You be the Judge: A Companion to the Strand-by-Strand Unraveling of Judge Lee P. Rudofsky’s Web of Lies and Deceit

The best proof that the collection calls from Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC to me, AKA “Laura Lynn”, were annoying and harassing are the recordings of the calls that were made by me and the recordings PRA made and selected to disclose.

If you are reading one of the books that arises from Hammett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates et al, you will probably find listening to these recordings to be enlightening.

Remember, Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a Trump nominee, decided that no reasonable juror could find the calls were annoying or harassing. He also agreed with PRA that the November 18, 2020 was the first call made to my cell phone since 2013. Neither the judge or the defendant explained why I decided to take a minute to set up my computer’s camera and speak to the stranger, despite my obvious policy and practice to refuse to speak to strangers who call me uninvited. (You can hear the minute pause on PRA’s recording below.)

UPDATE: I accidentally thought a second 2021-2-1 recording was a repeat and did not post it, and deleted it from the file I was working with. My video recording is here and I will look through my old emails for the original file transfer from PRA (in my spare time, lol).

There was a recording on 4-1-2021 between PRA and a third party that was carelessly copied to PRA’s evidence file on Hammett. I accidently posted it here, but deleted it immediately. It will be played at trial to show how easily PRA inputs data from one alleged debtor to another alleged debtor’s file.

PRA provided a second recording from 2021-4-10. It was another careless PRA error. It is a recording of a third party. It will be played at trial for the jury, but not here. It does show how different the response from a person who agrees he has a debt is from a person who does not have a debt.

To get a good picture of the integrity of the attorneys who defend Portfolio Recovery, compare the audio recordings to the transcript they ordered and entered as an exhibit. Judge Rudofsky listened to the recordings. He may have used the transcript to help him, or maybe not. If he did read along as he listened, he should have noticed that all the words the court reporter claimed were inaudible hurt the case of the party who paid her.

Download the transcript exhibit here.