Feeling Funky, But Want to KIT
Sorry my posts are few and far between. Is this what the elder years are like? One ailment after another?
My current malady is COVID. The doctor diagnosing me did not seem too concerned. COVID is not the Russian Roulette it was in 2020 or when the delta variant hit.
There were moments in the past few days when I would rather be dead than handle the pain, but modern medicine is wonderous. Pop a pill and drift off into a comfortable sleep.
Unfortunately, law has not kept up with medicine. Judges usually hold non-attorney, self-represented litigants to the same standards as a team of high paid lawyers. I remember feeling like I do now, and Judge Susan K. Weaver of Searcy County Circuit Court denied my request to postpone an in-person hearing that entailed three hours of driving for me.
Funky as I feel, I finished a petition for writ of mandate today to cause Judge Weaver to play the recording of court hearings that were deliberately falsified in the transcripts.
Here it is.
Do You Play With Cheaters?
I finally have a good excuse to write about my passion: Poker.
What does poker have to do with court corruption?
Simple. Sometimes players cheat at poker. Sometimes litigants cheat at litigation.
Sadly, sometimes “the house” (the court) is complicit.
For instance, an attorney named William Z. White maliciously filed a lawsuit against me to benefit my former romantic and business partner, Micheal “Mike” Pietrczak. (Micheal is the correct spelling of his name, though even the Federal Court got it wrong when he was convicted of using a false i.d. at the U.S.-Mexico border.)
Mike was committing fraud on me. Mr. White had a suicide note written by Mike to his father that described the fraud. He proceeded against me anyhow, claiming I was defrauding Mike.
Eventually the suit against me was dismissed twice. The second dismissal was voluntary, instigated by Mr. White after the suicide note was sent to me in a production of documents. The big box of documents looked like someone peed and pooped on some papers, then shuffled them together. I put on gloves and looked through each page.
Still, I had a common defense doctrine co-defendant, a trust. I was trustee and beneficiary of that trust. I was not allowed to advocate for the trust because I am not licensed to practice law.
Judge Susan Kaye Weaver granted default judgment against the trust. She transferred all the assets I intended to use for retirement to a brand-new trust that will fund Mike Pietrczak’s drug and alcohol abuse and the trauma’s he causes to his own body. He was paralyzed in one of his accidents, after I broke up with him. (Mike told me his medical bills cost the taxpayers millions of dollars. His lawsuit probably cost the taxpayers quite a bit more.)
Early in the second case Mr. White filed in the Searcy County Arkansas Circuit Court, 65-CV-21-20, the Court Reporter Jana Perry deliberately falsified what was said in a hearing. Even though I threw a tizzy, filing motions to settle, civil rights lawsuits and complaints to administrative agencies, Ms. Perry repeated her dishonest services by falsifying a second hearing transcript.
You may notice that I am not using my usual cautionary words, such as “allegedly”. That is because truth is a defense against defamation, and I know what I am saying is true. If any of the conspirators who cheated at court sues me for defamation, the tape of the hearing will be exculpatory evidence and Ms. Perry will be required to play it in open court with a copy of the transcript on a screen for all to see. (Unless that court cheats, too.)
I have begged Judge Weaver and the Justices at the Court of Appeals to play the tape, with no success.
My 1983 suit in Federal District Court against Ms. Perry, Judge Weaver and Mr. White was dismissed without reaching discovery by Judge Billy Roy Wilson. (I call him “Billy Bob”.)
I was going to use the tape as evidence in an FDCPA case against Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. But Judge Rudofsky is leaning towards ending that case before allowing Ms. Perry to comply with my subpoena.
Judge Weaver and her good ol’ peeps are definitely cheating.
Judge Rudofsky, if he is cheating, is much smarter and more subtle. He allows for Portfolio Recovery to file everything it wants under seal, even forms it has published to the public numerous times in other cases, with just different data. They are able to avoid scrutiny.
This is where law feels like a poker game. There is collusion going on. meaning two or more people at the table are working together. Collusion is a form of cheating.
For instance, I have watched a couple sitting next to each other. The woman was on the man’s right. Every time she played a hand, so did he. This is called “protection”. It is subtle and may happen unintentionally, as well.
I know that when I am at a table with my son, I am more likely to call a hand he is in. I know that if I lose, the money will probably go to him. He wins more hands than he loses. I would give him all my money and my right arm if he needed it. So, what’s an extra ten bucks? I should learn from the experience, because every time I play at a table with my son, I come out ahead. I should probably loosen up even when my son is not at the table.
