Pro Se Prisoner v. Pulaski County Sheriff Deputies

If I had to bet money, the sheriffs will win. But should they?

Procedurally, the pro se falls way below the mark. But the sheriffs, who are represented by a licensed attorney, have the lazy defense.

For one thing, the sheriffs made a blanket denial. These are rarely allowed. And an averment not denied (properly) is an averment admitted.

Anyhow, this case came to my attention as I began my research about the Pulaski County Sheriff’s liability for failing to attempt service on three of the defendants in my case against UAMS. 60cv-26-216 in Pulaski County Circuit Court.

Hopefully a licensed attorney will try to help Mr. Rice, and a licensed attorney will try to help my son Sean Lynn.

Tags: ,

Unknown's avatar

About LauraLynnHammett

Regular people like you and I should have access to justice, even if we can't afford an attorney. Judges must stop their cronyism. Attorneys who use abusive tactics against pro se litigants should be disbarred. This site discusses some of the abuses by our legal professionals. It also gives media attention to cases that are fought and sometimes won by the self represented.

Leave a comment