan on a case where he represented Richard Gawenis. It didn’t work out well for them in the Gawenis case, but try, try again.
White refiled the case against me and didn’t serve a summons. He was going to ask Judge Weaver to give him default judgment.
Judge Susan Weaver gave default judgment to revoke a trust on the Gawenis case even though the trustee of the trust involved was not served summons or notified. If that was an isolated case, I’d say it was due to Judge Weaver being less than the brightest bulb. Since Weaver was already made aware of the error by a licensed attorney, and she set aside the order, it looks like Weaver was colluding with White when he tried the same act a second time.
On my case, Attorney White didn’t even issue a summons for the trust defendant.
Unfortunately for the conspirators, I noticed the second lawsuit on Court Connect on my own.
I fought Weaver and White for about 9 months. It was obvious they were colluding.
Finally, White sent me a couple boxes of documents I requested through discovery. One paper was a letter written by the fraudster and signed that described the plan to defraud me more.
I presented the letter to Judge Weaver.
Here is the dumbest idea I’ve heard of concocted by an attorney. Since the attorney couldn’t beat me in court, even with an unethical and/or moronic judge, he dismissed me with prejudice.
I am not allowed to represent the trust, because that would be considered the unauthorized practice of law.
There is not a single attorney amongst the dozens I asked who would represent the trust. The honest ones said it was for fear of retaliation by Judge Weaver. The others said they were too busy to earn $300 per hour from me.
So, the trust lost by default.
Willy White looked like Pinocchio when the wooden headed boy got applause from his first performance. Pinocchio was clapping and laughing with the crowd, so proud of himself.
Here is where the plan fell apart.
A dismissal with prejudice means it was on the merits. Since the non-defaulting party prevailed on the merits, the joint defaulting defendant should also be dismissed. There was no merit to the joint claims.
Since the claim was that I and the trust clouded title to the fraudster’s property and trespassed on it, and I “proved” that I did not trespass or cloud title, the statements in the complaint that I and the trust did anything must be deemed false. The trust must also be dismissed. It would be a second dismissal, so it would be with prejudice.
Judge Weaver acted like she is not aware that default judgment is not mandatory and that the judge should use discretion when handing out default damages.
Judge Weaver knew there was an avalanche of evidence against the fraudster. But it is so much fun for Judge Weaver to “play” with other people’s trust funds. (She was quoted by the Democrat Gazette as saying so.) Judge Weaver gave the property that may be worth $350,000 to the fraudster, and then said she approved the transfer of the asset to an irrevocable trust designed by William White.
To make it look like there was some reason for giving the property to the fraudster, Judge Weaver wrote in her order that I did all the bad things that were claimed in the complaint, even though I was dismissed on the merits.
Hopefully the Court of Appeals will reverse the erroneous ruling and dismiss the case against all defendants. Then I won’t need to file a malicious prosecution and fraudulent transfer case to recover the property.
The dumbest idea I have heard of concocted by an attorney is to dismiss one joint defendant who has his him on the ropes with the expectation that the defaulting joint defendant will lose on the exact same claims, and the order will hold up on appeal.
Your Tax Dollars “at Work for You”. Not!
Welcome to Weavergate.
I am not an attorney. Nothing here should be taken as legal advice.
Because I am not allowed to practice law and there are a few judges and lawyers who would like any excuse to incarcerate me, I usually write about my own cases. I am free to discuss my experiences and how I responded in certain situations but must tip toe lightly around other people’s cases.
If you have followed my blog, you have read about two of my cases, Pietrczak and PRA.
The two cases collided, like particles in the Big Bang.
Pietrczak is about a man who conned me into believing he was in love with me in order to defraud me of hundreds of thousands of dollars. After making off like a bandit, he filed a lawsuit against me in an attempt to take many times the initial fraud. A lawyer named William White helped him to win the lawsuit by default against a trust that I am a trustee of, even though the joint claims against me were dismissed on the merits. It appeared to me and many attorneys I asked to represent the trust that the judge on the case is colluding with Pietrczak and White. No lawyer would represent the trust out of self-preservation.