The difference between how I play when my son is there and how the couple was playing is that I don’t play my crap hands when my son is next to me. I fold 7-2 off suit. I noticed the couple’s gambit when all other players folded and both had to expose their hands for the show down. They both had Jack-shit. (Not literally a jack and a shitty kicker. That is a colloquialism for “nothing” that was taken from poker, because a jack with a low off suit kicker is not likely to be a winning hand.) The woman had a good opening hand, but the flop made it unplayable. The man had nothing to start and nothing to finish. They both bluffed the other players out together. After that hand I paid close attention to their pattern. It defied statistical probability, so I got up and found other kids to play with.
I do not play with cheaters. Collusion is cheating.
My son, on the other hand, will. He once told me there were cheaters at the game he played the night before. I asked why he continued to play. He said “if they have to cheat to win, they are not good players. They might win a few hands against me, but I will win more. Eventually I will leave with their money.”
I don’t think my son’s theory works at law.
I took the case Billy Bob presided over to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and those Justices dismissed my appeal summarily. That means they did not allow me to write a brief. I didn’t know the appellate court could do that. Maybe I should have brought the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I made two bids on a case in California to go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Both petitions for writ of cert were denied. That is not unusual. A miniscule percentage of petitions are granted for discretionary review by SCOTUS.
On the California case I was able to have a judge admonished for his unethical behavior. That was a slap on the wrist. I believe the presiding family law judge took early retirement in part because of my complaints about her. But there was no dramatic improvement in the court.
It is too easy for judges to show a bias toward favored litigants or to outright cheat for them. They can easily collude.
Unlike at a poker game, the players are not allowed to just get up and leave without leaving all their money on the table.
Since the unethical judges will eventually transfer all the marks’ money to the opponent, is it wiser for the mark to hand her money over? I don’t think so.
Because unlike at poker, the opponent is allowed to force the mark to bring more money to the table, by filing another bullshit lawsuit or getting an impermissible order for attorney fees. Portfolio Recovery Associates and the William Zac Whites of the world make billions of dollars a year doing just that.
The Problem is…No One Gives a Fuck
No, I’m not drunk. Just pissed.
Do you know how brave a person needs to be to say, “um, excuse me Your Honor, but you just lied”?
She would need to be as brave as me.
Or stupid.
I went to the Court of Appeals here in the Great State of Arkansas and asked the inaptly named Justices to let the People hear the tape of a hearing that was fictionalized by court reporter Jana Perry in a transcript that is one part imagination and two parts greed.
They said “no”.
Not one of them was brave or stupid enough to put his name on the order, either. It was rubber stamped by the clerk.
I give up. For tonight. That doesn’t mean you need to.
Obstruction of Justice?
obstruction of justice (1854) Interference with the orderly administration of law and justice, as by giving false information to or withholding evidence from a police officer or prosecutor, or by harming or intimidating a witness or juror. • Obstruction of justice is a crime in most jurisdictions. — Also termed obstructing justice; obstructing public justice. See perverting the course of justice.
“The goal, — to proscribe every wilful act of corruption, intimidation or force which tends in any way to distort or impede the administration of law either civil or criminal — has been very largely attained, partly by aid of legislation. And any punishable misdeed of such a nature which is not recognized as a distinct crime, is usually called ‘obstruction of justice,’ or ‘obstructing justice,’ — a common-law misdemeanor.” Rollin M. Perkins & Ronald N. Boyce, Criminal Law 552 (3d ed. 1982).
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019)
Does this apply when a court reporter, such as Jana Perry of the Circuit Courts in Arkansas, purposefully makes an inaccurate transcription of a hearing?
What if a judge, such as Susan Kaye Weaver, threatens to refer a person for prosecution of the crime of the unauthorized practice of law if that person argues or testifies on her own behalf, just because the testimony will also benefit another entity?
And what about if an attorney, such as William Zac White of Heber Springs is colluding with the judge and court reporter and threatens to report their victim to a sympathetic good ol’ boy sheriff on trumped up charges?
I prefer the term for Obstruction of Justice used in other countries.
Perverting the Course of Justice.
Animal Farm and Judge Susan Weaver of Arkansas
Remember when the pigs altered the bill of rights each night while the other animals slept?
Welcome to Searcy County Arkansas with its own Animal Farm ruled over by piggies like Susan Weaver.
I have complained to sheriff deputies in Searcy County, where Judge Weaver presides. I complained in Faulkner County, my home and another realm ruled over by Weaver.
