Tag Archive | Pro se stands no chance though his story might be true

Pro Se Prisoner v. Pulaski County Sheriff Deputies

If I had to bet money, the sheriffs will win. But should they?

Procedurally, the pro se falls way below the mark. But the sheriffs, who are represented by a licensed attorney, have the lazy defense.

For one thing, the sheriffs made a blanket denial. These are rarely allowed. And an averment not denied (properly) is an averment admitted.

Anyhow, this case came to my attention as I began my research about the Pulaski County Sheriff’s liability for failing to attempt service on three of the defendants in my case against UAMS. 60cv-26-216 in Pulaski County Circuit Court.

Hopefully a licensed attorney will try to help Mr. Rice, and a licensed attorney will try to help my son Sean Lynn.