One appearance of bias is that the judge, Susan Weaver, insists that she made an erroneous ruling orally, and that I took more than the allotted 10 days plus weekends to object, so the order became a written order with no opportunity to respond in writing.
I was representing myself in the hearing and know what was said. Judge Weaver said that she spoke to the “AOC” during a short break and they told her Pietrczak’s oral motion for an extension of time to serve summons on the trust had to be in writing and I had to be given an opportunity to respond in writing.
The official court reporter’s transcript followed the fiction created by Judge Weaver and Attorney White.
I guess the conspirators thought that I would be scared of disputing Judge Weaver’s lies, like so many of the lawyers in this neck of the woods and let her transfer property that should belong to me to her friends and family.
Judge Weaver does scare me. But I am a champion poker player. There is a fun saying in poker. “A big pair beats everything.” Regardless of the spoken threat that Judge Weaver will incarcerate me and give all the money I ever earn or inherit to Pietrczak and White, I called her “bluff”. She gets away with a lot of stuff, but I don’t think she will get away this time.
So far, I have limited the amount of impermissible transfer to the value of a 40-acre parcel with a cabin, because that is the only assets that ever got put into the trust.
The PRA case is about a debt buyer that made incessant phone calls to me in an attempt to collect an alleged debt. At first, I thought I had no debt. Not to Portfolio Recovery Associates and not to anyone.
Recently, PRA produced what it claims is a statement from the credit card company that shows a debt incurred in 2010. What a coincidence! 2010 is when Pietrczak started his con on me. It is feasible that Pietrczak committed identity theft by using my credit card. Since I was not using the card, having gone to debit cards and cash, I would not look out for a bill. If a bill was sent to an address that we lived at, it could easily by intercepted by Pietrczak.
I think any juror who hears the recordings of the Pietrczak hearings and sees how inaccurate the transcript is will believe that Pietrczak had special favor from the Court. Collusion with the court coupled with Pietrczak’s criminal record, handwritten notes and sworn testimony in which he contradicts himself, is evidence of the plausibility that Pietrczak used one or more of my old credit cards. (All the while, I paid off thousands of dollars of debt for Pietrczak willingly, on the promise that he would reimburse me when he could.)
I want to play the recordings of the Pietrczak hearings to the jurors in the Portfolio Recovery Associates case. I doubt the court reporter will transcribe the dialogue when Mr. White leaned toward me and said “bitch” loud enough for me and the court observers to hear. The written transcript, even if accurate, cannot capture Judge Weaver’s tone of voice, snarky to me and sweet to Mr. White and Mr. Pietrczak.
I had a subpoena served on the court reporter.
Below is her brief in support of a motion to quash the subpoena. It is written on her behalf by the Office of Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge. It seems to me to be in violation of Civil Rules of Procedure Rule 1, Rule 11 and is a big waste of taxpayer dollars.
If the deputy attorney general actually made a reasonable inquiry into the facts of the case, he would encourage his “client” to email the files of the recordings. The AG would learn from the fiasco surrounding the oval office tapes that Nixon tried to keep from the public.
I won’t vote for Leslie Rutledge for Lt. Governor. She says what I want to hear, but in practice she defends government employees with facts and law that she knows or should know are not true. She may eventually file charges against Judge Weaver and court reporter Jana Perry for some kind of honest services fraud*, but to date, I have no reason to think Attorney General Rutledge pursues law and order when it comes to her cronies and the entrenched power elite.
*Assistant Attorney General Middlebrooks provided me with this information: “While the Attorney General does represent the state in criminal cases on appeal, it does not, to the best of my knowledge, do any prosecution at the trial level.”
I have contacted the FBI, Searcy County Sheriff, the Court Reporters Board and filed a civil rights action that was supposed to be read by Federal District Judge Wilson and the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals. I have yet to have anyone act even mildly interested in investigating what I believe is a serious infraction of the law.
By creating inaccurate records, the court personnel involved are making law obsolete in Arkansas. Worse, each and every citizen is subject to the whims of a greedy judge. Please do not vote for Susan Weaver for any office in Arkansas. She belongs in prison, not public office.
A Higher Law 