Today, I complained to a sheriff in Hot Springs County, where one of Weaver’s cohorts resides.
I allege that Judge Weaver, Court Reporter Jana Perry and Attorney William White colluded to transfer a 40-acre property with a house to one of White’s clients and then in an allegedly fraudulent transfer to an irrevocable trust. Ms. Perry fictionalized the dialogue in two or three hearings.
I was in the hearings and had others present who agree that the transcripts do not give an accurate account of what was said.
The problem is, Judge Weaver and Jana Perry control the audio recordings, the best evidence of what happened, and neither one will let them be heard.
Back on the farm, all three sheriff deputies I spoke with said they cannot do anything about it.
The guy today went so far as to say that even if he heard a judge in Arkansas lie from the bench, he could not do anything about it.
The Court has free rein to alter the record in any way she wants.
“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” – the Pigs via George Orwell
Attorney Faces Discipline Over Sexist Slur
Thank you to attorney Robin Shea of Constangy Brooks Smith and Prophete LLP for her post on Lexology.
She recounts how an attorney lost in a hearing and then, when leaving, turned to the two female opposing counsel and said: “See you next Tuesday. See you next Tuesday.”
The comment seemed innocuous enough. Unless a person was hip to the slang meaning of “see you next Tuesday.” If you are not sensitive, you can read the meaning here.
Spoiler alert: It is a four-letter word that starts with C-U.
The judge presiding at that hearing, after being alerted to the meaning of the sentence, issued this order.
He said, in part:
“An attorney is an ‘officer of the court’ who, by virtue of his or her professional position, undertakes certain ‘special duties … to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process.’ ” (F.T.C. v. Network Services Depot, Inc. (9th Cir. 2010) 617 F.3d 1127, 1143.) In other words,” ‘[l]t is vital to the integrity of our adversary legal process that attorneys strive to maintain the highest standards of ethics, civility, and professionalism in the practice of law.’ (People v. Chong (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 232, 243, 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 198.) Indeed, unwarranted personal attacks on the character or motives of the opposing party, counsel, or witnesses are inappropriate and may constitute misconduct. (Id. at p. 245, 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 198; see also Stone v. Foster (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 334, 355, 164 Cal.Rptr. 901.)” (In re S.C. (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 396, 412.) “When, during the course of trial, an attorney violates his or her obligations as an officer of the court, the judge may control the proceedings and protect the integrity of the court and the judicial process by reprimanding the attorney.” (Chong, supra, 76 Cal.App.4th at 243-244.)”
The judge referred the unprofessional conduct to the State Bar for disciplinary action.
Too bad Arkansas Circuit Court Judge Susan Kaye Weaver does not defend women against similar conduct.
On March 17, 2022, during the hearing in which attorney William Z. White admitted a non-suit against me was in order, he leaned toward me and said “Bitch” loudly.
Court Reporter Jana Perry decided not to include that sexist slur in the transcript of the hearing.
Judge Weaver completely ignored the slur. She was too busy transferring property that should have belonged to me to Mr. White and his client.
Like: “We’re going to dismiss you, Bitch, so shut your mouth. You are not allowed to speak the truth on behalf of your trust.” Oh, and see you next Tuesday.
Arkansas Judge Susan Weaver Throws a Tantrum
Judge Susan Weaver gave a 40-acre property and house that was held in a trust to a man, even after seeing a handwritten note signed by the man that described how he was committing fraud on the trustee of that trust.
I am the trustee. I was also named in the lawsuit as an individual. Because I was 100% right and the fraudster was 100% wrong, he dropped the suit against me.
The judge and fraudster’s lawyer thought they found a clever loophole.
A trustee cannot defend herself in court, unless she is a licensed attorney.
I told Judge Weaver that I had a heck of a time finding an attorney who would represent the trust, due to the appearance of bias by the court. I literally had an attorney refuse $300 per hour to represent the trust because if he did, he would never win a case in front of Judge Weaver again.
Then, after Weaver found against the unrepresented trust by default, I found an attorney who would at least file a notice of appeal for the trust. His name is Dustin Duke. He is not quite Oskar Schindler, but he does seem to like to protect the underrepresented.
Anyhow, Mr. Duke got me through to the Court of Appeals. Then he wrote a motion to withdraw as counsel.
Neither fraudster’s attorney nor I filed an opposition. But Judge Weaver did not grant Mr. Duke’s motion.
He filed an amended motion to withdraw. Again, silence from the judge.
