Monster Alan Friedenthal is Dead!
Thank you to my sister victim of the corrupt family law system in Los Angeles, California, for sending an obituary from the August 18, 2020 death of Alan Friedenthal.
It was interesting to read the glowing tribute by the Met-News, a rag in the Democrat run state that caters to the legal community.
What do you say about an alleged pedophile who destroyed children’s lives and collected lots of money doing it?
The Met-News steered clear of Alan’s history in the family law court, claiming he worked primarily in dependency and delinquency cases.
Maybe they wanted people to believe his cases were sealed, so as not to read through them.
Maybe it sounded better to say Alan separated children from their parents in dependency and juvenile court, where they would have legal counsel protecting the families’ rights. In “family law” the unethical commissioner was able to violate parental rights of anyone who did not have enough money to pay an attorney, or who was outlawyered by Friedenthal’s cronies.
The Met-News did apologetics for the buffoon ex-commissioner concerning the “severe public admonishment” the monster received for making impermissible rulings from the bench against five families. The Met-News discounted the disciplinary action taken by the Commission on Judicial Performance and the California Supreme Court by claiming one of the mothers who was separated from her child completely by Alan Friedenthal made antisemitic comments to the secular Jewish judicial officer.
According to a story by Fox News that featured this writer’s work exposing Alan Friedenthal, there were hundreds of people who complained about the court commissioner.
One of my sources who worked in law enforcement said the rotund man was investigated for inappropriate sexualized conduct toward one of the boys he separated from the child’s biological mother.
My faith is challenged to the limits when I write these words that I know I should say with sincerity:
May he rest in peace.
Will Rosie O’Donnell Support Michele Rounds with “Child Support”?
Department of Child Support Services, DCSS, was originally put in place to collect back child support for children who were receiving government aid. The government in essence had loaned money to help poor families who were unable to collect court ordered child support.
With matching Title IV-D funds being split between the states depending on how much child support is collected by DCSS, the child support agency workers, highly paid attorneys, are becoming more aggressive in getting their piece of the pie.
California is a wealthy state and opportunities abound to separate children from parents, then charge the non-custodial parent to have the other parent, or even grandparent, keep the kids.
If you have not been through the system, you probably think I am crazy. I have been seen by several psychiatrists, and the only diagnosis given is depressed and anxious. Depressed and anxious is not crazy.
Several parents who were estranged from their children by an apparently corrupt court have shared their case files and personal time with me. They are articulate, don’t use drugs or alcohol when around me, have advanced degrees in psychology and teaching, have been bank vice presidents and most are faithful Christians.
According to stories in gossip media, Rosie O’Donnell’s estranged wife, Michelle Rounds is claiming Rosie has a drug and alcohol problem that makes parenting impossible.
Okay, so Michelle meets this other lesbian woman who has four children already, three adopted and one by artificial insemination. She falls in love, signs a pre-nup and marries. Then she specifically goes out and adopts a fifth child.
Was Rosie abstaining from drugs and alcohol all this time? What did Michelle Rounds write on her adoption application about her spouse?
I know a wonderful woman, a devout Christian, the director of probation for a large county, who was denied adoption because she was single. The paper work is pretty stringent. So, what did Michelle Rounds write, probably under penalty of perjury, about Rosie O’Donnell?
It seems more likely to me that Ms. Rounds is a gold-digger and will use the legal system and an innocent child to get a big pay-day. The sick thing is, the judges and DCSS will be right there, hands out, ready to grab as much money as they can from one mother of this child, to give to the other mother and pay their own salaries.
Is that really in the “best interest of the child”?
A Higher Law 