Arkansas Judge Susan Weaver Ignores the Fraud in Front of Her Face – Again

Pro Se Plaintiff Betty Figueroa tried to present a police video showing US Bank employees defrauding her on behalf of the bank during a hearing this morning. Judge Weaver would not allow the disabled litigant to bring her phone into the Courthouse.

Mrs. Figueroa told Judge Weaver that she gave the court a copy of the video on CD a few days ago and asked her to watch it. Judge Weaver sternly admonished Betty that she was not allowed to introduce evidence that way.

The video is undeniable evidence that US Bank instructed Mrs. Figueroa, with the police as an intermediary, to mail her summons and complaint to the “Customer Care Unit” instead of their “registered agent for service of process”.

US Bank argued that service was improper because it was mailed to “the Customer Care Unit”. Judge Susan Weaver agreed and dismissed the case.

Technically, Mrs. Figueroa, who has aphasia from a traumatic brain injury and therefore has impaired language skills, had the summons addressed to the wrong person – but only because that is who and where the bank employee wrote on the deposit slip was proper service.

If US Bank did the same thing to me, I would pursue relief based on fraud. I would also report Judge Weaver to the JDDC for her apparent lack of concern that US Bank, represented by Rose Law Firm, allegedly used fraudulent tactics to trick the brain damaged woman into sending a faulty summons and complaint.

Let’s back up a bit. This is a case filed by Betty Figueroa against US Bank. Mrs. Figueroa claims she opened an account before her injury. She said she added money to the account several times. “They have $50,000 in my bank account that they won’t give me.”

US Bank employees told police, as seen on video, that the “social security number she is using is compromised.” The officer, based only on the word of the bank employees, said Betty “provided them with a fraudulent social…”.

The video would be comical if it was fiction. I will obtain it through a FOIA request and post it here in my free time. lol.

The two Conway Police Department officers did not know what “In Forma Pauperis” meant, even in the context of a motion to file in forma pauperis denied by Judge Weaver. The stooges had no clue how to pronounce the Latin term. Popposerous, formpopoisis, inposisis?

Mrs. Figueroa has a hard time proving she owns the account without discovery. She doesn’t have much paper documentation. She said she used online banking and was blocked out by US Bank.

The reasons I tend to believe Mrs. Figueroa is telling the truth are many. If she was trying to access the account fraudulently, the police were called by US Bank who Mirandized Mrs. Figueroa and detained her, why wasn’t she arrested? It seems like a slam dunk. Woman walks into bank, several times, demanding access to a specific account, the bank claims she had no right to the account and the bank has law enforcement and the court’s ear. Why would US Bank fight presenting evidence in discovery? Why didn’t they slap the cuffs on her when they had the chance?

Also, I know Judge Weaver is a liar and cheat. She regularly had Court Reporter Jana Perry fictionalize transcripts in hearings on my case. Then Judge Weaver said she listened to the tapes and the transcripts were correct, but the public cannot hear the tapes. Trust her and Nixon.

I know Judge Weaver saw a hand-written, signed note by represented litigant Mike Pietrczak that describes how he and attorney William Zac White intended to defraud me of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and she transferred my property held in trust to the fraudsters without allowing me to present a case. (Appeal of that order was fully briefed about 16 months ago, but is still sitting on someone’s desk, so to speak. Pietrczak moved to Washington State and it will cost me and the government about $2 million of court resources to have the value of the property restituted and the attorneys involved disbarred.)

It is inconceivable to me why the People of the State of Arkansas continue to allow our resources to be wasted by Susan Weaver and the court click that is so openly contemptuous of the common citizen.

Tags: , ,

Unknown's avatar

About LauraLynnHammett

Regular people like you and I should have access to justice, even if we can't afford an attorney. Judges must stop their cronyism. Attorneys who use abusive tactics against pro se litigants should be disbarred. This site discusses some of the abuses by our legal professionals. It also gives media attention to cases that are fought and sometimes won by the self represented.

3 responses to “Arkansas Judge Susan Weaver Ignores the Fraud in Front of Her Face – Again”

  1. Jason Kelley's avatar
    Jason Kelley says :

    <

    div dir=”ltr”>I brought three flash drives one for each party and wasn’t allowed to use any of the evidence I feel th

    Like

  2. Betty's avatar
    Betty says :

    I also filed a Writ she has not responded to after she dismissed my case

    Like

Leave a comment