Then, I filed the record in the COA. I followed up with a tell all motion to settle the record that describes how Judge Susan Weaver and Court Reporter Jana Perry fictionalized hearings and then kept the audio of the hearings under wraps.
All of a sudden Judge Weaver decided to grant Dustin Duke’s motion to withdraw, which would leave the trust unrepresented again.
The problem for Suzy is that she does not know law.
I am not an attorney. This is not legal advice. But I think that it is illegal to smoke weed in Arkansas without a medical marijuana card and I think jurisdiction, the authority of a court to act, passes from the trial court to the appellate court when the record on appeal is filed.
I think Judge Weaver’s order was two days late and amounts to nothing more than a tantrum by a spoiled child who found out she is going to have to return the toy she stole from a kid on the playground.
The sad part is, judges usually can’t be held liable for making bad calls, even if they purposefully do the wrong thing. But they can be incarcerated. Doesn’t happen often, but we can hope.
Clerk and Court Reporter Give Fraudster More Time to Hide the Money
My former romantic and business partner admitted, through his attorney, to advertising on Craigslist for a blue-eyed blond less than half his age. This while we were living together, and he was spending my passive income as if it was his own.
The lecherous middle-aged man also wrote and signed a letter telling his dad, Walter Pietrczak of Malvern Arkansas that he was collecting thousands of dollars from me under the pretense that we were splitting the property we accumulated while together in half. He warned his dad to keep it a secret from me until I paid the full amount, and then have attorney William Zac White file a lawsuit that said I defrauded him and did not pay the mortgage.
Despite a judge, Susan Kay Weaver, colluding with Mr. White and the Court Reporter Jana Perry, I was able to get dismissed from the case as an individual.
But I was not allowed to represent a trust that held the property, because I am not a licensed attorney.
I could find no attorney brave enough to represent the trust. With the Court’s obvious animosity toward me, it would be professional suicide to be associated with me.
Judge Susan Weaver denied my motion to intervene on behalf of the trust.
The judge gagged me (figuratively), then held a kangaroo court and awarded the entire property and then some to my former partner, a felon and drug addict. She also approved a fraudulent transfer of the property into an irrevocable trust, making it that much harder for me to recover the property after appeal.
Judge Weaver signed an order that found me guilty of all kinds of things as an individual and seized my property interests without any opportunity to defend myself.
Step in the Searcy County Clerk, Debbie Loggins. Ms. Loggins recorded the judgment under my name as an individual. (She said she corrected that on Friday, July 15, after I discovered the error.)
I filed a notice of appeal and was waiting for the record to be produced by the clerk and court reporter. I had 90 days to get the record filed. That would be today, July 19, 2022.
While I waited, the Pietrczaks sold the property for almost $200K and transferred the money into the irrevocable trust. The buyer’s title insurance company will probably blame their mistake on Clerk Loggins.
The transcript was emailed to me at 9:56 P.M. on Sunday, July 17th.
The clerk realized I was allowed to pay electronically but chose to drive an hour and a half each way to pick up my check and drop off the record on Monday evening, July 18th.
The Court of Appeals received my filing in the wee hours of July 19th.
I had prepared a petition for writ of certiorari to compel the clerk and court reporter to do their jobs. It is not necessary to file that now. It wasn’t wasted effort, as it may be what convinced the two conniving government employees to do their jobs.
Since I put in the effort, I will post the petition here. Sorry about the formatting. A download of the properly formatted PDF is available at the bottom.
IN THE ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
RURAL REVIVAL LIVING TRUST; AND LAURA LYNN HAMMETT APPELLANTS
v. CASE No. 65CV-21-20
MICHEAL PIETRCZAK APPELLEE
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO COMPLETE THE RECORD
COMES NOW, on this 18th day of July, Laura Lynn Hammett, Appellant, pro se, and for this Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Complete the Record and in support thereof states, pursuant to cited authorities and facts attested to by affidavit filed concurrently:
- This motion is filed pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 3-5(a). Rule 3-5(a) permits this Court to authorize its Clerk to issue a writ of certiorari to a circuit court clerk or court reporter to prepare the record on appeal.
- Attached to this motion is a partial record. The partial record consists of certified copies of documents from the Searcy County Circuit Court Clerks file in the above-styled case. These certified documents requested on July 15, 2022 were “all orders in the case and the motion for extension of time filed June 17th, 2022”. The order of July 13, 2022 denying an extension of time to file the record was not included in the packet by the clerk and so an uncertified copy printed from the Court Connect site was included.
