UAMS Attorney and Insurer Playing Stupid Tricks
The two envelopes above supposedly delivered the same documents to two claimants. Ooops! Look at the metered postage.
The reason UAMS attorneys and insurance agents wanted to withhold the actual documents from me, one of the joint claimants on a case stemming from false imprisonment and battery, is that they caused partial deafness, aphasia, and PTSD in the other claimant. Now they don’t want him to have ADA accommodations during the proceedings.
I am incredibly busy, between my 1L year in law school and trying to make the state-run hospital pay restitution. So, I am going to just post our latest documents below. Enjoy the read.
Does UAMS Attorney Hallucinate; Or Does She Use ChatGPT? [Redacted for error on 11/1/2025]
My sincere apology. It is I who made the error, quoting the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, instead of the Arkansas rules, which do use the word “amend.”
Still, UAMS chose to lie to the Commission by submitting the original answers. UAMS’s counsel has access to the authors of the medical record and is paid to read the record; yet, counsel failed to admit that there was no written consent by Lynn to be found when she wrote the original responses.
You can download the full documents that were filed in this volley of motion practice, here:
A Higher Law 