- That on April 20, 2022, Appellant timely filed a Notice of Appeal and Declaration of Record to Supreme Court of Arkansas with the Searcy County Circuit Court.
- The appellant, in compliance with Rule 6(b), has timely ordered the stenographically reported material from the court reporter and made any financial arrangements required for its preparation.
- The Record on Appeal shall be filed with the Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and docketed therein within 90 days, July 19, 2022. (Ark. R. App. P. 5(a)
- If the record will not be prepared timely, the appellant must give the other parties an opportunity to object to an extension either in writing or by hearing. (Ark. R. App. P. 5(b)(1)(C))
- If the motion is made in writing, the opposing party has 10 days plus weekends to respond. (Ark. R. Civ. P. 6)
- Therefore, in order to ensure time for an opposition and for the Court to decide a motion for extension of time, Appellant filed a motion on June 17, 2022 despite the hope and assurances that the Court Reporter and Clerk will complete their tasks timely.
- This order requested was to be contingent on the need for an extension of time for the court reporter to include the stenographically reported material in the record on appeal or for the circuit clerk to compile the record and would extend the time allowed until the complete record is compiled and Appellant notified of such plus three business days, but no more than seven months.
- Appellee did not oppose the motion. He made no response.
- The Trial Court denied the motion for extension of time on July 13, 2022 with no stated reasoning.
- On June 7, 2022 Court Reporter Jana Perry replied to an email inquiry that the “electronic appeal record will be filed on July 15, 2022”. As of this writing on July 16, 2022, Appellant was not notified of a filing nor readiness of the transcript.
- On June 8, 2022, Appellant spoke with Circuit Clerk Debbie Loggins. Ms. Loggins said the electronic appendix would be complete by July 5, 2022.
- Appellant made several inquiries of the deputy clerks and was told Debbie Loggins would need to answer the inquiries. Having no communication from Debbie Loggins between June 8th and July 14, 2022, Appellant left a voice mail stating that she would be to the clerk’s office in Searcy County on the afternoon of July 15, 2022. She asked for all orders and the motion for extension of time to be certified and for a separate packet of all documents filed since October 7, 2021 certified.
- On the afternoon of July 15, 2022, Appellant was at the clerk’s office. The requested documents were not ready. Deputy clerk Mary Beth prepared the orders and the one motion, apparently missing the order of July 13, 2022.
- Appellant spoke with Clerk Debbie Loggins for well over twenty minutes. The Clerk told Appellant that the record would take only an hour to prepare, but Ms. Loggins was not going to prepare it until Saturday, July 16, 2022. The clerk said this is the first electronic record she has prepared. She said she had a woman doing them for $100 each, and was going to have her daughter do them from now on, but assured Appellant she would complete the record in this case herself. [The cost charged to me for the completed electronic record was over $3,000. Good money maker for the clerk’s office and good way to keep the middle class from access to the appellate court.]
- Clerk Debbie Loggins told Appellant she would call her when the record is ready on Saturday. As of Sunday, July 17, 2022 at 12:15 P.M., Appellant received no call from the Clerk.
- Appellant asked Clerk Loggins if she could pay while she was already in the office. The Clerk said Appellant had the choice of driving back from Conway to Marshall on the following Monday or leaving a “blank check”. Neither option makes Appellant comfortable, and thus she is filing this petition to be certain to be in strict compliance.
- That for the foregoing reasons, counsel hereby requests that this Court grant the Writ of Certiorari to Complete the Record and order the record to be completed by the Court Reporter and Circuit Clerk within thirty (30) days.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner Hammett requests that this Court authorize its Clerk to issue a writ of certiorari to the Searcy County Circuit Court Clerk directing the clerk to complete preparation of the record on appeal in this case; and to the Court Reporter directing her to complete the transcripts.
Respectfully submitted, ______________________________
NOT SUBMITTED – MOOT
What Kind of Court Do We Want? Not A Court Run by Susan Weaver and Debbie Loggins
I voted for Judge Susan Weaver and Circuit Court Clerk Debbie Loggins of Searcy County Arkansas.
I am sorry for my vote.
Judge Weaver is tied for most evil judge I have come across. I have seen a lot of bad calls that had tragic effects on children’s lives. But most of these were made by California judges who identified as Democrats and Liberals. Judge Weaver has posted “praise Jesus” on the internet and represents herself as all country and apple pie. I escaped California and married a Christian populist and am offended and embarrassed by the hypocrisy of Susan Weaver.
I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice. I am telling you my experience and paraphrasing court rules with a citation to the rule for you to look up. You are allowed to interpret the law for yourself.
I filed a timely notice of appeal of all orders written by Judge Susan Weaver in a quiet title case filed against me by a former romantic and business partner. Merely scratching the surface of the errors made by Judge Weaver, she gave a property worth at least $199,000 from a trust that I was sole beneficiary of to my former boyfriend. This despite seeing a letter written by the ex-boyfriend, an ex-con describing his plan to defraud me of $80,000 and then sue me for much more.
The courts in Arkansas require the record for appeal to be filed within 90 days of the original notice of appeal. The responsibility for getting this done is on the appellant. So, if it looks like the clerk or court reporter will not do their jobs timely, the appellant must file a motion for extension of time and follow the rules strictly. If the Circuit Court denies the motion for extension, as did Judge Weaver for me, the appellant must file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Court of Appeals. The appellant can file a Petition for Writ of Mandate to compel the clerk and court reporter to do their jobs, but I think that the COA gives the mandate automatically, if they grant the Cert for extension of time. (Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 3-5)
Ironically, one order I am appealing is the granting of a motion for extension of time to serve summons that did not allow for me to respond in writing and that was an abuse of discretion, as the Plaintiff did not issue a summons before claiming that I was dodging service.
Circuit Clerk Debbie Loggins and Court Reporter Jana Perry both promised me they would have the record ready in time. But the record is due in less than a week and so I must write, serve and file my petition for writ of cert, which takes an amateur like myself several days. It also entails five hours of driving and the cost of getting certified copies of documents from Debbie Loggins.
It is a Catch-22 that may require me to file a petition for writ of mandate to compel Ms. Loggins to prepare the certified copies of orders that are needed for my Petition for Writ of Cert.
Why is the Clerk of the Court, the Court reporter and the Judge, Susan Kaye Weaver, making it so difficult to appeal Judge Weaver’s orders?
Whatever the reason, please do not vote for Susan Weaver or Debbie Loggins for any position in the future. They are incompetent, unethical or both.
Attorney William Zac White Running and Hiding
Who is the seediest attorney in Arkansas? My vote goes to William “Zac” White.
Judge Susan Weaver awarded a property that was held in trust to one of Mr. White’s clients, Mike Pietrczak, despite evidence presented that Mr. White knew his client was committing fraud on the trustee of the trust, me. Mr. White had a handwritten letter signed by his client that described the fraud. One of his helpers wrote a post it note that was in the same box of documents that said “ASK ZAC about Pietrczak’s letter”.
This was a default judgment because no attorney could be found to represent the trust and I was threatened with incarceration if I represented the trust. (I was denied a motion to intervene and had a heck of a time finding an attorney brave enough to go against Judge Weaver. Taking the case would be professional suicide.)
Judge Weaver should have dismissed the claim in August 2021, because Mr. White set the matter for trial before issuing a summons on the trust.
At the “trial”, to which no jurors were invited, Mr. White asked for a continuance and an extension of time to serve the trust the non-existent summons.
Mr. White said I was “running and hiding”. Court Reporter Jana Perry didn’t write that line in the transcript. She left out lots of other important stuff, too. And added in a few gems.
Of course I was not running and hiding. No summons was served on me as an individual, I found out about the case when I was doing research, and I answered, wrote a counter-claim and prepared for trial anyhow.
White, Weaver and Perry continued to work together as a team, apparently, until April 2022, when the trust property was given to Mr. White’s client. Of course, Mr. White and his helpers will be paid from the proceeds of sale. The property was sold for almost $200,000.
I have an interest in the property. I am the one Mr. White’s client defrauded. I am trustee and sole current beneficiary of the trust. My kids were supposed to inherit the property if I didn’t sell it sooner.
White said he was dismissing me from the case as an individual, then claimed I could not say anything in the default judgment hearing. I was not dismissed yet; I guess I was denied my most fundamental right in anticipation of when I’d be dismissed. When the order granting the property and then some was written, Judge Weaver said I did a bunch of stuff wrong as an individual and that I had no right to the property any longer. Jana Perry transcribed the hearing quite differently. They look like Brother Bear and Sister Bear in one of my favorite books, “Berenstain Bears and the Truth”. The story evolves as each adds their imaginations.
I filed a notice of appeal and sent a certified copy to Mr. White.
It was returned today as “REFUSED”. Who is running and hiding now, Willy?
A Higher Law 